mooze wrote:
imalawyer wrote:
mooze wrote:
When they do the "final review" of the folks that have completed their interviews,...I understand at that point they're trying to build as diverse (in terms of work and background) and comprehensive a class as possible. Does this mean that perhaps academic attributes at this point are less important than somebody's personal background, essays, and work exp?
I think so. What I've heard is that the initial pre-interview reviews are focused more on academics and such, and that the interview and subsequent evaluations are mostly about fit.
And by fit you mean the whole package, personal background, diversity, work, etc,...not just how you performed in the interview? Cause I honestly don't know how i did in the interview. When i think of "fit" I immediately think of how someone comes off in the interview. I hope its more than that.
I'm not 100% on what 'fit' actually means, but interviews are considered as only a part of the whole in later evaluations. Relevant portion of Soojin's P&Q interview =
Soojin Kwon Koh wrote:
There is a final rating of, ‘Yes, I think this person will be a great fit.’ Or, ‘I’m not sure this person will be a great fit, but maybe their application has more information on areas I wasn’t clear on.’ Or, ‘I don’t think this person will be a good fit.’ It’s one of those three categories.
This is an online form so they provide comments on each with examples of why they think this person has a good rationale for an MBA. We request the evaluation within 24 hours of the interview, and last year we didn’t have to hunt anybody down. We tell interviewers that ‘you could be the reason we delay a decision on a candidate and they’re pushed to the next round. Please don’t be that reason.’
After the regional experts look at it in concert with the interview, they make a recommendation. Then, the senior AD gets it and looks at the overall pool. He might say, ‘We have too many people who are consultants.’ He takes first pass and then I take the second pass. There’s a lot of shifting about. We’ll waitlist some, un-waitlist other people, until we get to a number based on our historical admission rates. After I look at it, I send it on to Valerie (Suslow) who looks at the whole thing and once she blesses it we start communicating with the candidates.
And I feel your pain since I'm also unsure about my interview performance. I think that it went well enough and my interviewer was very nice, but there are always things that, in retrospect, you would have handled a bit differently if given the opportunity. Unless there's applause or you completely bomb, you never _really_ know with these things until the decision comes in. Best to not worry about it. Plus, we're down to only a week before R2 decisions are in!
Good luck to everyone!