Hovkial wrote:
Commentator: Many social critics claim that contemporary journalists' cynical tendency to look for selfish motives behind the seemingly altruistic actions of powerful people undermines our society's well-being by convincing people that success is invariably associated with greed and mendacity. But the critics' claim is absurd. The cynicism of contemporary journalists cannot be a contributing factor to the undermining of our society's well-being, for journalists have always been cynics. Today's journalists are, if anything, more restrained than their predecessors.
The reasoning in the commentator's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it overlooks the possibility that
(A) widespread cynicism is beneficial to the well-being of society
(B) cynicism about the motives of powerful people increases with the amount of information one has about them
(C) the work of contemporary journalists reflects a cynicism that is not really genuine
(D) any accurate description of human behavior portrays it as selfish
(E) cynicism of this type on the part of journalists has always had a negative effect on the well-being of society
Commentator: Many social critics claim that contemporary journalists'
cynical tendency to look for selfish motives behind the seemingly altruistic actions of powerful people undermines our society's well-being by convincing people that success is invariably associated with greed and mendacity.
But the critics' claim is absurd. The
cynicism of contemporary journalists cannot be a contributing factor to the undermining of our society's well-being, for journalists have always been cynics.
Today's journalists are, if anything,
more restrained than their predecessors.
Critics Claim- J's C to look for selfish motives behind Altruistic actions of powerful people undermined our society's well being.
But Critics Claim is absurd.
Js have always been C. So, C cant be a contributing factor to the undermining of our Society's well being. Todays Js are more restrained.
The reasoning in the commentator's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it overlooks the possibility that
Question Type: FLAW IN THE REASONING(A) widespread cynicism is beneficial to the well-being of society -
if cynicism is beneficial, then commentator claim is valid that critics claim is absurd.
(B) cynicism about the motives of powerful people increases with the amount of information one has about them -
Out of Scope.(C) the work of contemporary journalists reflects a cynicism that is not really genuine -
Out of Scope.(D) any accurate description of human behavior portrays it as selfish -
Irrelevant(E) cynicism of this type on the part of journalists has always had a negative effect on the well-being of society -
CORRECTif this option is true, then, Js always have been behaving in same way, and thus Critics claim can't be absurd.
**Drop Kudos, If this post helps!!**