Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 16:39 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 16:39

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 5330
Own Kudos [?]: 35486 [71]
Given Kudos: 9464
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42103 [22]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Director
Director
Joined: 20 Sep 2016
Posts: 560
Own Kudos [?]: 931 [11]
Given Kudos: 632
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GPA: 3.6
WE:Operations (Consumer Products)
Send PM
General Discussion
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Posts: 8018
Own Kudos [?]: 4096 [1]
Given Kudos: 242
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1:
545 Q79 V79 DI73
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: Developed by Pennsylvania's Palatine Germans about 1750, Conestoga [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
IMO D;
A) wagons, with high wheels capable of crossing rutted roads, muddy flats, and the nonroads of the prairie and they had a floor curved upward on either end so as to prevent ; modifer error

B) wagons, with high wheels capable of crossing rutted roads, muddy flats, and the nonroads of the prairie, and with a floor that was curved upward at both ends to prevent; same as A

C) wagons, which had high wheels capable of crossing rutted roads, muddy flats, and the nonroads of the prairie, and floors curved upward on their ends so that they prevented ; use of , which modifies conestoga wagons , but use of words 'floors, they prevented ' makes sentence akward as reference is not clear

E) wagons had high wheels capable of crossing rutted roads, muddy flats, and the nonroads of the prairie and floors curving upward at their ends so that it prevented ; referent it is wrong


D) wagons had high wheels capable of crossing rutted roads, muddy flats, and the nonroads of the prairie, and a floor that was curved upward at both ends to prevent; correct sentence ..



generis wrote:
Developed by Pennsylvania's Palatine Germans about 1750, Conestoga wagons, with high wheels capable of crossing rutted roads, muddy flats, and the nonroads of the prairie and they had a floor curved upward on either end so as to prevent cargo from shifting on steep grades.

A) wagons, with high wheels capable of crossing rutted roads, muddy flats, and the nonroads of the prairie and they had a floor curved upward on either end so as to prevent

B) wagons, with high wheels capable of crossing rutted roads, muddy flats, and the nonroads of the prairie, and with a floor that was curved upward at both ends to prevent

C) wagons, which had high wheels capable of crossing rutted roads, muddy flats, and the nonroads of the prairie, and floors curved upward on their ends so that they prevented

D) wagons had high wheels capable of crossing rutted roads, muddy flats, and the nonroads of the prairie, and a floor that was curved upward at both ends to prevent

E) wagons had high wheels capable of crossing rutted roads, muddy flats, and the nonroads of the prairie and floors curving upward at their ends so that it prevented

This official question is similar but not identical to an official question that can be found HERE.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Jul 2018
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 124
Send PM
Re: Developed by Pennsylvania's Palatine Germans about 1750, Conestoga [#permalink]
egmat Can you please explain why D is correct with your approach

Posted from my mobile device
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2019
Posts: 474
Own Kudos [?]: 342 [1]
Given Kudos: 28
Send PM
Developed by Pennsylvania's Palatine Germans about 1750, Conestoga [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Developed by Pennsylvania's Palatine Germans about 1750, Conestoga wagons, with high wheels capable of crossing rutted roads, muddy flats, and the nonroads of the prairie and they had a floor curved upward on either end so as to prevent cargo from shifting on steep grades.

A) wagons, with high wheels capable of crossing rutted roads, muddy flats, and the nonroads of the prairie and they had a floor curved upward on either end so as to prevent - the definite pronoun 'they' has no clear antecedent. Hence, eliminate (A)

B) wagons, with high wheels capable of crossing rutted roads, muddy flats, and the nonroads of the prairie, and with a floor that was curved upward at both ends to prevent - the overall structure of this sentence now becomes "Wagon, with......., and with......). This does not make any sense.

To understand why, let us use a parallel example that has this 'with' clause structure : My car, with a floor that was curved upward at both ends to prevent grocery bags from shifting on steep grades. - this does not make any sense whatsoever.

hence, eliminate (B)

C) wagons, which had high wheels capable of crossing rutted roads, muddy flats, and the nonroads of the prairie, and floors curved upward on their ends so that they prevented - The wagons had wheels.... and floors curved upward on their ends so that they prevented...??? This does not make any sense. Hence, eliminate (C)

D) wagons had high wheels capable of crossing rutted roads, muddy flats, and the nonroads of the prairie, and a floor that was curved upward at both ends to prevent - Has no error. Hence, (D) is the right answer choice.

E) wagons had high wheels capable of crossing rutted roads, muddy flats, and the nonroads of the prairie and floors curving upward at their ends so that it prevented - 'their' has no clear antecedent. hence, eliminate (E)
Director
Director
Joined: 29 Apr 2019
Status:Learning
Posts: 751
Own Kudos [?]: 583 [0]
Given Kudos: 49
Send PM
Developed by Pennsylvania's Palatine Germans about 1750, Conestoga [#permalink]
Intended meaning:
- Conestoga wagons developed by Pennsylvania's Palatine Germans about 1750
- Conestoga wagons had high wheels and a floor
- Conestoga wagons is capable of crossing rutted roads, muddy flats, and the nonroads of the prairie, becasue of high wheels
- Contoga wagons had a floor that was curved upward at both ends to prevent cargo from shifting on steep grades

Learning :
1. Modifier - Error in A, B and C
"Developed by Pennsylvania's Palatine Germans about 1750" - Modify - "Conestoga wagons"

2. Verb Tense - Error in C, and E
- had High wheels
- had a floor, not floors
- to prevent cargo, not prevented cargo

3. (,which) non-essential information, (that) essential information

4. Pronoun Error - Option A, and C
- Conestoga wagons is singular,
Pronoun "they / their" plural is not correct antecedent
Pronoun "It" singular is correct antecedent
- Conestoga wagons was not with High wheels and a floor, It had high wheels and a floor

5. Information between two comma - Error A, and B
In option A, and B "Conestoga wagons" mentioned between two comma,
indicate this as a type of additional information wherelse it the main subject, hence makes this as a Modifier error.

6. Article "a", "an" and "the" - Error in C, and E to decribe "floor"


Option A.) Developed by Pennsylvania's Palatine Germans about 1750, Conestoga wagons,
with high wheels capable of crossing rutted roads, muddy flats, and the nonroads of the prairie
and
they had a floor curved upward on either end so as to prevent
cargo from shifting on steep grades.


Option B) Developed by Pennsylvania's Palatine Germans about 1750, Conestoga wagons,
with high wheels capable of crossing rutted roads, muddy flats, and the nonroads of the prairie,
and
with a floor that was curved upward at both ends to prevent
cargo from shifting on steep grades


Option C) Developed by Pennsylvania's Palatine Germans about 1750,
Conestoga wagons, which had
- high wheels capable of crossing rutted roads, muddy flats, and the nonroads of the prairie,
and
- floors curved upward on their ends so that they prevented
cargo from shifting on steep grades


Correct Option D) Developed by Pennsylvania's Palatine Germans about 1750,
Conestoga wagons had
- high wheels capable of crossing rutted roads, muddy flats, and the nonroads of the prairie,
and
- a floor that was curved upward at both ends to prevent
cargo from shifting on steep grades


Option E) Developed by Pennsylvania's Palatine Germans about 1750,
Conestoga wagons had
- high wheels capable of crossing rutted roads, muddy flats, and the nonroads of the prairie
and
- floors curving upward at their ends so that it prevented
cargo from shifting on steep grades
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2021
Status:In learning mode...
Posts: 156
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 217
Location: India
GMAT 1: 600 Q46 V27
Send PM
Re: Developed by Pennsylvania's Palatine Germans about 1750, Conestoga [#permalink]
hello experts,
I wanted to know, the use of 'so as to' and 'so that' is justified here.
I think we use so that - to show a degree. example - so high that....
it seems like both indicates an intention of "the floor/floors"

why exactly are they wrong?
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6920
Own Kudos [?]: 63658 [3]
Given Kudos: 1773
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Developed by Pennsylvania's Palatine Germans about 1750, Conestoga [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Expert Reply
dcoolguy wrote:
hello experts,
I wanted to know, the use of 'so as to' and 'so that' is justified here.
I think we use so that - to show a degree. example - so high that....
it seems like both indicates an intention of "the floor/floors"

why exactly are they wrong?

Better question: do (A), (C), and (E) have other, more concrete issues?

Let's start with (A). If we strip out a few modifiers for a moment, we're left with:

Quote:
Conestoga wagons, and they had a floor curved upward on either end so as to prevent cargo from shifting on steep grades.

We're missing a verb for "Conestoga wagons," so we can eliminate (A) right away.

In choice (C), notice that everything after "Conestoga wagons" is just one big "which" clause:

Quote:
Conestoga wagons, which had (1) high wheels {...}, and (2) floors curved upward on their ends {...}."

So again, we're missing a verb for "Conestoga wagons," and we can eliminate (C) right away.

(E) has a pretty glaring pronoun issue (what does "it" refer to?), so we can eliminate that one too.

So... did the GMAT really want us to worry about "so that" and "so as to"? Not really, and I wouldn't try to invent rules about when you can (or cannot) use those phrases. That said, I think we're used to seeing sentences where "so that"/"so as to" link two distinct clauses/actions. For example:

    "Tim sold his house so that he could buy a yacht."

Notice that the "so that" part tells us more about the first clause or action. Why did Tim sell his house? So that he could buy a yacht. Seems fine.

Now look at the relevant part of (C) again:

Quote:
[Conestoga wagons] {...} had floors curved upward on their ends so that [the floors] prevented cargo from shifting on steep grades.

Given the usage of "so that" demonstrated in the yacht example, it would be perfectly understandable to misread this as, "[Conestoga wagons] had floors {...} so that [the floors] prevented cargo from shifting on steep grades." In other words, we might be inclined to think that "so that" links the two clauses, just as it does in the yacht example. But in (C), the "so that" doesn't go with another clause or action. Instead, it just modifies an -ed modifier ("curved").

Does that mean "so that" is wrong in (C)? I'm not sure, but based on the ideas underneath the yacht example, I'd argue that the simple "to prevent" in (D) is clearer than the "so that they prevented" in (C). Would I eliminate (C) based only on that decision point? Nope. But, given the missing verb issue described above, I'd see this as an extra reason to feel good about ditching (C).[/list]

TL/DR: SC isn't about inventing a list of grammar rules that you can blindly apply to future problems. Look for definite errors first, and then think hard about how the remaining differences affect the meaning and clarity.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17213
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Developed by Pennsylvania's Palatine Germans about 1750, Conestoga [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Developed by Pennsylvania's Palatine Germans about 1750, Conestoga [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne