This is from LSAT Prep Test #50, Section 2, Question #25.
The
OA is D. Please change it in the original post.
Here is the simplified argument --
External circumstances often play a crucial role in our moral judgment of an action --> Intentions are not the only factor in determining moral guiltThis is supported by giving an example -- of a cook at a restaurant.
Let us take a look at the answer options --
Option A -- IncorrectThe author does not talk about fair/unfair OR right/wrong. He/She reports on what factors influence people decisions in making moral judgments. Nothing about whether those judgments are fair or unfair.
Option B - IncorrectThe author does not give his/her opinion on whether such judgments are fair/unfair. She reports only on the factors that influence such decisions -- stating that intentions are not the only factor.
Option C - IncorrectThe author does not give his/her opinion on how people should be judged. However, others are sometimes judged based on the outcomes of their actions.
Option D - Correct answerTrue as is illustrated by the example given in the argument. "circumstances outside their intentional control" = the cook did not commit the action intentionally but the action was committed due to
negligence.
(The circumstances could have been "controlled" by the cook if he were more careful, but they were outside his "intentional control".)
Option E - Incorrect"The intentions of the person performing an action are
rarely a decisive factor" -- We cannot make this inference based on 1 example.
Moreover, the conclusion clearly states -- "Intentions are not the only factor in determining moral guilt" (there might be other factors too). This is not the same as "rarely a decisive factor".