GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 20 Jul 2018, 19:10

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: struggling with GMAT
Joined: 06 Dec 2012
Posts: 169
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Accounting
GMAT Date: 04-06-2013
GPA: 3.65
Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Mar 2013, 04:01
2
9
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

57% (01:23) correct 43% (01:48) wrong based on 256 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.

In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first assesses the goal held by certain environmental organization; the second presents the logical goal that the reasoning concludes should be adopted instead.

(B) The first assesses the goal held by certain environmental organization; the second presents the strategy that the reasoning concludes has the best chance of reaching that goal.

(C) The first is the conclusion reached about one strategy for attaining a certain goal; the second presents the strategy that the reasoning advocates.

(D) The first is the main conclusion toward which the reasoning is directed; the second presents a strategy that is called sensible but for which no support is offered.

(E) The first is the main conclusion toward which the reasoning is directed; the second is a consideration raised in order to support that conclusion

Similar Question : Different Boldface LINK
1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
User avatar
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1098
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Mar 2013, 04:16
1
2
Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. (goal of the organization)
They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it.(how they plan to do so)
(in this part a fact is presented, no personal opinion is expressed)
That plan is ill-conceived:(as you can see here starts the reasoning of the author, and it starts with its CONCLUSION, which is going to be explained in the next part)
if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders.(reason for the conclusion)
On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. (a problem is presented)
But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires.(another personal consideration that is leading to the conclusion in the last sentence)
And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.
(the author gives his own method to solve the main problem expressed in line 1)

In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?

(A)The first assesses the goal held by certain environmental organization;the second presents the logical goal that the reasoning concludes should be adopted instead
(B)The first assesses the goal held by certain environmental organization:the second presents the strategy that the reasoning concludes has the best chance of reaching that goal.
A and B are wrong: the first one is the conclusion.

(C)The first is the conclusion reached about one strategy for attaining a certain goal ; the second presents the strategy that the reasoning advocates
CORRECT
(D)The first is the main conclusion toward which the reasoning is directed;The second presents a strategy that is called sensible but for which no support is offered.
Support IS offered for the strategy. (second to last line)
(E)The first is the main conclusion toward which the reasoning is directed;The second is a consideration raised in order to support that conclusion
The second is an alternative strategy, not a consideration
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 86
Schools: Haas '16, AGSM '16
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Apr 2015, 06:30
1st: state the goal to achieve
2nd: plan o achieve that goal
3rd: assesses the plan + supports
4th: state rality
5th: state situation that lead to conclusion
6th: conclusion: suggesting more plausible plan to achieve goal

the answer would be in form of

the first evaluate the plan; the second suggest more plausible plan to achive goal

hence choice C is obviously correct
2 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
B
Joined: 03 Feb 2013
Posts: 904
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
Re: Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 May 2015, 10:57
2
Got this question in Question Pack 1

Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.

In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?

(A)The first assesses the goal held by certain environmental organization;the second presents the logical goal that the reasoning concludes should be adopted instead
(B)The first assesses the goal held by certain environmental organization:the second presents the strategy that the reasoning concludes has the best chance of reaching that goal.

For both A) and B) , these are not goals, these are strategies which as per author is not going to succeed.

(C)The first is the conclusion reached about one strategy for attaining a certain goal ; the second presents the strategy that the reasoning advocates -> Correct

(D)The first is the main conclusion toward which the reasoning is directed;The second presents a strategy that is called sensible but for which no support is offered.
Support is offered and the author says why more sensible strategy is required.

(E)The first is the main conclusion toward which the reasoning is directed;The second is a consideration raised in order to support that conclusion
2nd is not consideration to support that conclusion. 2nd is another strategy which is presented.
_________________

Thanks,
Kinjal
My Debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267.html#p1449379
My Application Experience : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267-40.html#p1516961
Linkedin : https://www.linkedin.com/in/kinjal-das/

Please click on Kudos, if you think the post is helpful

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 28 Sep 2013
Posts: 87
GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V39
Re: Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2016, 21:37
Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.

In the reasoning above, the two boldface portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first assesses the goal held by certain environmental organizations; the second presents the goal that the reasoning concludes should be adopted instead.
B. The first assesses the goal held by certain environmental organizations; the second presents the strategy that the reasoning concludes has the best chance of reaching that goal.
C. The first is the conclusion reached about one strategy for attaining a certain goal; the second presents the strategy that the reasoning advocates.
D. The first is the main conclusion toward which the reasoning is directed; the second presents a strategy that is called sensible but for which no support is offered.
E. The first is the main conclusion toward which the reasoning is directed; the second is a consideration raised in order to support that conclusion.

Source: Question Pack 1
Correct Answer: C

Sir,
The biggest difficulty that I faced in this question is to find the main conclusion.
I am able to eliminate Option A and Option B because Bold Face 1 is some sort of conclusion either intermediate or main conclusion. But I am still not sure to identify the main conclsuion. Is there any method to do so when such dilemma arises that what is the main conclusion in the argument.
_________________

Richa Champion | My GMAT Journey - 470 720 740

Target 760+

Not Improving after Multiple attempts. I can guide You.
Contact me richacrunch2@gmail.com

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4667
Re: Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jun 2016, 16:01
1
1
1
crunchboss wrote:
Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.

In the reasoning above, the two boldface portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first assesses the goal held by certain environmental organizations; the second presents the goal that the reasoning concludes should be adopted instead.
B. The first assesses the goal held by certain environmental organizations; the second presents the strategy that the reasoning concludes has the best chance of reaching that goal.
C. The first is the conclusion reached about one strategy for attaining a certain goal; the second presents the strategy that the reasoning advocates.
D. The first is the main conclusion toward which the reasoning is directed; the second presents a strategy that is called sensible but for which no support is offered.
E. The first is the main conclusion toward which the reasoning is directed; the second is a consideration raised in order to support that conclusion.

Source: Question Pack 1
Correct Answer: C

Sir,
The biggest difficulty that I faced in this question is to find the main conclusion.
I am able to eliminate Option A and Option B because Bold Face 1 is some sort of conclusion either intermediate or main conclusion. But I am still not sure to identify the main conclsuion. Is there any method to do so when such dilemma arises that what is the main conclusion in the argument.

Dear crunchboss,

I'm happy to reply. :-)

My friend, notice that this prompt also contains an error. The error is the word I highlighted in red above: this word was missing from your post, and the last sentence didn't make sense, so I had to find this argument on another page to identify the missing word. Please be careful when you copy and paste.

My friend, the GMAT CR is difficult precisely because each argument is different. We can't use any formula, because what each argument asks of us is so different.

Notice that the speaker and the environmental groups have the same goal, "to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development." The environmental organizations present one strategy for reaching this goal. The speaker criticizes this strategy, and proposes another strategy that he feels will be more successful for reaching this goal --- but they both agree on the goal. This is why (A) - (B) are wrong: the speaker does not criticize the goal of the environmental organizations because he has the same goal.

I think I would say that this particular CR argument doesn't explicitly reach a conclusion. His main conclusion is not stated, but simply implied. I would phrase his main conclusion as follows: "To reach the goal, Strategy #2 is more effective that Strategy #1" This is implicit in his last sentence. Strategy #1 would be buying the land, the strategy of the environmental organizations---the speaker thinks this strategy is "ill-conceived." Strategy #2 is the one the speaker advocates. Everyone concerned agrees with the goal.

Sometimes a CR argument states a main argument, and sometimes it doesn't.

In this argument, the first BF is not a criticism of the goal, because the speaker agrees with the goal of the environmental organizations. That eliminates (A) & (B). Also, the first BF is not a "main conclusion" by itself: that eliminates (D) & (E). On this basis alone, we can narrow the answers down to (C).

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 30 Dec 2015
Posts: 91
GPA: 3.92
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Re: Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Feb 2017, 06:09
1st & 2nd sentence: Environmental organizations plan to preserve land and how they plan on doin it.
3rd sentence (1st boldface) : Authors conclusion of the above plan & giving reason.
4th & 5th sentence: Author gives POV of farmers ; farmers wont sell if farming is viable.
6th sentence (2nd boldface): An alternate approach is introduced to preserve the land based on sentence 4&5's reasoning.

C it is: The first is the conclusion reached about one strategy for attaining a certain goal ; the second presents the strategy that the reasoning advocates
_________________

If you analyze enough data, you can predict the future.....its calculating probability, nothing more!

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 10 Feb 2017
Posts: 13
CAT Tests
Re: Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 17 Feb 2018, 15:29
Can you please provide an explanation for the question and for the OA.

Originally posted by Bobzi on 17 Feb 2018, 15:22.
Last edited by Bobzi on 17 Feb 2018, 15:29, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 10 Feb 2017
Posts: 13
CAT Tests
Re: Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Feb 2018, 15:25
Here is my BID for the question

'- goal is to preserve land- Plan 1- buy- bad idea instead do Plan 2-help farmers, a better idea.
-BF1- Strategy is bad BF2 Alternative strategy is better and why

I picked C but took me 2.5 minutes
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 24 Mar 2017
Posts: 71
Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 18 Feb 2018, 00:45
Not sure but according to me the answer should be E. please Correct me if I am wrong.
_________________

Sailing through rough waters. Stars & few kudos will steer me past.


Originally posted by arun6765 on 17 Feb 2018, 23:06.
Last edited by arun6765 on 18 Feb 2018, 00:45, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 10 Feb 2017
Posts: 13
CAT Tests
Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Feb 2018, 00:17
arun6765 wrote:
Not sure but according to me the answer should be D. please Correct me if I am wrong.

A. The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.
BF1 happens to be the main point so argument can't reject it as ill-conceived.

B. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.
Same as on the lines of A. Incorrect

C. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.
Second BF1 shows that plan is ill-conceived and alternative course of action.Incorrect

D. The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument¡¯s advocacy of a particular strategy.
Righlty said.

E. The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.
Goal : Plan that buying land will not result in preserving wilderness. BF2 doesn't aim to meet the goal stated in BF1.



Sorry- corrected the answer stems. I didn't realize when I copied a similar question that not only the bolded part was different but also the answer stems were changed to match the bolded sections. I have corrected the mistake now.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 21 Jan 2018
Posts: 57
Location: India
GPA: 2.85
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Apr 2018, 10:49
mun23 wrote:
Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.

In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first assesses the goal held by certain environmental organization; the second presents the logical goal that the reasoning concludes should be adopted instead.

(B) The first assesses the goal held by certain environmental organization; the second presents the strategy that the reasoning concludes has the best chance of reaching that goal.

(C) The first is the conclusion reached about one strategy for attaining a certain goal; the second presents the strategy that the reasoning advocates.

(D) The first is the main conclusion toward which the reasoning is directed; the second presents a strategy that is called sensible but for which no support is offered.

(E) The first is the main conclusion toward which the reasoning is directed; the second is a consideration raised in order to support that conclusion

Similar Question : Different Boldface LINK



Clear C .
The first BF is the conclusion for the first strategy.
The second advocates for alternate strategy.
_________________

Regards ,
Dhruv
_________________
Kudos will encourage many others, like me.

Please Give +1 Kudos if you liked the post!!

Thanks :-D

Re: Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the &nbs [#permalink] 08 Apr 2018, 10:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.