GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 12 Dec 2018, 13:12

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
  • The winning strategy for 700+ on the GMAT

     December 13, 2018

     December 13, 2018

     08:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    What people who reach the high 700's do differently? We're going to share insights, tips and strategies from data we collected on over 50,000 students who used examPAL.
  • GMATbuster's Weekly GMAT Quant Quiz, Tomorrow, Saturday at 9 AM PST

     December 14, 2018

     December 14, 2018

     09:00 AM PST

     10:00 AM PST

    10 Questions will be posted on the forum and we will post a reply in this Topic with a link to each question. There are prizes for the winners.

During the 1980s, many economic historians studying Latin America fo

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Director
User avatar
B
Status: I don't stop when I'm Tired,I stop when I'm done
Joined: 11 May 2014
Posts: 537
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Finance, Leadership
GPA: 2.81
WE: Business Development (Real Estate)
During the 1980s, many economic historians studying Latin America fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jul 2016, 12:37
11
Top Contributor
11
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 1146 sessions

84% (02:30) correct 16% (02:44) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 1097 sessions

80% (01:03) correct 20% (01:29) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 1093 sessions

59% (01:59) correct 41% (01:58) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Line
    During the 1980s, many economic historians
    studying Latin America focused on the impact of
    the Great Depression of the 1930s. Most of these
    historians argued that although the Depression
(5)
    began earlier in Latin America than in the United
    States, it was less severe in Latin America and did
    not significantly impede industrial growth there.
    The historians’ argument was grounded in national
    government records concerning tax revenues and
(10)
    exports and in government-sponsored industrial
    censuses, from which historians have drawn
    conclusions about total manufacturing output
    and profit levels across Latin America. However,
    economic statistics published by Latin American
(15)
    governments in the early twentieth century are
    neither reliable nor consistent; this is especially
    true of manufacturing data, which were gathered
    from factory owners for taxation purposes and
    which therefore may well be distorted. Moreover,
(20)
    one cannot assume a direct correlation between
    the output level and the profit level of a given
    industry as these variables often move in opposite
    directions. Finally, national and regional economies
    are composed of individual firms and industries,
(25)
    and relying on general, sweeping economic
    indicators may mask substantial variations among
    these different enterprises. For example, recent
    analyses of previously unexamined data on textile
    manufacturing in Brazil and Mexico suggest that the
(30)
    Great Depression had a more severe impact on this
    Latin American industry than scholars
    had recognized.
(Book Question: 460)
The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. compare the impact of the Great Depression on Latin America with its impact on the United States
B. criticize a school of economic historians for failing to analyze the Great Depression in Latin America within a global context
C. illustrate the risks inherent in comparing different types of economic enterprises to explain economic phenomena
D. call into question certain scholars’ views concerning the severity of the Great Depression in Latin America
E. demonstrate that the Great Depression had a more severe impact on industry in Latin America than in certain other regions


(Book Question: 461)
Which of the following conclusions about the Great Depression is best supported by the passage?
A. It did not impede Latin American industrial growth as much as historians had previously thought.
B. It had a more severe impact on the Brazilian and the Mexican textile industries than it had on Latin America as a region.
C. It affected the Latin American textile industry more severely than it did any other industry in Latin America.
D. The overall impact on Latin American industrial growth should be reevaluated by economic historians.
E. Its impact on Latin America should not be compared with its impact on the United States


(Book Question: 462)
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the author’s assertion regarding economic indicators in lines 25–27 ?
A. During an economic depression, European textile manufacturers’ profits rise while their industrial output remains steady.
B. During a national economic recession, United States microchips manufacturers’ profits rise sharply while United States steel manufacturers’ profits plunge.
C. During the years following a severe economic depression, textile manufacturers’ output levels and profit levels increase in Brazil and Mexico but not in the rest of Latin America.
D. Although Japanese industry as a whole recovers after an economic recession, it does not regain its previously high levels of production.
E. While European industrial output increases in the years following an economic depression, total output remains below that of Japan or the United States.




OG 2019 ID's:
RC00333-01
RC00333-02
RC00333-04

_________________

Md. Abdur Rakib

Please Press +1 Kudos,If it helps
Sentence Correction-Collection of Ron Purewal's "elliptical construction/analogies" for SC Challenges

Most Helpful Community Reply
SC Moderator
User avatar
D
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1687
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
GPA: 4
WE: Analyst (Retail)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: During the 1980s, many economic historians studying Latin America fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jul 2016, 21:26
7
1) The primary purpose of the passage is to

A. compare the impact of the Great Depression on Latin America with its impact on the United States - Incorrect. The passage does not compare the impact of Great Depression on Latin America with other nations. Rather the passage is focused on the impact of Great Depression on the industrial growth in Latin America.

B. criticize a school of economic historians for failing to analyze the Great Depression in Latin America within a global context - Incorrect. Global context?

C. illustrate the risks inherent in comparing different types of economic enterprises to explain economic phenomena - Incorrect. Out of context

D. call into question certain scholars’ views concerning the severity of the Great Depression in Latin America - Correct

E. demonstrate that the Great Depression had a more severe impact on industry in Latin America than in certain other regions - Incorrect. Same reason as A. The passage does not compare the impact of GD in Latin America with other regions.

Answer: D

2) Which of the following conclusions about the Great Depression is best supported by the passage?

Refer: Historians think that GD was less severe in Latin America and did not significantly impede industrial growth. The passage provides reasons to disprove the view of the historians.

Answer: D

3) Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the author’s assertion regarding economic indicators in lines 25–27 ?

Refer: "Finally, national and regional economies are composed of individual firms and industries, and relying on general, sweeping economic indicators may mask substantial variations among these different enterprises."

A. During an economic depression, European textile manufacturers’ profits rise while their industrial output remains steady. - Incorrect. Focus is only on textile manufacturers.

B. During a national economic recession, United States microchips manufacturers’ profits rise sharply while United States steel manufacturers’ profits plunge. - Correct. We have two different industries: Microchip and steel. There is a variation between the 2 industries profits.

C. During the years following a severe economic depression, textile manufacturers’ output levels and profit levels increase in Brazil and Mexico but not in the rest of Latin America. - Incorrect. Only textile manufacturers are considered.

D. Although Japanese industry as a whole recovers after an economic recession, it does not regain its previously high levels of production. - Incorrect. Japanese industry as a whole is considered.

E. While European industrial output increases in the years following an economic depression, total output remains below that of Japan or the United States. - Incorrect. Same reason as before.

Answer: B
General Discussion
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 17 Oct 2014
Posts: 4
Re: During the 1980s, many economic historians studying Latin America fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2017, 05:56
1
Vyshak wrote:
1) The primary purpose of the passage is to

A. compare the impact of the Great Depression on Latin America with its impact on the United States - Incorrect. The passage does not compare the impact of Great Depression on Latin America with other nations. Rather the passage is focused on the impact of Great Depression on the industrial growth in Latin America.

B. criticize a school of economic historians for failing to analyze the Great Depression in Latin America within a global context - Incorrect. Global context?

C. illustrate the risks inherent in comparing different types of economic enterprises to explain economic phenomena - Incorrect. Out of context

D. call into question certain scholars’ views concerning the severity of the Great Depression in Latin America - Correct

E. demonstrate that the Great Depression had a more severe impact on industry in Latin America than in certain other regions - Incorrect. Same reason as A. The passage does not compare the impact of GD in Latin America with other regions.

Answer: D

2) Which of the following conclusions about the Great Depression is best supported by the passage?

Refer: Historians think that GD was less severe in Latin America and did not significantly impede industrial growth. The passage provides reasons to disprove the view of the historians.

Answer: D

3) Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the author’s assertion regarding economic indicators in lines 25–27 ?

Refer: "Finally, national and regional economies are composed of individual firms and industries, and relying on general, sweeping economic indicators may mask substantial variations among these different enterprises."

A. During an economic depression, European textile manufacturers’ profits rise while their industrial output remains steady. - Incorrect. Focus is only on textile manufacturers.

B. During a national economic recession, United States microchips manufacturers’ profits rise sharply while United States steel manufacturers’ profits plunge. - Correct. We have two different industries: Microchip and steel. There is a variation between the 2 industries profits.

C. During the years following a severe economic depression, textile manufacturers’ output levels and profit levels increase in Brazil and Mexico but not in the rest of Latin America. - Incorrect. Only textile manufacturers are considered.

D. Although Japanese industry as a whole recovers after an economic recession, it does not regain its previously high levels of production. - Incorrect. Japanese industry as a whole is considered.

E. While European industrial output increases in the years following an economic depression, total output remains below that of Japan or the United States. - Incorrect. Same reason as before.

Answer: B



I am unable to figure out how AO is B in question no. 3? The passage talks about the US only in the beginning and nowhere mentions about steel and microchip industry of the US.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 24 Jan 2017
Posts: 58
Re: During the 1980s, many economic historians studying Latin America fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jul 2017, 02:02
sanjana90 wrote:
Vyshak wrote:
1) The primary purpose of the passage is to

A. compare the impact of the Great Depression on Latin America with its impact on the United States - Incorrect. The passage does not compare the impact of Great Depression on Latin America with other nations. Rather the passage is focused on the impact of Great Depression on the industrial growth in Latin America.

B. criticize a school of economic historians for failing to analyze the Great Depression in Latin America within a global context - Incorrect. Global context?

C. illustrate the risks inherent in comparing different types of economic enterprises to explain economic phenomena - Incorrect. Out of context

D. call into question certain scholars’ views concerning the severity of the Great Depression in Latin America - Correct

E. demonstrate that the Great Depression had a more severe impact on industry in Latin America than in certain other regions - Incorrect. Same reason as A. The passage does not compare the impact of GD in Latin America with other regions.

Answer: D

2) Which of the following conclusions about the Great Depression is best supported by the passage?

Refer: Historians think that GD was less severe in Latin America and did not significantly impede industrial growth. The passage provides reasons to disprove the view of the historians.

Answer: D

3) Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the author’s assertion regarding economic indicators in lines 25–27 ?

Refer: "Finally, national and regional economies are composed of individual firms and industries, and relying on general, sweeping economic indicators may mask substantial variations among these different enterprises."

A. During an economic depression, European textile manufacturers’ profits rise while their industrial output remains steady. - Incorrect. Focus is only on textile manufacturers.

B. During a national economic recession, United States microchips manufacturers’ profits rise sharply while United States steel manufacturers’ profits plunge. - Correct. We have two different industries: Microchip and steel. There is a variation between the 2 industries profits.

C. During the years following a severe economic depression, textile manufacturers’ output levels and profit levels increase in Brazil and Mexico but not in the rest of Latin America. - Incorrect. Only textile manufacturers are considered.

D. Although Japanese industry as a whole recovers after an economic recession, it does not regain its previously high levels of production. - Incorrect. Japanese industry as a whole is considered.

E. While European industrial output increases in the years following an economic depression, total output remains below that of Japan or the United States. - Incorrect. Same reason as before.

Answer: B



I am unable to figure out how AO is B in question no. 3? The passage talks about the US only in the beginning and nowhere mentions about steel and microchip industry of the US.


The question only asks for a strengthener of the argument in lines 25-27 - that economic indicators such as profits vary among different industries.
Only choice B mentioned 2 different industries (steel and manufacturing) with varying economic indicators.

The passage does not have to talk about the answer choices in order for them to be correct. Same as what we have learned in critical reasoning, a strengthener should be new information not previously stated in the question stimulus.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
S
Joined: 23 Nov 2016
Posts: 10
Re: During the 1980s, many economic historians studying Latin America fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jul 2017, 06:42
6
sanjana90 wrote:
Vyshak wrote:
1) The primary purpose of the passage is to






Answer: B



I am unable to figure out how AO is B in question no. 3? The passage talks about the US only in the beginning and nowhere mentions about steel and microchip industry of the US.


This is an analogy Question (type).
You need to find out what the given condition / situation is , here it is- sweeping economic
indicators may mask substantial variations among
these different enterprises
.
Now we need to use this idea to find our analogy.
Only in option B. Different enterprises are being talked about (United States microchips manufacturers& United States steel manufacturers) and the substantial variations . Ones profits rise sharply and the others plunge.
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2125
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: During the 1980s, many economic historians studying Latin America fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Nov 2017, 09:31
nice passage , took 6 mins 30 seconds, including 2 mins 30 seconds to read the passage . All correct
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1223
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: During the 1980s, many economic historians studying Latin America fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Nov 2017, 07:32
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
P
Joined: 13 Oct 2016
Posts: 286
Concentration: Operations, Leadership
GMAT 1: 600 Q44 V28
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: During the 1980s, many economic historians studying Latin America fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Dec 2017, 08:48
Time taken - 7 mins

Got 2/3 correct. Missed the global context part while reading the options quickly and hence marked B as the answer choice for 1st ques
_________________

_______________________________________________
If you appreciate the post then please click +1Kudos :)

Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 27 Dec 2016
Posts: 237
Concentration: Marketing, Social Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.65
WE: Marketing (Education)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: During the 1980s, many economic historians studying Latin America fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Dec 2017, 22:07
Spent 5 minutes 31 sec; though wrong on the last question :cry: :cry:
_________________

There's an app for that - Steve Jobs.

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 11 May 2018
Posts: 92
Location: India
GMAT 1: 460 Q42 V14
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: During the 1980s, many economic historians studying Latin America fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jun 2018, 22:42
*IN THE LAST QUESTION*
So we have chosen B as it is the only option that is talking about different enterprises .....and remaining are not having different enterprise analogies?

Please correct me if my understanding of the poe is wrong
_________________

If you want to Thank me Give me a KUDOS
"I’ve spent months preparing for the day I’d face you. I’ve come a long way, GMAT"- SonGoku

Study Buddy Forum Moderator
User avatar
D
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 1268
Location: India
WE: Engineering (Other)
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: During the 1980s, many economic historians studying Latin America fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jul 2018, 08:32
generis ammuseeru nightblade354 pikolo2510
GMATNinja KarishmaB

Can anyone explain (Book Question: 462)
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the author’s assertion regarding economic indicators in lines 25–27 ?
A. During an economic depression, European textile manufacturers’ profits rise while their industrial output remains steady.
B. During a national economic recession, United States microchips manufacturers’ profits rise sharply while United States steel manufacturers’ profits plunge.
C. During the years following a severe economic depression, textile manufacturers’ output levels and profit levels increase in Brazil and Mexico but not in the rest of Latin America.
D. Although Japanese industry as a whole recovers after an economic recession, it does not regain its previously high levels of production.
E. While European industrial output increases in the years following an economic depression, total output remains below that of Japan or the United States.

I failed to identify the main conclusion and supporting premise here.
I understood below:
    Author seems to be disagreeing with historians that
  • Great depression was was less severe in Latin America than in US
    and did not significantly impede industrial growth there

    Supporting premise used by author against historians
  • The premise used by historians ie economic statistics are neither accurate
    nor reliable

    Additional supporting premise used by author against historians
  • one cannot assume a direct correlation between
    the output level and the profit level of a given
    industry as these variables often move in opposite
    directions

I could not proceed further.
_________________

It's the journey that brings us happiness not the destination.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
P
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Posts: 377
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: During the 1980s, many economic historians studying Latin America fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jul 2018, 16:01
1
adkikani wrote:
generis ammuseeru nightblade354 pikolo2510
GMATNinja KarishmaB

Can anyone explain (Book Question: 462)
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the author’s assertion regarding economic indicators in lines 25–27 ?
A. During an economic depression, European textile manufacturers’ profits rise while their industrial output remains steady.
B. During a national economic recession, United States microchips manufacturers’ profits rise sharply while United States steel manufacturers’ profits plunge.
C. During the years following a severe economic depression, textile manufacturers’ output levels and profit levels increase in Brazil and Mexico but not in the rest of Latin America.
D. Although Japanese industry as a whole recovers after an economic recession, it does not regain its previously high levels of production.
E. While European industrial output increases in the years following an economic depression, total output remains below that of Japan or the United States.

I failed to identify the main conclusion and supporting premise here.
I understood below:
    Author seems to be disagreeing with historians that
  • Great depression was was less severe in Latin America than in US
    and did not significantly impede industrial growth there

    Supporting premise used by author against historians
  • The premise used by historians ie economic statistics are neither accurate
    nor reliable

    Additional supporting premise used by author against historians
  • one cannot assume a direct correlation between
    the output level and the profit level of a given
    industry as these variables often move in opposite
    directions

I could not proceed further.


What i understood is

As per historians, great depression was less severe in Latin America than USA and great depression didn't delay Industrial Growth in Latin America.
Historians used data from National government records and government-sponsored industrial censuses to claim their assertion.

National Government Records--> Tax revenues and Exports
Government-sponsored industrial censuses--> Total Manufacturing Output and Profit Levels.

But as per Author, Historians claim is not reliable and not consistent.
Author specifically points out that Historian claim is not valid for MANUFACTURING DATA.

Then Author says:
1. Manufacturing data may be distorted
2. CANNOT assume a direct correlation between the output level and the profit level of a given industry. These variables often move in opposite directions.
3. National and Regional Economies are consist of Individual firms and Industry. Economic Indicator, which is very wide, may hide substantial variation among DIFFERENT Firms/Enterprises.

Then Author gives example of textile manufacturing of Brazil and Mexico and says GD has more impact in Latin America than historians considered.

adkikani to your question, please note "DIFFERENT Enterprises" which author mentioned in 3rd point. Only option B considers two different firms i.e. USA microchips manufacturers’ and USA steel manufacturers profits’
Other options talk about one industry only. So option B is correct.
Study Buddy Forum Moderator
User avatar
D
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 1268
Location: India
WE: Engineering (Other)
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: During the 1980s, many economic historians studying Latin America fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jul 2018, 19:23
Thanks ammuseeru for your two cents. I have a small f/u query.
You wrote:
Quote:
3. National and Regional Economies are consist of Individual firms and Industry. Economic Indicator, which is very wide, may hide substantial variation among DIFFERENT Firms/Enterprises.


And here is (B) again
Quote:
B. During a national economic recession, United States microchips manufacturers’ profits rise sharply while United States steel manufacturers’ profits plunge .


How did you link the underlined part in your quote with (B) ?
Your reply shall help in inferring the context of (B) from the perspective of passage.
_________________

It's the journey that brings us happiness not the destination.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
P
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Posts: 377
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: During the 1980s, many economic historians studying Latin America fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jul 2018, 19:33
1
adkikani wrote:
Thanks ammuseeru for your two cents. I have a small f/u query.
You wrote:
Quote:
3. National and Regional Economies are consist of Individual firms and Industry. Economic Indicator, which is very wide, may hide substantial variation among DIFFERENT Firms/Enterprises.


And here is (B) again
Quote:
B. During a national economic recession, United States microchips manufacturers’ profits rise sharply while United States steel manufacturers’ profits plunge .


How did you link the underlined part in your quote with (B) ?
Your reply shall help in inferring the context of (B) from the perspective of passage.



Different Enterprises: Microchip and steel.
Variations: 2 Industries Profits.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Posts: 239
GMAT 1: 670 Q46 V36
Re: During the 1980s, many economic historians studying Latin America fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Oct 2018, 14:15
Got 3/3 correct but took 8 minutes including 4 min to read the passage!
_________________

Most Comprehensive Article on How to Score a 700+ on the GMAT (NEW)
Verb Tenses Simplified

If you found my post useful, KUDOS are much appreciated. Giving Kudos is a great way to thank and motivate contributors, without costing you anything.

GMAT Club Bot
Re: During the 1980s, many economic historians studying Latin America fo &nbs [#permalink] 11 Oct 2018, 14:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by

During the 1980s, many economic historians studying Latin America fo

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.