Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 07:05 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 07:05
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
surat
Joined: 09 Jun 2003
Last visit: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
687
 [28]
Location: work chair
Posts: 127
Kudos: 687
 [28]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
24
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,511
 [6]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,511
 [6]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
dj
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Last visit: 25 Jun 2012
Posts: 558
Own Kudos:
Location: Florida
Posts: 558
Kudos: 1,026
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
surat
Joined: 09 Jun 2003
Last visit: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
687
 [4]
Location: work chair
Posts: 127
Kudos: 687
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Geethu
Only C stands a chance

i also voted for c, but it is b and here is the explanation:
the conclusion of this weaken argument is that baldness is caused by external factors (and not internal ones), and it states that there are more bald guys in big cities. (b) turns this premise on its head by saying that many bald guys in cities are related to other bald guys in the same city, so the cause might be heredity after all. treating baldness is utterly irrelevant, so you can get rid of (a). (c) is too general, because it talks about all men rather than just those who live in big cities. (d) strengthens the argument by saying that guys who don't live in cities don't go bald. (e) also lessens the chance baldness is hereditary.
User avatar
prabsahi
Joined: 09 Jun 2014
Last visit: 24 Mar 2025
Posts: 216
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 205
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
Products:
Posts: 216
Kudos: 289
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here is my attempt to explain why B is right..The argument makes an assumption that people who live in large cities lead a stressful urban lifestyle...and this basically implies that large city people have work related stress etc..Now ...consider a weakner ...what if some people are born here in large cities and its a just a normal home to them like it is for not so large cities..In that case the conclusion falls..

Hope it helps!!
User avatar
TheGraceful
Joined: 10 Apr 2018
Last visit: 28 Jan 2024
Posts: 333
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 217
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GMAT 1: 600 Q44 V28
GPA: 3.56
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Products:
GMAT 1: 600 Q44 V28
Posts: 333
Kudos: 216
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most doctors dismiss male pattern baldness as a problem of heredity. <==== Premise
A new theory, however, postulates that baldness can also result from number of external factors, such as a stressful urban lifestyle. <====Conclusion
Supporters of this new theory point out that baldness is twice as common among male who live in cities as it is among those who live elsewhere.<===== Assumption

A. Scientists have developed several drugs that halt baldness in men and can be taken internally <=== out of scope and not a weakner
B. Census reports show that most men who are born in large cities live almost their entire lives within the city of their birth to remain close to their families <==== Let's keep this
C. Most men do not develop male pattern baldness until they reach the age of 55, at which point their thoughts turn to pursuing a more restful lifestyle <=== That means, more bald people switch to restful lifestyle and not the stressed urban lifestyle. In fact a Strengthener
D. Men who never lived in large cities are those who are least likely to develop male pattern baldness <=== People in non urban area don't get bald/get less bald. Strengthener.
E. A study determined that bald men are less likely to marry and reproduce <=== out of scope
User avatar
shubangini
Joined: 03 Oct 2015
Last visit: 29 Jun 2022
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
9
 [2]
Given Kudos: 6
WE:Marketing (Education)
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ok I don't understand.

If external factors cause baldness and If men start balding at 55, but switch to restful lifestyle they shouldn't bald according to the conclusion by according to C, that's what happens but the problem is still there. So C should be right.

And for D, If men stay in cities all their life you don't know if it's hereditary or the lifestyle causing baldness. How does this weaken the argument?

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
TheGraceful
Joined: 10 Apr 2018
Last visit: 28 Jan 2024
Posts: 333
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 217
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GMAT 1: 600 Q44 V28
GPA: 3.56
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Products:
GMAT 1: 600 Q44 V28
Posts: 333
Kudos: 216
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shubangini
Ok I don't understand.

If external factors cause baldness and If men start balding at 55, but switch to restful lifestyle they shouldn't bald according to the conclusion by according to C, that's what happens but the problem is still there. So C should be right.

==> I think, its not the argument(option), but you, who is assuming that process of baldness will stop. In fact, it's the result(baldness) that make people realise about the lifestyle(cause) and switch to better one. (of course without any change in result that has already occured- baldness)

shubangini
And for D, If men stay in cities all their life you don't know if it's hereditary or the lifestyle causing baldness. How does this weaken the argument?


==>option D simply says, that people outside cities have least/lesser chances of getting bald. Just rephrase this - and that means people living in urban areas have higher chances of getting bald. So this option supports conclusion and becomes strenghner and NOT the weakener.­
User avatar
vishwajeet112
Joined: 09 Oct 2023
Last visit: 25 Jun 2025
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 24
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In option B All cities men confined within city with there father(i.e family) so there is logic high numbers of men are there by in the same family having bladness problem so therefore chances having baldness by genetically are increases

Posted from my mobile device
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
188 posts