Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
91%
(01:18)
correct 9%
(01:00)
wrong
based on 202
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Experts have suggested that schools need to give greater significance and allocate more time to sports-related activities, rather than focusing only on academics. They argue that physical activity is intrinsic to a growing child's overall development. While this point is certainly valid, the average twelve-year-old already goes through a sport schedule of four hours a week as part of the school schedule, and it is surely unnecessary to prolong the time allotted to physical activity.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the authors argument depends?
a. All the various types of sports that twelve-year-olds usually play are equally beneficial. b. A well-organized athletics schedule helps children excel in their chosen sport. c. Sports activities are as important as academic work. d. Most schools allot time to sports and related activities that does not vary much from the average. e. The skills that children learn during athletic activities cannot be compared with those that they develop during academic work.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Experts have suggested that schools need to give greater significance and allocate more time to sports-related activities, rather than focusing only on academics. They argue that physical activity is intrinsic to a growing child's overall development. While this point is certainly valid, the average twelve-year-old already goes through a sport schedule of four hours a week as part of the school schedule, and it is surely unnecessary to prolong the time allotted to physical activity.
Argument breaks down to the concluding point that four hours per week schedule currently maintained by schools are sufficient for overall child development and further extension of time is not required as suggested by experts.
Option D says that Most schools allot time to sports and related activities that does not vary much from the average.
If the allotted time of 4 hours is insufficient or less than the average required , then definitely schools needs to allocate more time for sports. The opinion of the author that prolonging the time dedicated for sports is unnecessary falls apart if Option 4 is negated.
D seems best: Most schools allot time to sports and related activities that does not vary much from the average
Show more
I was torn between D and E. My logic for E is that if you negate it, meaning that the skills learned during athletics are comparable to those learned during academic work, wouldn't the author's argument fall apart? If athletics = academics in terms of skills, then the author should be indifferent about increasing time spent on sports, since the net benefit to child development will be the same.
For D, I felt like it would have been more appropriate if the author was speaking about a specific school, and making the point that the average is 4 hours. In that case, the implicit assumption is that the specific school is comparable to the average of the group. However, when the author argues that physical activity doesn't need to be prolonged, it could mean that he doesn't think the average needs to be prolonged, in which case it doesn't really matter whether schools vary much from the average.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.