Youraisemeup wrote:
Dillworth: More and more people are deciding not to have children because ofthe personal and economic sacrifices children require and because so often children are ungrateful for the considerable sacrifices their parents do make for them. However, such considerations have no bearing on the fact that their children provide the best chance most people have of ensuring that their values live on after them. Therefore, for anyone with deeply held values, foregoing parenthood out of reluctance to make sacrifices for which little gratitude can be expected would probably be a mistake,
Travers: Your reasoning ignores another fact that deserves consideration: children's ingratitude for parental sacrifices usually stems from a wholesale rejection of parental values.
Dillworth employs which one of the following argumentative strategies?
(A) showing that considerations cited as drawbacks to a given course of action are not really drawbacks at all
(B) exposing as morally suspect the motives of people who would make the choice that Dillworth rejects
(C) indirectly establishing that a given course of action is obligatory by arguing that the alternative course of action is prohibited
(D) distinguishing a category of person for whom the reason presented in favor of a given course of action is more telling than the reasons cited against that course of action
(E) using evidence that a certain course of action would be appropriate under one set of conditions to arrive at a general conclusion about what would be appropriate in all cases
Took a total of 2.5 mins, let's look at the answer choices directly now
(A) showing that considerations cited as drawbacks to a given course of action are not really drawbacks at all [/b] Author never mentioned any drawbacks of not having children in the argument, rather he just put forth the reasoning on why even with hardships raising children is worthwhile [/b]
(B) exposing as morally suspect the motives of people who would make the choice that Dillworth rejects
For some reason, I was stuck with this one, but when compared with a correct answer this was easy to eliminate, and now while writing this analysis and having read the argument again, the author states that not raising children would be a mistake but never questioned the morality of anyone in the argument (C) indirectly establishing that a given course of action is obligatory by arguing that the alternative course of action is prohibited
Completely out of the blue, he never mentioned anything as obligatory or prohibitive in the argument (D) distinguishing a category of person for whom the reason presented in favor of a given course of action is more telling than the reasons cited against that course of action
To be honest, I didn't grasp what this meant completely, so let's hold on it and try to come back after evaluating, E, given this is the only option left, this is our answer (E) using evidence that a certain course of action would be appropriate under one set of conditions to arrive at a general conclusion about what would be appropriate in all cases
No evidence of any sort were provided in the argument, so this is easy to eliminate, which leaves us only D which we didn't grasp, so that must be the answer