GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 13 Dec 2018, 23:48

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar

European leaders, who met until the early hours of Friday, agreed for

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
G
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2773
European leaders, who met until the early hours of Friday, agreed for  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 10 Sep 2018, 21:14
9
17
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

60% (01:04) correct 40% (01:05) wrong based on 785 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

This question is first practice problem in the meaning based questions and tests proper usage of modifiers. Correct and best explanation will get a Kudos from us and a free subscription for 1 month to our[highlight]OG Verbal 2 solutions for Sentence Correction[/highlight]. OG Verbal 2 solutions contain solutions to all SC questions using e-GMAT 3 step process- amounting to 14 hrs of audio visual content. Currently 60 solutions are uploaded. The set will be completed by the end of the month.


European leaders, who met until the early hours of Friday, agreed for signing, with the head of the World Bank, an intergovernmental treaty that would require it to enforce stricter fiscal and financial discipline in their future budgets.

    A. for signing, with the head of the World Bank, an intergovernmental treaty that would require it
    B. to sign an intergovernmental treaty with the head of the world bank who would require them
    C. to sign an intergovernmental treaty with the head of the world bank, requiring them
    D. to sign, with the head of the world bank, an intergovernmental treaty that would require them
    E. for signing an intergovernmental treaty with the head of the World Bank that would require them

We will provide the official answer in a couple of hrs.

Also Check out 5 strategies that GMAT uses to distort the meaning of the original sentence
5-strategies-that-gmat-uses-to-distort-meaning-124296.html

_________________












| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com


Originally posted by egmat on 09 Dec 2011, 10:54.
Last edited by Bunuel on 10 Sep 2018, 21:14, edited 2 times in total.
Most Helpful Expert Reply
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
G
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2773
Re: European leaders, who met until the early hours of Friday, agreed for  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 24 Jul 2012, 07:24
5
1
Quote:
European leaders, who met until the early hours of Friday, agreed for signing, with the head of the World Bank, an intergovernmental treaty that would require it to enforce stricter fiscal and financial discipline in their future budgets.
A. for signing, with the head of the World Bank, an intergovernmental treaty that would require it
B. to sign an intergovernmental treaty with the head of the world bank who would require them
C. to sign an intergovernmental treaty with the head of the world bank, requiring them
D. to sign, with the head of the world bank, an intergovernmental treaty that would require them
E. for signing an intergovernmental treaty with the head of the World Bank that would require them

Here is the official explanation for this question:
Image

Understand the Meaning of the Original Sentence


The sentence states the following:
• European leaders met until Friday morning
• They agreed to sign a treaty – an intergovernmental treaty.
• They agreed to sign this treaty with the head of the World Bank.
• This treaty would require the leaders to enforce stricter fiscal and financial discipline in their future budgets.

Find the Errors in the Original Sentence


• European leaders,
o who met until the early hours of Friday,
agreed for signing, with the head of the World Bank, an intergovernmental treaty
that would require it
to enforce stricter fiscal and financial discipline in their future budgets.

The sentence has been simplified into its clauses as shown above. All subject verb pairs are accounted for. The pronoun “it” in underlined portion of the sentence logically refers to “European leaders” but does not agree in number with its antecedent. Thus, this sentence has pronoun-antecedent number agreement error. Notice that the other pronoun “their” in non-underlined portion also logically refers to “European leaders”. Context of the sentence requires both these pronouns to refer to the “leaders”. Furthermore, the expression “for signing” is not appropriate. The sentence expresses an intention here – leaders agreed to do something. Thus, the more appropriate expression is “to sign”.

Review Answer choices to do POE


Choice B – Even though this choice is grammatically correct, it is not the correct answer since it distorts the meaning of the original sentence. The sentence per choice B implies that the head of the World Bank would require the leaders to enforce stricter rules. Even though this is logical, it is not what the original sentence states. Per the original sentence, it is the treaty that will enforce these regulations.

Choice C – This choice is grammatically correct but it no longer communicates the logical intended meaning of the sentence. By changing the “that modifier” into a “verb-ing modifier”, this sentence now implies that merely by agreeing to sign this treaty would result in enforcement of stricter controls and regulations. This is clearly not the logical sense.

Choice D – Correct choice.

Choice E – This choice repeats the “for signing” error as in choice A. Furthermore, the structure of this choice is such that now it is no longer clear what would require the leaders to enforce stricter controls. – the World Bank or the treaty. Notice carefully the change in placement of the modifiers in this choice.

TAKE AWAYS



1. Understand the intended meaning of the sentence well before you review the answer choices. If you do not do so, you may mark the seemingly correct choice as the correct answer when this choice in fact changes the meaning of the sentence.
2. Notice carefully any change in the modifier structure itself. The changed modifier may change the meaning of the sentence while still being grammatically correct and/or logically sound.
3. Use “to verb” to present intention.

Note: The attachment at http://gmatclub.com/forum/5-strategies-that-gmat-uses-to-distort-meaning-124296.html contains the document with Strategies for Meaning Change and the questions with detailed solutions. Note that this is a "living" document. We add the strategies, questions, and explanations in this document as we add them on the forum. So be sure to download the latest version!
_________________












| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com


Originally posted by egmat on 12 Dec 2011, 08:51.
Last edited by egmat on 24 Jul 2012, 07:24, edited 1 time in total.
General Discussion
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 12 Sep 2010
Posts: 29
Schools: LBS, INSEAD
Re: European leaders, who met until the early hours of Friday, agreed for  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Dec 2011, 14:24
European leaders, who met until the early hours of Friday, agreed for signing, with the head of the World Bank, an intergovernmental treaty that would require it to enforce stricter fiscal and financial discipline in their future budgets.
----

Here is my explanation...
1. Agreed for signing is WRONG , it should be agreed to sign

After this correction , our sentence looks like this...

European leaders, who met until the early hours of Friday, agreed to sign.

we can ask our self here , question like .. Agreed to sign what or Agreed to sign with whom..

this is answer in the next part... " with the head of the World Bank " ... i think this is kind of adverbial phrase...

moving on in sentence .... 'that would require it' .... Here 'it' is "WRONG". 'it' is referring to Leaders , so it should be 'them'...

All these errors are properly rectified in choice 'D'
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 197
Re: European leaders, who met until the early hours of Friday, agreed for  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Dec 2011, 20:00
IMO C should be the answer. Here is my reasoning:

"Agreed for" is unidiomatic. "Agreed to" is the proper idiom. That leaves us with options B, C & D. (A & E are out).
B - "who" is typically used for people. In option B, it applies to bank. Even though we mention the head of the world bank (who would be an individual), the "who" directly modifies only the "bank", not the "head of the world bank". That is why B is wrong.

D - The prepositional phrase set off by commas is not optional. If we put it in commas as done in option D, then it becomes optional. For example, the "who met until...Friday" part has been put off in commas. In this case, we do not necessarily require this piece of information to make logical sense of the sentence. The sentence would still stand despite the removal of the aforementioned phrase. However, the "with the head of the world bank" phrase is not optional. This part is very much required in the sentence. Who did the leaders sign the treaty with? This is the question that is answered by the phrase above. Hence, it cannot be put off by commas as done in option D.

In C, the leaders agreed to sign a treaty with the head of the world bank. This treaty required the leaders to enforce stricter fiscal and financial discipline in their future budgets. Hence, "requiring them" is appropriate because the "requiring" modifies treaty and "them" refers to "leaders".
This is how I understood and solved the problem. I may, however, be mistaken. Please post the OA with explanation. TIA.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 357
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, General Management
GPA: 3.86
WE: Accounting (Commercial Banking)
Re: European leaders, who met until the early hours of Friday, agreed for  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Dec 2011, 21:42
I am with D

A and E are out as agreed for is unidiomatic

B---->who refers to bank which is awkward

C------>we don't know what "requiring" them is referring to

D---->correct

Plz correct me if i am wrong and also please share the OA with justification

Thanks in advance
_________________

+1 Kudos If found helpful..

Retired Moderator
avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 613
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: European leaders, who met until the early hours of Friday, agreed for  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Dec 2011, 09:29
Thanks e-gmat. Very nice explanation. I think this is the most basic way to approach SC :D
_________________

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Dec 2012
Posts: 33
Concentration: Finance, Operations
GPA: 2.9
Reviews Badge
Re: European leaders, who met until the early hours of Friday, agreed for  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Dec 2012, 03:39
@e gmat :
D. to sign,[u] with the head of the world bank[/u], an intergovernmental treaty that would require them
as the modifier is in between two comma ,so it may modify either sign or an intergovernmental treaty => creating some ambiguity .(few of ur articles have addressed the this things)
so please clarify this point to me ....
Director
Director
avatar
G
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Posts: 681
Premium Member
Re: European leaders, who met until the early hours of Friday, agreed for  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Apr 2017, 22:41
egmat wrote:
Quote:
European leaders, who met until the early hours of Friday, agreed for signing, with the head of the World Bank, an intergovernmental treaty that would require it to enforce stricter fiscal and financial discipline in their future budgets.
A. for signing, with the head of the World Bank, an intergovernmental treaty that would require it
B. to sign an intergovernmental treaty with the head of the world bank who would require them
C. to sign an intergovernmental treaty with the head of the world bank, requiring them
D. to sign, with the head of the world bank, an intergovernmental treaty that would require them
E. for signing an intergovernmental treaty with the head of the World Bank that would require them

Here is the official explanation for this question:
Image

Understand the Meaning of the Original Sentence


The sentence states the following:
• European leaders met until Friday morning
• They agreed to sign a treaty – an intergovernmental treaty.
• They agreed to sign this treaty with the head of the World Bank.
• This treaty would require the leaders to enforce stricter fiscal and financial discipline in their future budgets.

Find the Errors in the Original Sentence


• European leaders,
o who met until the early hours of Friday,
agreed for signing, with the head of the World Bank, an intergovernmental treaty
that would require it
to enforce stricter fiscal and financial discipline in their future budgets.

The sentence has been simplified into its clauses as shown above. All subject verb pairs are accounted for. The pronoun “it” in underlined portion of the sentence logically refers to “European leaders” but does not agree in number with its antecedent. Thus, this sentence has pronoun-antecedent number agreement error. Notice that the other pronoun “their” in non-underlined portion also logically refers to “European leaders”. Context of the sentence requires both these pronouns to refer to the “leaders”. Furthermore, the expression “for signing” is not appropriate. The sentence expresses an intention here – leaders agreed to do something. Thus, the more appropriate expression is “to sign”.

Review Answer choices to do POE


Choice B – Even though this choice is grammatically correct, it is not the correct answer since it distorts the meaning of the original sentence. The sentence per choice B implies that the head of the World Bank would require the leaders to enforce stricter rules. Even though this is logical, it is not what the original sentence states. Per the original sentence, it is the treaty that will enforce these regulations.

Choice C – This choice is grammatically correct but it no longer communicates the logical intended meaning of the sentence. By changing the “that modifier” into a “verb-ing modifier”, this sentence now implies that merely by agreeing to sign this treaty would result in enforcement of stricter controls and regulations. This is clearly not the logical sense.

Choice D – Correct choice.

Choice E – This choice repeats the “for signing” error as in choice A. Furthermore, the structure of this choice is such that now it is no longer clear what would require the leaders to enforce stricter controls. – the World Bank or the treaty. Notice carefully the change in placement of the modifiers in this choice.

TAKE AWAYS



1. Understand the intended meaning of the sentence well before you review the answer choices. If you do not do so, you may mark the seemingly correct choice as the correct answer when this choice in fact changes the meaning of the sentence.
2. Notice carefully any change in the modifier structure itself. The changed modifier may change the meaning of the sentence while still being grammatically correct and/or logically sound.
3. Use “to verb” to present intention.

Note: The attachment at http://gmatclub.com/forum/5-strategies-that-gmat-uses-to-distort-meaning-124296.html contains the document with Strategies for Meaning Change and the questions with detailed solutions. Note that this is a "living" document. We add the strategies, questions, and explanations in this document as we add them on the forum. So be sure to download the latest version!



Can 'it' refer to the World bank?
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 19 Aug 2015
Posts: 91
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
Re: European leaders, who met until the early hours of Friday, agreed for  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 May 2017, 19:41
European leaders, who met until the early hours of Friday, agreed for signing, with the head of the World Bank, an intergovernmental treaty that would require it to enforce stricter fiscal and financial discipline in their future budgets.

    A. for signing, with the head of the World Bank, an intergovernmental treaty that would require it
    B. to sign an intergovernmental treaty with the head of the world bank who would require them using who changes meaning, its not head of WB but treaty enforces....
    C. to sign an intergovernmental treaty with the head of the world bank, requiring them using present participle changes meaning
    D. to sign, with the head of the world bank, an intergovernmental treaty that would require them correct
    E. for signing an intergovernmental treaty with the head of the World Bank that would require them
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 23 Jun 2012
Posts: 384
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GPA: 3.76
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: European leaders, who met until the early hours of Friday, agreed for  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Sep 2018, 05:14
daagh chetan2u egmat

In the right choice , D, i didn't get the placement of modifier " with the head of the world bank"
it seems to be a prepositional modifier modifying leaders who signed treaty with the head but is the placement of this modifier right?
_________________

Push yourself again and again. Don't give an inch until the final buzzer sounds. -Larry Bird
Success isn't something that just happens - success is learned, success is practiced and then it is shared. -Sparky Anderson
-S

Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4555
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: European leaders, who met until the early hours of Friday, agreed for  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Sep 2018, 05:57
Top Contributor
Sananoor
There is some flexibility in placing a prepositional adverbial modifier as long as it modifies the previous clause, essentially the previous clause's subject and its action and not simply the subject alone as you seem to look at it.

Do u think the given version is a misplaced modifier and if so, could you pl give your improved version?
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 23 Jun 2012
Posts: 384
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GPA: 3.76
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: European leaders, who met until the early hours of Friday, agreed for  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Sep 2018, 06:01
daagh wrote:
Sananoor
There is some flexibility in placing a prepositional adverbial modifier as long as it modifies the previous clause, essentially the previous clause's subject and its action and not simply the subject alone as you seem to look at it.

Do u think the given version is a misplaced modifier and if so, could you pl give your improved version?


Thanku daagh for ur prompt reply. ur explanation helps, as always.

Now about improved version, what if we remove the commas and make this prepositional adverbial modifier an essential modifier. will it be right?
_________________

Push yourself again and again. Don't give an inch until the final buzzer sounds. -Larry Bird
Success isn't something that just happens - success is learned, success is practiced and then it is shared. -Sparky Anderson
-S

Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4555
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: European leaders, who met until the early hours of Friday, agreed for  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Sep 2018, 06:42
Top Contributor
The problem is the word 'intergovernmental'. You see that the World Bank is no government and therefore it cannot be part of an intergovernmental treaty WB can only guide the formation of such a treaty.
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

GMAT Club Bot
Re: European leaders, who met until the early hours of Friday, agreed for &nbs [#permalink] 27 Sep 2018, 06:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by

European leaders, who met until the early hours of Friday, agreed for

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron
Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.