Even though Clovis points, spear points with longitudinal grooves chipped onto their faces, have been found all over North America, they are named for the New Mexico site where they were first discovered in 1932.

This question checks Nouns modifier and intended meaning. There is a property of something, but comparison is done with something else.

(A) Even though Clovis points, spear points with longitudinal grooves chipped onto their faces, have been found all over North America, they are named for the New Mexico site where they were first discovered in 1932.-> Okay. Clovis Points spear points..., 2nd one "Clovis Points have been found...", 3rd one "Clovis Points have been found...", and 4th one "Clovis Points are named for the...". Where talks about New Mexico Site, which makes sense. So far, so good. Let's keep it.

(B) Although named for the New Mexico site where first discovered in 1932, Clovis points are spear points of longitudinal grooves chipped onto their faces and have been found all over North America. -> Intended meaning is asking for comparison of "found all over North America" with "named for the New Mexico site". IN this option, we are comparing "named for the New Mexico site" with "spear points of longitudinal grooves chipped". It is not correct.

(C) Named for the New Mexico site where they have been first discovered in 1932, Clovis points, spear points of longitudinal grooves chipped onto the faces, have been found all over North America. ->Just! do look at verb tense error "have been first discovered in 1932". Easy pick!

(D) Spear points with longitudinal grooves that are chipped onto the faces, Clovis points, even though named for the New Mexico site where first discovered in 1932, but were found all over North America.-> Spear points "but were found all over North America". It doesn't make sense. It should be Clovis points.

(E) While Clovis points are spear points whose faces have longitudinal grooves chipped into them, they have been found all over North America, and named for the New Mexico site where they have been first discovered in 1932.->Just! do look at verb tense error "have been first discovered in 1932". Easy pick!

So, I think A.

Even though Clovis points, spear points with longitudinal grooves chipped onto their faces, have been found all over North America, they are named for the New Mexico site where they were first discovered in 1932.


(A) Even though Clovis points, spear points with longitudinal grooves chipped onto their faces, have been found all over North America, they are named for the New Mexico site where they were first discovered in 1932. Correct

(B) Although named for the New Mexico site where first discovered in 1932, Clovis points are spear points of longitudinal grooves chipped onto their faces and have been found all over North America.

-“where first discovered” is wrong and particularly devoid of any meaning
-“and” in “and have been found” is wrong…there’s no need for a conjunction there

(C) Named for the New Mexico site where they have been first discovered in 1932, Clovis points, spear points of longitudinal grooves chipped onto the faces, have been found all over North America. X

-“have been first discovered” is wrong…there’s no need to mix the present perfect with the past tense…the past tense ‘where they were first discovered’ is sufficient

(D) Spear points with longitudinal grooves that are chipped onto the faces, Clovis points, even though named for the New Mexico site where first discovered in 1932, but were found all over North America. X

-‘where first discovered’ is wrong
-‘but’ is an unnecessary conjunction

(E) While Clovis points are spear points whose faces have longitudinal grooves chipped into them, they have been found all over North America, and named for the New Mexico site where they have been first discovered in 1932. X

-‘and named for the…’ is wrong …again you don’t need that conjunction
-‘where they have been first discovered’ is wrong
_________________

daagh AjiteshArun EMPOWERgmatVerbal egmat

While I understood the main flaw with this option, the highlighted part of above sentence caught my attention.

Isnt this part missing a pronoun ? Is this kind of usage correct ?

'named for the New Mexico site where they were first discovered in 1932'

SD0715

You're right; we don't want to say "where first discovered." I can use a similar construction as an adverbial modifier, but it doesn't make sense here, and I don't think any version with "where" would work. But I could say something like "When first discovered, the drug appeared promising."
_________________

Great question, SD0715!

While it's not grammatically wrong to say "named for the New Mexico site where first discovered," it's not the way most of us write or speak anymore. It's a bit "old fashioned" to leave out pronouns like that. So yes, if you were writing something like this for your own work, you could absolutely add in the words "they were" to make it clearer (and a bit more modern) for your readers.

We hope that helps! Keep tagging us at EMPOWERgmatVerbal with any more questions you run into!
_________________

I know C) is wrong because it uses the past perfect "have been first discovered in 1932" for an action that has no effect/continuity in the present as indicated by "in 1932".

Supposing that "discovered in 1932" was used in C), can I say that C) is wrong because the 2 independent clauses of the sentence are linked with a comma and no conjunction ?

Thanks

Hello Naptiste,

We hope this finds you well.

Having gone through the question and your query, we believe that we can help resolve your doubt.

Option C does not join two independent clauses with a comma (also known as the error of comma splice), as it does not feature two independent clauses. The only independent clause found in Option C is "Clovis points...have been found all over North America."; "Named for the New Mexico site where they have been first discovered in 1932" and "spear points of longitudinal grooves chipped onto the faces" are both modifying phrases that act upon "Clovis points".

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
_________________

Thank you for your answer.

Why are "named for the New Mexico site where they have been first discovered in 1932" and "spear points of longitudinal grooves chipped onto the faces" both not independent clauses?

Is it because they do not make sense on their own?

Thanks

Hello Naptiste,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your question, yes; these two are not independent clauses because they cannot stand on their own as complete sentences. More elaborately, the first lacks a subject and an active verb, and the second lacks an active verb.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
_________________