Last visit was: 04 Oct 2024, 05:49 It is currently 04 Oct 2024, 05:49
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Joined: 17 May 2015
Posts: 198
Own Kudos [?]: 3251 [11]
Given Kudos: 85
Send PM
Retired Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 383
Own Kudos [?]: 342 [1]
Given Kudos: 144
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GPA: 4
WE:Engineering (Telecommunications)
Send PM
Joined: 01 Jun 2015
Posts: 159
Own Kudos [?]: 316 [0]
Given Kudos: 197
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V26
Send PM
Joined: 01 Feb 2015
Posts: 58
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [0]
Given Kudos: 49
Send PM
Re: Ecologist: One theory attributes the ability of sea butterflies [#permalink]
warriorguy
Option D -

the compounds together would have had a strong effect than considered individually. D points out that flaw.

Would like to know a strong reason to eliminate B? As per the stem, the author has not given any statistical correlation. So B is not very accurate; however, it draws our attention to the cause <--> effect funda.
Can someone explain how D is the answer?

There is some compound being produced by butterflies. And, that compound is tested by putting on each pellet. What is the difference between an individual compound and combined compound?

Sent from my Redmi Note 3 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Joined: 22 May 2017
Posts: 85
Own Kudos [?]: 113 [0]
Given Kudos: 105
Send PM
Re: Ecologist: One theory attributes the ability of sea butterflies [#permalink]
yes C is a tempting trap
I go with D as it directly shows the flaw in the conclusion assumed by splitting the compounds and experimenting whereas C deals with the assumption part of the theory 'while another attributes this ability to various chemical compounds they produce'
Joined: 01 Feb 2015
Posts: 58
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [0]
Given Kudos: 49
Send PM
Re: Ecologist: One theory attributes the ability of sea butterflies [#permalink]
akshata19
yes C is a tempting trap
I go with D as it directly shows the flaw in the conclusion assumed by splitting the compounds and experimenting whereas C deals with the assumption part of the theory 'while another attributes this ability to various chemical compounds they produce'


Can you explain what the option C means?
Thanks!
Joined: 26 Sep 2017
Status:To infinity and beyond
Posts: 215
Own Kudos [?]: 536 [3]
Given Kudos: 34
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
GPA: 3.31
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Ecologist: One theory attributes the ability of sea butterflies [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
ganand
Ecologist: One theory attributes the ability of sea butterflies to avoid predation to their appearance, while another attributes this ability to various chemical compounds they produce. Recently we added each of the compounds to food pellets, one compound per pellet. Predators ate the pellets no matter which one of the compounds was present. Thus the compounds the sea butterflies produce are not responsible for their ability to avoid predation.

The reasoning in the ecologist’s argument is flawed in that the argument

(A) presumes, without providing justification, that the two theories are incompatible with each other

(B) draws a conclusion about a cause on the basis of nothing more than a statistical correlation

(C) treats a condition sufficient for sea butterflies’ ability to avoid predators as a condition required for this ability

(D) infers, from the claim that no individual member of a set has a certain effect, that the set as a whole does not have that effect

(E) draws a conclusion that merely restates material present in one or more of its premises

Source: LSAT

Test was done with the individual chemical compounds.We do not know what would happen if multiple compounds were mixed together. D states the same.Hence the answer.
Joined: 28 Sep 2020
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Send PM
Re: Ecologist: One theory attributes the ability of sea butterflies [#permalink]
1
Kudos
C is out of scope, as the conclusion is not based on the condition sufficient / required for predators to behave certain way.
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Posts: 1322
Own Kudos [?]: 869 [0]
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
Send PM
Re: Ecologist: One theory attributes the ability of sea butterflies [#permalink]
Chef
akshata19
yes C is a tempting trap
I go with D as it directly shows the flaw in the conclusion assumed by splitting the compounds and experimenting whereas C deals with the assumption part of the theory 'while another attributes this ability to various chemical compounds they produce'


Can you explain what the option C means?
Thanks!

Quote:
(C) treats a condition sufficient for sea butterflies’ ability to avoid predators as a condition required for this ability
treats a condition sufficient for sea butterflies’ ability to avoid predators as a condition required for this ability
Treats condition sufficient as condition required

Example1: P-->Q; P maybe sufficient to result in Q .but P may not be a required condition
Example2: Red+ Blue --> Purple; Red is a required color to make a purple but red is not sufficient

Ability to various chemical compounds maybe be sufficient but it may not be required
ability to various colors or many other factors ---> avoid predators
ability of various color is just one of many factors that can avoid predator.


But for this argument, flaw is that ecologist thinks if something is applicable for A, it may also be applicable for B. Hence D is correct; not C.
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Posts: 1232
Own Kudos [?]: 217 [1]
Given Kudos: 332
Send PM
Re: Ecologist: One theory attributes the ability of sea butterflies [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Ecologist: One theory attributes the ability of sea butterflies to avoid predation to their appearance, while another attributes this ability to various chemical compounds they produce. Recently we added each of the compounds to food pellets, one compound per pellet. Predators ate the pellets no matter which one of the compounds was present. Thus the compounds the sea butterflies produce are not responsible for their ability to avoid predation.

The reasoning in the ecologist’s argument is flawed in that the argument


(A) presumes, without providing justification, that the two theories are incompatible with each other X
-justification was certainly provided

(B) draws a conclusion about a cause on the basis of nothing more than a statistical correlation X
-nothing about correlation exists in the passage

(C) treats a condition sufficient for sea butterflies’ ability to avoid predators as a condition required for this ability X
-the author does not treat any condition as 'required'

(D) infers, from the claim that no individual member of a set has a certain effect, that the set as a whole does not have that effect
CORRECT. The author inferred on the basis of a select few predators, that all of the predators would not avoid the pellets.

(E) draws a conclusion that merely restates material present in one or more of its premises X
-the author didn't do this.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17817
Own Kudos [?]: 884 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Ecologist: One theory attributes the ability of sea butterflies [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Ecologist: One theory attributes the ability of sea butterflies [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7080 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
CR Forum Moderator
824 posts