Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 07:02 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 07:02
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,389
Own Kudos:
778,234
 [5]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,389
Kudos: 778,234
 [5]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
genericUser
Joined: 31 Jan 2022
Last visit: 22 Dec 2023
Posts: 111
Own Kudos:
91
 [1]
Given Kudos: 35
Location: Italy
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V33
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37
GPA: 3.9
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37
Posts: 111
Kudos: 91
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
nova31
Joined: 11 Jun 2019
Last visit: 04 Jul 2024
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
14
 [1]
Given Kudos: 74
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
Posts: 13
Kudos: 14
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Shadyshades
Joined: 02 Nov 2020
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 118
Own Kudos:
84
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,099
Location: India
GMAT 1: 220 Q2 V2
GMAT 1: 220 Q2 V2
Posts: 118
Kudos: 84
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If i need to strengthen the new theory, i must prove that the growth pattern displays during the presence of heat and the absence of CO.
If both heat and CO are present, how would i know the real factor leading to growth pattern ?

Cut down to A&B.

The argument never talks about "normal juniper".
Option A wins.
User avatar
Mavisdu1017
Joined: 10 Aug 2021
Last visit: 04 Jan 2023
Posts: 360
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 226
Posts: 360
Kudos: 46
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
swarnav31
Bunuel
The cause of the peculiar columnar growth pattern displayed by junipers growing near burning underground veins of lignite coal has never been convincingly explained. Until recently, the accepted theory posited that the abundance of carbon monoxide in the local atmosphere caused the columnar growth. However, a new theory holds that the cause is the persistent heat present near these underground fires which, while not intense enough to inflame the trees, can nonetheless change their normal growth pattern.


IMO the answer is D.

We need to "strengthen" the new theory as well as "weaken" the previous theory -
1 - persistent( and not intense) heat is the cause of change in growth pattern
2 - carbon monoxide abundance is the cause


A. A columnar juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and an absence of carbon monoxide.
- weakens (1).
B. A normal juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and an absence of carbon monoxide.
- strengthens (1) but strengthens (2) as well.
C. A columnar juniper growing in an atmosphere of normal heat and a high concentration of carbon monoxide.
- same reason as in (B)
D. A normal juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and a high concentration of carbon monoxide.
- strengthens (1) and weakens (2). CORRECT OPTION.
E. A columnar juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and a high concentration of carbon monoxide
- weakens (1)

Feedback or better approaches are appreciated!

I think the same with you comrade, but it is wrong...Can anybody help? Or pls offer the OE
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
5,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,579
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mavisdu1017
swarnav31

IMO the answer is D.

We need to "strengthen" the new theory as well as "weaken" the previous theory -
1 - persistent( and not intense) heat is the cause of change in growth pattern
2 - carbon monoxide abundance is the cause


A. A columnar juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and an absence of carbon monoxide.
- weakens (1).
B. A normal juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and an absence of carbon monoxide.
- strengthens (1) but strengthens (2) as well.
C. A columnar juniper growing in an atmosphere of normal heat and a high concentration of carbon monoxide.
- same reason as in (B)
D. A normal juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and a high concentration of carbon monoxide.
- strengthens (1) and weakens (2). CORRECT OPTION.
E. A columnar juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and a high concentration of carbon monoxide
- weakens (1)

Feedback or better approaches are appreciated!

I think the same with you comrade, but it is wrong...Can anybody help? Or pls offer the OE
The question is the following:

The existence of which of the following would provide the strongest support for the new theory?

The new theory that the correct answer will support is the following:

the cause (of the columnar junipers) is the persistent heat present near these underground fires

Let's consider choice (D).

(D) A normal juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and a high concentration of carbon monoxide.

This case casts doubt on both theories by showing that a juniper can grow normally in a situation in which both proposed causes, heat and high concentration of carbon monoxide, exist.

It's true that the passage mentions "persistent heat," while this choice mentions "intense heat," but since none of the answer choices mentions "persistent heat," or any other type of unusual heat, we have to go with the idea that the question writer meant "intense heat" to represent the type of "persistent heat" conditions mentioned in the passage.

Now, let's consider choice (A).

(A) A columnar juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and an absence of carbon monoxide.

In this case, the juniper is columnar when the first proposed cause, high concentration of carbon monoxide, is absent, and the second prooposed cause, heat, is present. So, this case casts doubt on the first theory and supports the new theory by showing that, even without the first cause, a juniper will display the columnar growth pattern in a situatiion in which the second cause is present.

The correct answer is (A).
User avatar
Mavisdu1017
Joined: 10 Aug 2021
Last visit: 04 Jan 2023
Posts: 360
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 226
Posts: 360
Kudos: 46
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MartyTargetTestPrep
Mavisdu1017
swarnav31

IMO the answer is D.

We need to "strengthen" the new theory as well as "weaken" the previous theory -
1 - persistent( and not intense) heat is the cause of change in growth pattern
2 - carbon monoxide abundance is the cause


A. A columnar juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and an absence of carbon monoxide.
- weakens (1).
B. A normal juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and an absence of carbon monoxide.
- strengthens (1) but strengthens (2) as well.
C. A columnar juniper growing in an atmosphere of normal heat and a high concentration of carbon monoxide.
- same reason as in (B)
D. A normal juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and a high concentration of carbon monoxide.
- strengthens (1) and weakens (2). CORRECT OPTION.
E. A columnar juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and a high concentration of carbon monoxide
- weakens (1)

Feedback or better approaches are appreciated!

I think the same with you comrade, but it is wrong...Can anybody help? Or pls offer the OE
The question is the following:

The existence of which of the following would provide the strongest support for the new theory?

The new theory that the correct answer will support is the following:

the cause (of the columnar junipers) is the persistent heat present near these underground fires

Let's consider choice (D).

(D) A normal juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and a high concentration of carbon monoxide.

This case casts doubt on both theories by showing that a juniper can grow normally in a situation in which both proposed causes, heat and high concentration of carbon monoxide, exist.

It's true that the passage mentions "persistent heat," while this choice mentions "intense heat," but since none of the answer choices mentions "persistent heat," or any other type of unusual heat, we have to go with the idea that the question writer meant "intense heat" to represent the type of "persistent heat" conditions mentioned in the passage.

Now, let's consider choice (A).

(A) A columnar juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and an absence of carbon monoxide.

In this case, the juniper is columnar when the first proposed cause, high concentration of carbon monoxide, is absent, and the second prooposed cause, heat, is present. So, this case casts doubt on the first theory and supports the new theory by showing that, even without the first cause, a juniper will display the columnar growth pattern in a situatiion in which the second cause is present.

The correct answer is (A).
MartyTargetTestPrep Much thanks for your response.
we have to go with the idea that the question writer meant "intense heat" to represent the type of "persistent heat" conditions mentioned in the passage——this really confused me. If so, I can understand.
This question might NOT be a good question, as its wording makes testers confused.
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
5,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,579
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mavisdu1017
MartyTargetTestPrep Much thanks for your response.
we have to go with the idea that the question writer meant "intense heat" to represent the type of "persistent heat" conditions mentioned in the passage—�—this really confused me. If so, I can understand.
This question might NOT be a good question, as its wording makes testers confused.
Yes, this question is flawed in that the wording does not make clear that the passage and the answer choices are mentioning similar conditions.
User avatar
RiyaJ0032
Joined: 13 Dec 2021
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 201
Own Kudos:
17
 [1]
Given Kudos: 53
Posts: 201
Kudos: 17
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello MartyMurray

if you could please explain why the answer can't be B?

If we have normal juniper displaying columnar growth patterns even in the absence of 1st cause (Carbon monoxide), would it not lend support to the 2nd cause?

I thought the first option won't be feasible because here the juniper is already displaying columnar growth

for us to confirm the alternate cause, we need a normal juniper displaying the highlighted growth


Please if some expert could confirm, would be a great help!!

Thank you so much

KarishmaB
egmat
GMATNinja
MartyTargetTestPrep

The question is the following:

The existence of which of the following would provide the strongest support for the new theory?

The new theory that the correct answer will support is the following:

the cause (of the columnar junipers) is the persistent heat present near these underground fires

Let's consider choice (D).

(D) A normal juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and a high concentration of carbon monoxide.

This case casts doubt on both theories by showing that a juniper can grow normally in a situation in which both proposed causes, heat and high concentration of carbon monoxide, exist.

It's true that the passage mentions "persistent heat," while this choice mentions "intense heat," but since none of the answer choices mentions "persistent heat," or any other type of unusual heat, we have to go with the idea that the question writer meant "intense heat" to represent the type of "persistent heat" conditions mentioned in the passage.

Now, let's consider choice (A).

(A) A columnar juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and an absence of carbon monoxide.

In this case, the juniper is columnar when the first proposed cause, high concentration of carbon monoxide, is absent, and the second prooposed cause, heat, is present. So, this case casts doubt on the first theory and supports the new theory by showing that, even without the first cause, a juniper will display the columnar growth pattern in a situatiion in which the second cause is present.

The correct answer is (A).
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,994
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
RiyaJ0032
Hello MartyMurray

if you could please explain why the answer can't be B?

If we have normal juniper displaying columnar growth patterns even in the absence of 1st cause (Carbon monoxide), would it not lend support to the 2nd cause?

I thought the first option won't be feasible because here the juniper is already displaying columnar growth

for us to confirm the alternate cause, we need a normal juniper displaying the highlighted growth


Please if some expert could confirm, would be a great help!!

Thank you so much

KarishmaB
egmat
GMATNinja


B. A normal juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and an absence of carbon monoxide.

Option (B) does not say that the juniper displays columnar growth. It clearly says "normal juniper" so the juniper grows as it should in the absence of CO but presence of intense heat. It weakens the new theory.
User avatar
RiyaJ0032
Joined: 13 Dec 2021
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 201
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 53
Posts: 201
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi KarishmaB!

Appreciate the reply!

Just wanted to elaborate on that-

Actually, yes (B) does not tell us normal juniper displays columnar growth patterns

by that what I meant was, say we have normal juniper growing amidst intense heat and absence of CO

Now within a period of time if this normal juniper starts growing in a columnar pattern, won't it lend support to the theory?

whereas in (a), we already have columnar juniper
it has grown in a columnar pattern, not in a normal pattern

so even if you make this columnar juniper grow amidst intense heart but absence of CO, what does it confirm

It is any which way columnar



KarishmaB


B. A normal juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and an absence of carbon monoxide.

Option (B) does not say that the juniper displays columnar growth. It clearly says "normal juniper" so the juniper grows as it should in the absence of CO but presence of intense heat. It weakens the new theory.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,994
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Normal and columnar are not inherent characteristics of a juniper. The way it grew defines it as 'normal' or 'columnar'. The way it grew depends on the environment. So it is not that a juniper starts normally and then changes midway to columnar because of environment. Only one or the other type of growth happens based on the environment. So a normal juniper in high heat only shows that heat doesn't lead to columnar growth. The normal juniper doesn't change midway to columnar.

RiyaJ0032
Hi KarishmaB!

Appreciate the reply!

Just wanted to elaborate on that-

Actually, yes (B) does not tell us normal juniper displays columnar growth patterns

by that what I meant was, say we have normal juniper growing amidst intense heat and absence of CO

Now within a period of time if this normal juniper starts growing in a columnar pattern, won't it lend support to the theory?

whereas in (a), we already have columnar juniper
it has grown in a columnar pattern, not in a normal pattern

so even if you make this columnar juniper grow amidst intense heart but absence of CO, what does it confirm

It is any which way columnar




Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
188 posts