GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 21 Oct 2019, 05:36

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2010
Posts: 96
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Fuqua '14 (M)
GMAT ToolKit User
For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 06 Feb 2019, 04:00
12
47
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

57% (02:01) correct 43% (01:54) wrong based on 809 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less than or equal to t. Is //k// evenly divisible by 2?

(1) 5 < k < 6
(2) //k + 2.3// = 7


Source: Knewton

_________________
I appreciate the kudos if you find this post helpful! +1

Originally posted by martie11 on 26 Nov 2010, 15:03.
Last edited by Bunuel on 06 Feb 2019, 04:00, edited 3 times in total.
Edited the question
Most Helpful Expert Reply
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58421
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Feb 2014, 04:28
2
5
martie11 wrote:
For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less than or equal to t. Is //k// evenly divisible by 2?

(1) 5 < k < 6
(2) //k + 2.3// = 7


Source: Knewton

Solution to follow...interested to see how people interrupt this question.


Similar questions to practice:
if-denotes-the-least-integer-greater-than-or-equal-to-x-132223.html
if-denotes-the-greatest-integer-less-than-or-equal-to-x-94687.html
for-all-numbers-t-let-t-be-defined-as-the-greatest-105416.html
is-x-an-odd-integer-1-x-2-2x-99856.html
for-all-z-denotes-the-least-integer-greater-than-or-110561.html
denotes-to-be-the-least-integer-no-less-than-x-is-130841.html
for-all-numbers-t-let-t-be-defined-as-the-greatest-105416.html
if-is-the-greatest-integer-less-than-or-equal-to-x-what-144277.html
how-x-become-fraction-if-its-been-said-an-integer-94687.html
awkward-ds-105416.html
help-data-sufficiency-equation-and-inequalities-99856.html
if-denotes-the-greatest-integer-less-than-or-equal-to-x-94687.html
denotes-to-be-the-least-integer-no-less-than-x-is-130841.html
is-the-greatest-integer-less-than-or-equal-to-the-real-n-154006.html
if-denotes-the-greatest-integer-less-than-or-equal-to-z-162078.html
if-denotes-the-least-integer-greater-than-or-equal-to-x-132223.html
is-the-greatest-integer-less-than-or-equal-to-the-real-n-154006.html

Hope it helps.
_________________
Most Helpful Community Reply
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2010
Posts: 96
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Fuqua '14 (M)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Nov 2010, 15:26
7
2
Thanks for the reply stanford2012.

Looking at statement b...
Slight correction in your inequality: 4.7 ≤ k < 5.7. With this inequality, we see that k can be 4.7, 4.8, 4.9, etc. Hence, if k < 5 then //k// = 4, which is divisible by 2.
However, if k = 5.2, then //k// = 5, which is not divisible by 2.

Hence insufficient.

Correct answer is A. Updated post with OA.
_________________
I appreciate the kudos if you find this post helpful! +1
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: I rest, I rust.
Joined: 04 Oct 2010
Posts: 96
Schools: ISB - Co 2013
WE 1: IT Professional since 2006
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Nov 2010, 20:39
2
martie11 wrote:
Source: Knewton

For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less than or equal to t. Is //k// evenly divisible by 2?

a) 5 < k < 6
b) //k + 2.3// = 7

Solution to follow...interested to see how people interrupt this question.


S1: 5< k < 6 means //k// = 5. Not divisible by 2. Sufficient.
S2: //k+2.3// = 7 means 8 > k+2.3 >= 7. therefore 5.7 > k >=4.7 and //k// = 4 or 5. Not Sufficient.

Answer: A
_________________
Respect,
Vaibhav

PS: Correct me if I am wrong.
General Discussion
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Apr 2010
Posts: 94
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Nov 2010, 15:15
4
Statement A: Tells you that k is somewhere between 5 and 6. Based on the definition of the question stem /k/ is thus 5, which is not evently divisible by 2.

=> Sufficient

Statement B:Tells you that the following inequality has to hold: 7 < k + 2.3 < 8 => 4.7 < k < 5.7 => /k/ has to equal 5, which is not evenly divisible.

=> Sufficient

Hence, solution D is correct.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2010
Posts: 96
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Fuqua '14 (M)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Nov 2010, 23:25
1
krishnasty wrote:
martie11 wrote:
Source: Knewton

For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less than or equal to t. Is //k// evenly divisible by 2?

a) 5 < k < 6
b) //k + 2.3// = 7

Solution to follow...interested to see how people interrupt this question.



Can somebody please explain me what '//' symbol implies over here??

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Consider KUDOS if you like my post!


It's my interpretation that this is equivalent to the "floor" of the number.

In this case, say you have x = 11.3. Now the question tries to confuse you: // x // is equal to the greatest integer less than or equal to x, in other words:

// x // --> the largest integer <= x

In this case x = 11.3, so the largest number that is <= 11.3 is 11. So // x // = 11. Note, if x = 11, then by definition, // x // = 11.

I think the concept itself is fairly straightforward, it's the wording that is awkward....

HTHs.
_________________
I appreciate the kudos if you find this post helpful! +1
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58421
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Nov 2010, 02:15
2
krishnasty wrote:
martie11 wrote:
Source: Knewton

For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less than or equal to t. Is //k// evenly divisible by 2?

a) 5 < k < 6
b) //k + 2.3// = 7

Solution to follow...interested to see how people interrupt this question.



Can somebody please explain me what '//' symbol implies over here??

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Consider KUDOS if you like my post!


Stem defines some function, represented by the symbol \(////\), as the function which rounds down any number to an integer value:

\(//3.4//=3\), \(//2//=2\), \(//-7.5//=-8\), ...

Check similar question for practice: how-x-become-fraction-if-its-been-said-an-integer-94687.html

Hope it helps.
_________________
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Still Struggling
Joined: 03 Nov 2010
Posts: 111
Location: India
GMAT Date: 10-15-2011
GPA: 3.71
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Nov 2010, 08:59
hmmmmmm........... :idea:

much clear now....thanks!!
_________________
Appreciation in KUDOS please!
Knewton Free Test 10/03 - 710 (49/37)
Princeton Free Test 10/08 - 610 (44/31)
Kaplan Test 1- 10/10 - 630
Veritas Prep- 10/11 - 630 (42/37)
MGMAT 1 - 10/12 - 680 (45/34)
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 64
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Dec 2010, 11:11
Sat.1- 5<k<6 mean any integer n.m. between 5 to 6. 5 is possible integer value.and 5 isn't evenly divisible by 2. suffucient
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 401
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GPA: 3.23
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Dec 2012, 01:29
1
1
Rule: //t// is the greatest integer less than or equal to t
Problem: Is //k// evenly divisible by 2?

(1) 5 < k < 6
//k// = 5 which is not divisible by 2
SUFFICIENT.
(2) //k + 2.3// = 7
8 > k + 2.3 >= 7
5.7 > k > 4.7
if k = 4, YES
if not, NO
INSUFFICIENT.

Answer: A
_________________
Impossible is nothing to God.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 128
Concentration: Technology, Other
Schools: Berkeley Haas
GMAT Date: 01-14-2015
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Sep 2014, 19:11
Can somebody explain to me why statement B //k + 2.3// = 7 become this 8 > k + 2.3 >= 7 ?

I am confused ... :?
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58421
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Sep 2014, 04:51
shelrod007 wrote:
Can somebody explain to me why statement B //k + 2.3// = 7 become this 8 > k + 2.3 >= 7 ?

I am confused ... :?


The function rounds down any number to an integer value:

\(//3.4//=3\), \(//2//=2\), \(//-7.5//=-8\), ...

So, //x// = 7, means that 7 <= x < 8. Any number from this range when rounded down gives 7.

Check other Rounding Functions Questions in our Special Questions Directory.
_________________
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 17 Jun 2015
Posts: 195
GMAT 1: 540 Q39 V26
GMAT 2: 680 Q46 V37
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Dec 2015, 06:54
Statement 1 gives k to be 5. Sufficient

Statement 2, on solving, gives two answers 3 and 4. Insufficient

Hence A
_________________
Fais de ta vie un rêve et d'un rêve une réalité
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 Feb 2016
Posts: 12
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Apr 2016, 04:54
Bunuel wrote:
krishnasty wrote:
martie11 wrote:
Source: Knewton

For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less than or equal to t. Is //k// evenly divisible by 2?

a) 5 < k < 6
b) //k + 2.3// = 7

Solution to follow...interested to see how people interrupt this question.



Can somebody please explain me what '//' symbol implies over here??

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Consider KUDOS if you like my post!


Stem defines some function, represented by the symbol \(////\), as the function which rounds down any number to an integer value:

\(//3.4//=3\), \(//2//=2\), \(//-7.5//=-8\), ...

Check similar question for practice: how-x-become-fraction-if-its-been-said-an-integer-94687.html

Hope it helps.


7 < k + 2.3 < 8
I'm confuse how they got this
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58421
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Apr 2016, 05:02
sabxu1 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:

Stem defines some function, represented by the symbol \(////\), as the function which rounds down any number to an integer value:

\(//3.4//=3\), \(//2//=2\), \(//-7.5//=-8\), ...

Check similar question for practice: how-x-become-fraction-if-its-been-said-an-integer-94687.html

Hope it helps.


7 < k + 2.3 < 8
I'm confuse how they got this


The function rounds down any number to an integer value:

\(//3.4//=3\), \(//2//=2\), \(//-7.5//=-8\), ...

So, //x// = 7, means that 7 <= x < 8. Any number from this range when rounded down gives 7.

Check other Rounding Functions Questions in our Special Questions Directory.
_________________
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Aug 2014
Posts: 9
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, Entrepreneurship
Schools: HBS '18
GPA: 3.9
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 May 2016, 22:50
1
Bunuel , I didn't get why B is not sufficient . Could you please explain.

So, //x// = 7, means that 7 <= x < 8. Any number from this range when rounded down gives 7.

When any number in this range rounds down to 7 , then

//k+2.3//=7

7<=k+2.3<8

4.7<=k<5.7

So K will rounds down either 4 or 5 . Right . That is what you mean ??

That's why B not sufficient ?

Thanks
Regards
Math Expert
avatar
V
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 8005
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 May 2016, 23:08
1
parvgugnani wrote:
Bunuel , I didn't get why B is not sufficient . Could you please explain.

So, //x// = 7, means that 7 <= x < 8. Any number from this range when rounded down gives 7.

When any number in this range rounds down to 7 , then

//k+2.3//=7

7<=k+2.3<8

4.7<=k<5.7

So K will rounds down either 4 or 5 . Right . That is what you mean ??

That's why B not sufficient ?

Thanks
Regards


Yes, you have understood the logic perfectly..
_________________
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 15 Jan 2017
Posts: 340
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Aug 2017, 10:21
I did understand st 1. Pretty clear
But for statement two, how do we know that //k + 2.3 // 7 is basically 8>=7. How do we deduce that there was an 8 as well? It doesn't state anywhere that k is a value between 8 and 7 --> after all, //t// was less than equal to t
Would appreciate some detail on interpreting this, thank you :)
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Jan 2017
Posts: 120
Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Sep 2018, 09:10
This seems to me a very high quality question. Couldn't really get statement B until I read the comments.
Thanks for wonderful explanation Bunuel.

As for statement 1, it always rounds down to 5 and hence not divisible by 2 and hence is sufficient to answer the question.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 12 Mar 2018
Posts: 110
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2018, 13:49
the question is lacking of auxiliary info: how do we know //k values can be operated by decimals...
GMAT Club Bot
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less   [#permalink] 10 Oct 2018, 13:49

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 21 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





cron

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne