Hello Everyone!
This is a great example of a question that has the entire sentence underlined. These can seem tricky, but if we apply the same method we use for other types of questions, we can still narrow down our options quickly and get to the correct choice! To begin, here is the original question with all the major differences between the options highlighted in
orange:
Even though Clovis points, spear points with longitudinal grooves chipped onto their faces, have been found all over North America, they are named for the New Mexico site where they were first discovered in 1932.(A) Even though Clovis points,
spear points with longitudinal grooves chipped onto their faces,
have been found all over North America, they are named for the New Mexico site where they
were first discovered in 1932.
(B) Although named for the New Mexico site where first
discovered in 1932, Clovis points are
spear points of longitudinal grooves chipped onto their faces and
have been found all over North America.
(C) Named for the New Mexico site where they
have been first discovered in 1932, Clovis points,
spear points of longitudinal grooves chipped onto the faces,
have been found all over North America.
(D)
Spear points with longitudinal grooves that are chipped onto the faces, Clovis points, even though named for the New Mexico site where first
discovered in 1932, but
were found all over North America.
(E) While Clovis points are
spear points whose faces have longitudinal grooves chipped into them, they
have been found all over North America, and named for the New Mexico site where they
have been first discovered in 1932.
While there are many more things we could focus on, here are just a few simple ones that jump out:
1. ...spear points with/of/whose faces have longitudinal grooves (Idioms)
2. have been found / were found (Verb Tense)
3. were discovered / discovered / have been discovered (Verb Tense/Meaning)Whenever we see an entire sentence underlined, we can also focus our attention to "big ticket" grammar problems, such as modifiers, parallelism, and intended meaning. However, we're going to start with the basic differences we found while scanning over the options quickly.
Let's start with #1 on our list: with/of/whose faces have. When describing something, we have some idiom rules we need to follow:
noun + WITH + detail -->
CORRECT(The boy with the red hat... / Flowers with purple leaves... / Songs with banjos...)noun + OF + detail -->
WRONG(The word "of" used in this way becomes a possessive, like when we say "The students of the theatre." This means the students belong to the theatre, which is not what we're trying to do here.)So, let's see how each of our options breaks down:
(A) Even though Clovis points,
spear points with longitudinal grooves chipped onto their faces, have been found all over North America, they are named for the New Mexico site where they were first discovered in 1932.
(B) Although named for the New Mexico site where first discovered in 1932, Clovis points are
spear points of longitudinal grooves chipped onto their faces and have been found all over North America.
(C) Named for the New Mexico site where they have been first discovered in 1932, Clovis points,
spear points of longitudinal grooves chipped onto the faces, have been found all over North America.
(D)
Spear points with longitudinal grooves that are chipped onto the faces, Clovis points, even though named for the New Mexico site where first discovered in 1932, but were found all over North America.
(E) While Clovis points are
spear points whose faces have longitudinal grooves chipped into them, they have been found all over North America, and named for the New Mexico site where they have been first discovered in 1932.
We can eliminate options B & C because they say "spears of," which changes the meaning to "the spears belong to longitudinal grooves," which doesn't make any sense.
Let's move on to #2 on our list: have been found vs. were found. While they are both grammatically correct to use in this sentence, they do mean two completely different things:
have been found = Clovis points were found all over North America in the past, and they're still found there today
were found = Clovis points were found all over North America in the past, but no one has found any today
It makes more sense to say that Clovis points were found all over North America and still are today, so let's stick with the options that reflect that:
(A) Even though Clovis points, spear points with longitudinal grooves chipped onto their faces,
have been found all over North America, they are named for the New Mexico site where they were first discovered in 1932.
(D) Spear points with longitudinal grooves that are chipped onto the faces, Clovis points, even though named for the New Mexico site where first discovered in 1932, but
were found all over North America.
(E) While Clovis points are spear points whose faces have longitudinal grooves chipped into them, they
have been found all over North America, and named for the New Mexico site where they have been first discovered in 1932.
We can eliminate option D because it uses the incorrect "were found," which changes the intended meaning.
Now that we've got it narrowed down to only 2 options, let's focus on some of those "big ticket" issues we discussed earlier. Check to make sure modifiers are in the right places, everything is parallel, and the meaning isn't distorted or illogical:
(A) Even though Clovis points, spear points with longitudinal grooves chipped onto their faces, have been found all over North America, they are named for the New Mexico site where they were first discovered in 1932.
This is
CORRECT! The phrase "even though" sets up a contrast between the fact that Clovis points are named after where they were discovered, but they're actually found all over North America. It also uses the right verb tenses, idiom structures, and a clear, logical meaning.
(E)
While Clovis points are spear points whose faces have longitudinal grooves chipped into them, they have been found all over North America, and named for the New Mexico site where they have been first discovered in 1932.
This is
INCORRECT. By starting the sentence with a clause beginning with the word "while," we expect the phrase after it to be the other side of the contrast. If you read the red part by itself, it doesn't really work, does it? What does finding them in North America have to do with the grooves in them? Nothing. The contrast should be between the fact that they can be found all over North America, but they were named for a specific site in New Mexico.
There you have it - option A is the correct choice!Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
_________________