I don't fully agree with OA to Q1.
The answer choice
D. New Amsterdam served as a trading center for furs exported to Europe.relies on..
At the time, the Dutch, inveterate traders, were more interested in the spice trade than in the mercantile value of New Amsterdam and so accepted the offer. in the passage.
However, the passage does not say that NA had 0 mercantile value. It just says that spice trade had more of a value. If Dutch were able to cultivate nutmeg trees outside, then, they would not have necessarily ceded NA. A seems to me a better choice.
If D had said something along the lines of comparison, one could have accepted it. But the logical jump in D is quiet significant. Just because NA has some mercantile value, therefore, the Dutch would have resisted bartering it with English?
The passage does not even mention "low mercantile value" of NA, so one can "infer" some sort of "degree" of trade occuring at NA.
Would like to hear thoughts of people on this.
The question say we need to strenthen so if Amsterdam would help in comemrcially that is fur export then we can say it strengthen the\at New Amsterdam would have remained a Dutch possession if not for the conflict over nutmeg. We are adding external information to strengthen the claim.