Mavisdu1017
swarnav31
IMO the answer is D.
We need to "strengthen" the new theory as well as "weaken" the previous theory -
1 - persistent( and not intense) heat is the cause of change in growth pattern
2 - carbon monoxide abundance is the cause
A. A columnar juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and an absence of carbon monoxide.
- weakens (1).
B. A normal juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and an absence of carbon monoxide.
- strengthens (1) but strengthens (2) as well.
C. A columnar juniper growing in an atmosphere of normal heat and a high concentration of carbon monoxide.
- same reason as in (B)
D. A normal juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and a high concentration of carbon monoxide.
- strengthens (1) and weakens (2). CORRECT OPTION.
E. A columnar juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and a high concentration of carbon monoxide
- weakens (1)
Feedback or better approaches are appreciated!
I think the same with you comrade, but it is wrong...Can anybody help? Or pls offer the OE
The question is the following:
The existence of which of the following would provide the strongest support for the new theory?The new theory that the correct answer will support is the following:
the cause (of the columnar junipers) is the persistent heat present near these underground firesLet's consider choice (D).
(D) A normal juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and a high concentration of carbon monoxide.This case casts doubt on both theories by showing that a juniper can grow normally in a situation in which both proposed causes, heat and high concentration of carbon monoxide, exist.
It's true that the passage mentions "persistent heat," while this choice mentions "intense heat," but since none of the answer choices mentions "persistent heat," or any other type of unusual heat, we have to go with the idea that the question writer meant "intense heat" to represent the type of "persistent heat" conditions mentioned in the passage.
Now, let's consider choice (A).
(A) A columnar juniper growing in an atmosphere of intense heat and an absence of carbon monoxide.In this case, the juniper is columnar when the first proposed cause, high concentration of carbon monoxide, is absent, and the second prooposed cause, heat, is present. So, this case casts doubt on the first theory and supports the new theory by showing that, even without the first cause, a juniper will display the columnar growth pattern in a situatiion in which the second cause is present.
The correct answer is (A).