DIII
I understand that we can omit words till it becomes ambiguous, but can you give me the proper explanation for not omitting words even when it's not ambiguous?
Eg:
(ST2: The practice took in 500$ more in revenue than last year).
The GMAT would claim that this
is 'ambiguous'. (Which is fairly silly, in my opinion, since you and I both understand what the sentence is trying to communicate.) The problem is that you could read it as a comparison between a noun 'revenue' and a noun phrase 'last year', which is a nonsensical comparison. In other words, they say you could read it as being the same as this sentence:
I made 10$ more per hour from
my day job than
my evening job.
The practice took in 500$ more in
revenue than
last year.
Or, you could technically read it as a comparison between 'the practice' and 'last year':
John made 500$ more in tips than
Miriam.
The practice took in 500$ more in revenue than
last year.
In order to make it totally clear that you don't want the sentence to be read in those ways, you have to add in a few words ('it did'). That clarifies that you're comparing the amount that was made, not the year itself.
This is based on a problem from
the Official Guide, by the way.