Despite the fact that River City increased the average class size by more than 15% in all grades two years ago, this year’s average SAT scores for the junior class were the highest ever. This shows that class size is not a good determinant of student performance. Consequently, other school districts should follow River City’s lead and save money by increasing the size of their classes. Each of the following statements, if true, is a valid objection to this argument EXCEPT:
A) The advantages of smaller classes are more pronounced in elementary school than in high school.
This shows that smaller class is better than large class and hence other school should not follow River city.B) The number of classroom discipline problems reported by teachers is directly proportional to the number of students in the classroom.
Other school should no increase class size as more students lead to more problems.C) Japanese schools have a lower teacher-to-student ratio than American schools do and have generally better results on international standardized tests.
Assume that Japan has more students than America, in terms of class, and has equal number of teachers then the condition here will be true. But more students are leading to better results. So, its not an objection but supports the argument.D) Three years ago, the eighth graders in River City Middle School had very high scores on their standardized tests.
Three years ago, the number of students was less and hence other schools should not increase class size.E) The effects on students of learning in larger classes take at least three or four years to manifest themselves completely.
Again larger classes are not good.