GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 16 Oct 2019, 15:02

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long ti

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Status: Making every effort to create original content for you!!
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 465
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long ti  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Mar 2013, 21:26
1
4
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

73% (01:35) correct 27% (01:54) wrong based on 498 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long time on the misuse of fossil fuels, most scientists now agree that human activity is causing a rapid depletion of these resources. Though predictions vary, many fossil fuel experts believe that all the Earth’s fossil fuels will be consumed by the next century. Such an event would cause a global shut down of all the industries and equipments that use fossil fuels, disturbing habitat and resources for survival for billions of people.

Which of the following is an assumption in support of the argument’s conclusion?

A) New technological developments in the next century will not create a substitute for fossil fuels.
B) Individuals will not become more aware of the steps they can take to reduce the use of fossil fuels.
C) Global shutdown of industries and equipments that use fossil fuels will similarly affect all parts of the Earth.
D) Some fossil fuel experts predict that the fossil fuels will be completely depleted even earlier than during the next century.
E) Human activity is the sole cause of depleting fossil fuels.

_________________
Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 112
Re: Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long ti  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Mar 2013, 21:52
2
my take A
the argument is based on complete exhaustion of fossil fuel so if A is negated then conclusion will fall apart
B cannot be for even if people become aware then what is a guarantee that exhaustion of fossil fuel will stop !!
Manager
Joined: 26 Jul 2011
Posts: 77
Location: India
WE: Marketing (Manufacturing)
Re: Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long ti  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Mar 2013, 23:58
1
Premise Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long time on the misuse of fossil fuels, most scientists now agree that human activity is causing a rapid depletion of these resources.

Premise Though predictions vary, many fossil fuel experts believe that all the Earth’s fossil fuels will be consumed by the next century.

Conclusion Such an event would cause a global shut down of all the industries and equipments that use fossil fuels, disturbing habitat and resources for survival for billions of people.

Which of the following is an assumption in support of the argument’s conclusion?

A) New technological developments in the next century will not create a substitute for fossil fuels
This argument defends the argument as an assumption....If we don't assume this we cannot derive a conclusion that " Such an event would cause a global shut down of all the industries and equipments that use fossil fuels, disturbing habitat and resources for survival for billions of people"
B) Individuals will not become more aware of the steps they can take to reduce the use of fossil fuels.
[color=#ed1c24]Doesn't affect the conclusion in any way[/color]
C) Global shutdown of industries and equipments that use fossil fuels will similarly affect all parts of the Earth.
Doesn't matter after we have reached the conclusion that there will global shutdown
D) Some fossil fuel experts predict that the fossil fuels will be completely depleted even earlier than during the next century.
Doesn't matter after we have reached the conclusion that there will global shutdown
E) Human activity is the sole cause of depleting fossil fuels.
explicitly stated so this cannot be an assumption
Director
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 626
Location: India
Re: Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long ti  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Mar 2013, 03:04
Vercules wrote:
Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long time on the misuse of fossil fuels, most scientists now agree that human activity is causing a rapid depletion of these resources. Though predictions vary, many fossil fuel experts believe that all the Earth’s fossil fuels will be consumed by the next century. Such an event would cause a global shut down of all the industries and equipments that use fossil fuels, disturbing habitat and resources for survival for billions of people.

Which of the following is an assumption in support of the argument’s conclusion?

A) New technological developments in the next century will not create a substitute for fossil fuels.
B) Individuals will not become more aware of the steps they can take to reduce the use of fossil fuels.
C) Global shutdown of industries and equipments that use fossil fuels will similarly affect all parts of the Earth.
D) Some fossil fuel experts predict that the fossil fuels will be completely depleted even earlier than during the next century.
E) Human activity is the sole cause of depleting fossil fuels.

OA and OE after discussions

Premise:human activity is causing a rapid depletion of fossil fuels and all the Earth’s fossil fuels will be consumed by the next century
Conclusion: Such an event would cause a global shut down of all the industries and equipments that use fossil fuels, disturbing habitat and resources for survival for billions of people.

We need to look for the choice whose negation (i) is an additional premise which negates the conclusion or (ii) which reduces the force of the premise.

The negation of choice A which is "New technological developments in the next century will create a substitute for fossil fuels.", is an additional premise which negates the conclusion.

None of the other choices does that. So choice A.
_________________
Srinivasan Vaidyaraman
Sravna Test Prep
http://www.sravnatestprep.com

Holistic and Systematic Approach
Intern
Joined: 19 Aug 2012
Posts: 47
Re: Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long ti  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Mar 2013, 09:02
1

A) New technological developments in the next century will not create a substitute for fossil fuels. this is the correct assumption because if new substitutes are not created then, finally the fossil fuels will any how get over.
B) Individuals will not become more aware of the steps they can take to REDUCED the use of fossil fuels. Incorrect. Even if the fossil fuel consumption is reduced, the consumption will continue and will lead to its end. Best trap answer. note the word REDUCED.
C) Global shutdown of industries and equipments that use fossil fuels will similarly affect all parts of the Earth. Not relevent
D) Some fossil fuel experts predict that the fossil fuels will be completely depleted even earlier than during the next century. Not relevent
E) Human activity is the sole cause of depleting fossil fuels. directly stated from the premise. not an assumption.
_________________
giving kudos is the best thing you can do for me..
Director
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 840
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Re: Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long ti  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Mar 2013, 11:13
anish123ster wrote:

A) New technological developments in the next century will not create a substitute for fossil fuels. this is the correct assumption because if new substitutes are not created then, finally the fossil fuels will any how get over.
B) Individuals will not become more aware of the steps they can take to REDUCED the use of fossil fuels. Incorrect. Even if the fossil fuel consumption is reduced, the consumption will continue and will lead to its end. Best trap answer. note the word REDUCED.
C) Global shutdown of industries and equipments that use fossil fuels will similarly affect all parts of the Earth. Not relevent
D) Some fossil fuel experts predict that the fossil fuels will be completely depleted even earlier than during the next century. Not relevent
E) Human activity is the sole cause of depleting fossil fuels. directly stated from the premise. not an assumption.

Tons of kudos to you man....gr8 differentiation pointed out .....surely thats the hinge.....

Archit
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 303
Location: European union
Re: Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long ti  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Mar 2013, 19:35
Chose A without even reading the other options. 34 seconds in total ))
Senior Manager
Status: Making every effort to create original content for you!!
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 465
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
Re: Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long ti  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Mar 2013, 15:36
Vercules wrote:
Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long time on the misuse of fossil fuels, most scientists now agree that human activity is causing a rapid depletion of these resources. Though predictions vary, many fossil fuel experts believe that all the Earth’s fossil fuels will be consumed by the next century. Such an event would cause a global shut down of all the industries and equipments that use fossil fuels, disturbing habitat and resources for survival for billions of people.

Which of the following is an assumption in support of the argument’s conclusion?

A) New technological developments in the next century will not create a substitute for fossil fuels.
B) Individuals will not become more aware of the steps they can take to reduce the use of fossil fuels.
C) Global shutdown of industries and equipment that use fossil fuels will similarly affect all parts of the Earth.
D) Some fossil fuel experts predict that the fossil fuels will be completely depleted even earlier than during the next century.
E) Human activity is the sole cause of depleting fossil fuels.

Hi Guys,

Updating the post with OA and OE.

The argument concludes that depletion of fossil fuels caused by human activity will shut down of all the industries and equipments that use fossil fuels, disturbing habitat and resources for survival for billions. Any assumption in support of this conclusion would have to corroborate that these events will definitively take place..

(A) New technological developments in the next century will not create a substitute for fossil fuels.

Correct. If new technological developments in the next century allow people to come up with an alternative for fossil fuels, then industries and equipment that use fossil fuels will not shut down. Thus, a necessary assumption is that these technologies will not be developed.

(B) Individuals will not become more aware of the steps they can take to reduce the use of fossil fuels.

A simple awareness of the steps to reduce the consumption of fossil fuels in no way undermines the argument’s conclusion, as this answer choice does not describe any action being taken by individuals.

(C) Global shutdown of industries and equipments that use fossil fuels will similarly affect all parts of the Earth.

The argument never suggests that all parts of the Earth will be similarly affected; this choice is too extreme and overreaching for the argument’s conclusion.

(D) Some fossil fuel experts predict that the fossil fuels will be completely depleted even earlier than during the next century.

This might be true, but it is not an assumption on which the conclusion rests. Instead, this answer choice is simply an inference that might be drawn from the premises. This a good example of a choice which can be true based on the stimulus but not actually a valid assumption.

(E) Human activity is the sole cause of depleting fossil fuels.

The idea that human activity is the sole cause of fossil fuel depletion is neither suggested nor assumed by the argument. In addition, the wording "sole cause" is too extreme.
_________________
Intern
Joined: 02 Jan 2018
Posts: 3
Re: Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long ti  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Oct 2018, 07:35
Hello,

I have a question regarding the answer choices A and B
I selected B because my reasoning to reject B was as follows:
negate A and we get: New technological developments in the next century will create a substitute for fossil fuels.
My thought process: Even if substitutes were created we dont know if the current industries are equipped to work with the new substitutes for fossil fuels and they can still be closed down and based on this thought process I rejected A.

Although I do agree after reading the comments that B is the best answer. Have I taken my thought process too far when rejecting A?

Regards
Board of Directors
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 4782
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
Re: Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long ti  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Oct 2018, 08:20
Hello,

I have a question regarding the answer choices A and B
I selected B because my reasoning to reject B was as follows:
negate A and we get: New technological developments in the next century will create a substitute for fossil fuels.
My thought process: Even if substitutes were created we dont know if the current industries are equipped to work with the new substitutes for fossil fuels and they can still be closed down and based on this thought process I rejected A.

Although I do agree after reading the comments that B is the best answer. Have I taken my thought process too far when rejecting A?

Regards

The highlighted part in my opinion is far fetched reasoning..
_________________
Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )
Re: Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long ti   [#permalink] 25 Oct 2018, 08:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by