B says it is a necessary condition that the farmers know an animals “evolutionary history.”
The evolutionary history is the reason why the animals conform to certain practices and resist others. All the farmer (according to the passage) would need to do is observe these animals behaviors.
Knowing the animals evolutionary history and WHY it behaves the way it does is not a necessary condition to apply a certain practice that an animal will resist or conform too.
We are not told, but presumably they could view the animals’ responses and test different practices out. Again, we don’t know, but this possibility is left open.
Because animals resist certain practices and we are told that this resisting lead to inefficiency, it can be inferred that a farmer COULD possibly increase efficiency by tailoring the methods to the behavior of the animal. Which is effectively what E says.
Thinking about something in the real world:
You are baby sitting someone else’s baby. You see that when you let him use a toy he stops crying, but when you take that toy away from him he resists and cries.
The reason why he does this is because his parents have spoiled him (maybe?) by letting him play with his toys all the time. In order to get him to stop crying (a more “efficient practice”), it wouldn’t be a necessary condition that you know his whole history of being spoiled and how he evolved to be a brat.
I don’t know if that’s a good analogy, but it’s the best I can come up with based on what the facts in the passage are lol
lakshya14
What's the difference between (B) and (E)? Ended up taking (B)
Posted from my mobile device