Events & Promotions
Last visit was: 16 Jul 2025, 00:40 |
It is currently 16 Jul 2025, 00:40 |
|
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
09:30 AM EDT
-11:30 AM EDT
11:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
01:00 PM EDT
-02:00 PM EDT
10:00 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
11:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EDT
Difficulty:
Question Stats:
72% (02:46) correctHistory
The ecologist faults community planners generally for not considering the effect of converting land to industrial or residential use. | |
The economist would allow road construction to proceed even if it would threaten sensitive ecosystems. | |
Both the economist and ecologist offer guidance for planners who are considering whether to undertake road construction projects. | |
Both the economist and the ecologist consider the regional economic impacts of road construction projects. | |
Neither the economist nor the ecologist provides clear criteria for determining whether a road project should be undertaken. |
Difficulty:
Question Stats:
62% (00:58) correctHistory
Yes | No | |
The economist is more intent on endorsing road construction projects than the ecologist is. | ||
The economist and the ecologist are both concerned with the criteria on which community planners base decisions. | ||
The ecologist is concerned with how road projects can affect the quality of life within communities, whereas the economist is not. |
Difficulty:
Question Stats:
61% (01:08) correctHistory
Acceptable | Not Acceptable | |
The road’s planned route could be altered to avoid the sensitive ecosystem at no additional cost. | ||
The road would provide a significant economic benefit to neighboring communities. | ||
Mitigating the threat to the sensitive ecosystem would cost an additional $1 million. |