Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Jul 1010:00 AM IST
-11:00 PM IST
Start your journey with a fully customized action plan and work with a dedicated mentor to achieve a 735+ score.
Jul 1012:00 PM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
50% off all study plans with code PROGRESS - Expires Monday 7/13
Jul 0608:00 AM PDT
-05:00 PM PDT
Compete to win some amazing Prizes such as Admissions Consulting Packages, Courses, and more. This is your Best Opportunity to improve your GMAT Score! Register to Participate
Jul 0810:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Receive 2 FREE hours of tutoring when you enroll in a 655+ course
Jul 1209:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EDT
Increase your score with a powerful GMAT course taught live online + 6 months of access to TTP OnDemand GMAT Masterclass included! Sundays July 12, 2026-October 1, 2026, 9:30am-12:30pm EST.- Jul 12
11:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Join us in a GMAT practice session and solve 25 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.
02 Sep 2019, 04:59
Kudos
Bookmarks
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
75%
(hard)
Question Stats:
53% (02:10) correct
47%
(02:14)
wrong
based on 1053
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Chronic back pain is usually caused by a herniated or degenerated spinal disk. In most cases the disk will have been damaged years before chronic pain develops, and in fact an estimated one in five people over the age of 30 has a herniated or degenerated disk that shows no chronic symptoms. If chronic pain later develops in such a case, it is generally brought about by a deterioration of the abdominal and spinal muscles caused by insufficient exercise.
The statements above, if true, most strongly support which one of the following?
(A) Four out of five people over the age of 30 can be sure they will never develop chronic back pain.
(B) People who exercise their abdominal and spinal muscles regularly are sure to be free from chronic back pain.
(C) Patients rarely suffer even mild and fleeting back pain at the time that a spinal disk first becomes herniated or degenerated.
(D) Doctors can accurately predict which people who do not have chronic back pain will develop it in the future.
(E) There is a strategy that can be effective in delaying or preventing the onset of pain from a currently asymptomatic herniated or degenerated spinal disk.
The statements above, if true, most strongly support which one of the following?
(A) Four out of five people over the age of 30 can be sure they will never develop chronic back pain.
(B) People who exercise their abdominal and spinal muscles regularly are sure to be free from chronic back pain.
(C) Patients rarely suffer even mild and fleeting back pain at the time that a spinal disk first becomes herniated or degenerated.
(D) Doctors can accurately predict which people who do not have chronic back pain will develop it in the future.
(E) There is a strategy that can be effective in delaying or preventing the onset of pain from a currently asymptomatic herniated or degenerated spinal disk.
Updated on: 15 Jun 2021, 00:16
Originally posted by Fdambro294 on 11 Jun 2021, 22:35.
Last edited by Fdambro294 on 15 Jun 2021, 00:16, edited 3 times in total.
Last edited by Fdambro294 on 15 Jun 2021, 00:16, edited 3 times in total.
Kudos
Bookmarks
I’m not an expert, but I can try my best to tell you what I see. Maybe it will help?
The first thing is to realize that when a question asks you “which of the following is most strongly supported”, the correct answer is not always a 100% must be true inference. The question is asking you for the conclusion that is “most STRONGLY supported.” A subtle difference, but very important.
Usually you can tell what kind of answer you are looking for based on the question stem. For a pure Inference question that requires an answer that must be 100% valid, the question stem will generally be asking you to draw from the passage something that must be categorically true.
This question is not asking for that. We are asked to find the answer that is “most strongly supported” by the facts and premises in the passage.
We are looking for a solid Conclusion that an author would make using the facts provided as supporting evidence. The conclusion should be strongly supported by the facts. It may not be 100% categorically true in all instances based on the statements. I like to think of it as something just beneath that 100% threshold: as strongly supported as possible by the facts.
The prior sentence is the key. The correct answer will tie together all the premises provided in the passage into a logical conclusion. In a pure Inference question, in which we are asked to find the fact that must be 100% valid, the answer can be based on any single line in the passage. As long as the answer must be categorically true, it is correct.
What makes E “strongly supported” by the facts is that we are told that an estimated 1 in 5 over the age of 30 has a hurt back that shows no chronic pain symptoms. Then, we are told if chronic pain later develops it is generally caused by a weakening of the abdominal/spinal muscles, which is itself generally caused by not enough exercise.
Thus, the facts tells us that if chronic pain develops later in life for this group or people, then, in general, insufficient exercise may be the ultimate cause.
For these people over the age of 30 with a hurt back and showing no chronic pain, there should be an effective strategy to prevent the weakening of the abdominal/spinal muscles and it’s corresponding effect of chronic pain: exercising these muscles so there is no deterioration in the first place.
If insufficient exercise is what generally brings about this chronic pain later in life, then we have a strong basis to conclude that SUFFICIENT exercise could be enough to prevent the deterioration of the abdominal/spinal muscles, which itself generally leads to the onset of chronic pain for these hurt people.
Thus, the facts do provide good support for the claim made in answer (E): that there is a strategy that can be effective in delaying the onset of chronic pain (a strategy of sufficient exercise of the core area).
Furthermore, answer E seems to “tie together” the passage into a logical conclusion, which is “strongly supported” by the facts.
There are two issues with C, in my opinion. First, the answer is more along the lines of a fact. It certainly doesn’t seem to “tie in” all the premises in the passage in a way that we can say the passage most strongly supports C.
More importantly, we really don’t have a strong basis (given the premises) to opine on whether people experience any kind of mild or fleeting pain at the time of the initial back injury. The passage is focused on chronic pain: when this chronic pain shows up and the potential causes for it appearing later in life. We can not say whether someone experiences some sort of mild pain when she first damages her back. Maybe she does, maybe she doesn’t.
It took me a while to see the difference between the 2 question types. It’s a subtle difference, but it makes all the difference in the world when answering the question.
Look up a bunch of good “Inference” questions from good sources. Then, look at the different answers for each question stem type. By following this course, only then was I able to see the difference.
Hopefully something was helpful?
Edit: Apologies, I tortured the facts from the passage in my first post. Answering from a phone is probably not the smartest idea.
Again, apologies for the mistake.
Posted from my mobile device
The first thing is to realize that when a question asks you “which of the following is most strongly supported”, the correct answer is not always a 100% must be true inference. The question is asking you for the conclusion that is “most STRONGLY supported.” A subtle difference, but very important.
Usually you can tell what kind of answer you are looking for based on the question stem. For a pure Inference question that requires an answer that must be 100% valid, the question stem will generally be asking you to draw from the passage something that must be categorically true.
This question is not asking for that. We are asked to find the answer that is “most strongly supported” by the facts and premises in the passage.
We are looking for a solid Conclusion that an author would make using the facts provided as supporting evidence. The conclusion should be strongly supported by the facts. It may not be 100% categorically true in all instances based on the statements. I like to think of it as something just beneath that 100% threshold: as strongly supported as possible by the facts.
The prior sentence is the key. The correct answer will tie together all the premises provided in the passage into a logical conclusion. In a pure Inference question, in which we are asked to find the fact that must be 100% valid, the answer can be based on any single line in the passage. As long as the answer must be categorically true, it is correct.
What makes E “strongly supported” by the facts is that we are told that an estimated 1 in 5 over the age of 30 has a hurt back that shows no chronic pain symptoms. Then, we are told if chronic pain later develops it is generally caused by a weakening of the abdominal/spinal muscles, which is itself generally caused by not enough exercise.
Thus, the facts tells us that if chronic pain develops later in life for this group or people, then, in general, insufficient exercise may be the ultimate cause.
For these people over the age of 30 with a hurt back and showing no chronic pain, there should be an effective strategy to prevent the weakening of the abdominal/spinal muscles and it’s corresponding effect of chronic pain: exercising these muscles so there is no deterioration in the first place.
If insufficient exercise is what generally brings about this chronic pain later in life, then we have a strong basis to conclude that SUFFICIENT exercise could be enough to prevent the deterioration of the abdominal/spinal muscles, which itself generally leads to the onset of chronic pain for these hurt people.
Thus, the facts do provide good support for the claim made in answer (E): that there is a strategy that can be effective in delaying the onset of chronic pain (a strategy of sufficient exercise of the core area).
Furthermore, answer E seems to “tie together” the passage into a logical conclusion, which is “strongly supported” by the facts.
There are two issues with C, in my opinion. First, the answer is more along the lines of a fact. It certainly doesn’t seem to “tie in” all the premises in the passage in a way that we can say the passage most strongly supports C.
More importantly, we really don’t have a strong basis (given the premises) to opine on whether people experience any kind of mild or fleeting pain at the time of the initial back injury. The passage is focused on chronic pain: when this chronic pain shows up and the potential causes for it appearing later in life. We can not say whether someone experiences some sort of mild pain when she first damages her back. Maybe she does, maybe she doesn’t.
It took me a while to see the difference between the 2 question types. It’s a subtle difference, but it makes all the difference in the world when answering the question.
Look up a bunch of good “Inference” questions from good sources. Then, look at the different answers for each question stem type. By following this course, only then was I able to see the difference.
Hopefully something was helpful?
Edit: Apologies, I tortured the facts from the passage in my first post. Answering from a phone is probably not the smartest idea.
Again, apologies for the mistake.
Aditya1803
Posted from my mobile device
14 Jun 2021, 23:17
Kudos
Bookmarks
Bunuel
The paragraph is self explanatory, so let us tackle C and E, the options that are the source of confusion.
(C) Patients rarely suffer even mild and fleeting back pain at the time that a spinal disk first becomes herniated or degenerated.
Let us refer to the part of the para that could clear the confusion or that would further create tangled web of information.
In most cases the disk will have been damaged years before chronic pain develops: This means, in very rare cases, the chronic pain will develop at the time that a spinal disk first becomes herniated or degenerated.
But the option very subtly changes chronic pain to mild and fleeting pain. There is nothing in para that suggests or supports the conclusion that even fleeting pains are rare. It may just be possible that in most cases, the patients have felt mild and fleeting pain initially and that never returns thereafter.
(E) There is a strategy that can be effective in delaying or preventing the onset of pain from a currently asymptomatic herniated or degenerated spinal disk.
Let us again check the para for some information.
If chronic pain later develops in such a case, it is generally brought about by a deterioration of the abdominal and spinal muscles caused by insufficient exercise: Clearly if these patients were doing regular exercises, there was a possibility that the chronic pain would not have started.
This option too uses words 'can' and 'delaying' to talk of the possibility to avoid chronic pain.
It is surely supported by the para.
E
