Last visit was: 22 Jul 2024, 06:23 It is currently 22 Jul 2024, 06:23
Toolkit
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less

SORT BY:
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Manager
Joined: 26 Apr 2010
Posts: 87
Own Kudos [?]: 377 [111]
Given Kudos: 54
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Fuqua '14 (M)
Manager
Joined: 26 Apr 2010
Posts: 87
Own Kudos [?]: 377 [11]
Given Kudos: 54
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Fuqua '14 (M)
Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2010
Status:I rest, I rust.
Posts: 68
Own Kudos [?]: 212 [10]
Given Kudos: 9
Concentration: IT Major
Schools:ISB - Co 2013
Q48  V34 GMAT 2: 760  Q50  V44
GPA: 2.5-3.0
WE 1: IT Professional since 2006
General Discussion
Manager
Joined: 02 Apr 2010
Posts: 78
Own Kudos [?]: 258 [6]
Given Kudos: 18
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less [#permalink]
6
Kudos
Statement A: Tells you that k is somewhere between 5 and 6. Based on the definition of the question stem /k/ is thus 5, which is not evently divisible by 2.

=> Sufficient

Statement B:Tells you that the following inequality has to hold: 7 < k + 2.3 < 8 => 4.7 < k < 5.7 => /k/ has to equal 5, which is not evenly divisible.

=> Sufficient

Hence, solution D is correct.
Manager
Joined: 26 Apr 2010
Posts: 87
Own Kudos [?]: 377 [1]
Given Kudos: 54
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Fuqua '14 (M)
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less [#permalink]
1
Kudos
krishnasty wrote:
martie11 wrote:
Source: Knewton

For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less than or equal to t. Is //k// evenly divisible by 2?

a) 5 < k < 6
b) //k + 2.3// = 7

Solution to follow...interested to see how people interrupt this question.

Can somebody please explain me what '//' symbol implies over here??

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Consider KUDOS if you like my post!

It's my interpretation that this is equivalent to the "floor" of the number.

In this case, say you have x = 11.3. Now the question tries to confuse you: // x // is equal to the greatest integer less than or equal to x, in other words:

// x // --> the largest integer <= x

In this case x = 11.3, so the largest number that is <= 11.3 is 11. So // x // = 11. Note, if x = 11, then by definition, // x // = 11.

I think the concept itself is fairly straightforward, it's the wording that is awkward....

HTHs.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 94509
Own Kudos [?]: 642966 [2]
Given Kudos: 86717
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less [#permalink]
2
Kudos
krishnasty wrote:
martie11 wrote:
Source: Knewton

For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less than or equal to t. Is //k// evenly divisible by 2?

a) 5 < k < 6
b) //k + 2.3// = 7

Solution to follow...interested to see how people interrupt this question.

Can somebody please explain me what '//' symbol implies over here??

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Consider KUDOS if you like my post!

Stem defines some function, represented by the symbol $$////$$, as the function which rounds down any number to an integer value:

$$//3.4//=3$$, $$//2//=2$$, $$//-7.5//=-8$$, ...

Check similar question for practice: how-x-become-fraction-if-its-been-said-an-integer-94687.html

Hope it helps.
Manager
Joined: 03 Nov 2010
Status:Still Struggling
Posts: 94
Own Kudos [?]: 450 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Location: India
GMAT Date: 10-15-2011
GPA: 3.71
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less [#permalink]
hmmmmmm...........

much clear now....thanks!!
Intern
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 41
Own Kudos [?]: 75 [0]
Given Kudos: 15
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less [#permalink]
Sat.1- 5<k<6 mean any integer n.m. between 5 to 6. 5 is possible integer value.and 5 isn't evenly divisible by 2. suffucient
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 328
Own Kudos [?]: 1843 [2]
Given Kudos: 11
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GPA: 3.23
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Rule: //t// is the greatest integer less than or equal to t
Problem: Is //k// evenly divisible by 2?

(1) 5 < k < 6
//k// = 5 which is not divisible by 2
SUFFICIENT.
(2) //k + 2.3// = 7
8 > k + 2.3 >= 7
5.7 > k > 4.7
if k = 4, YES
if not, NO
INSUFFICIENT.

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 94509
Own Kudos [?]: 642966 [10]
Given Kudos: 86717
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less [#permalink]
2
Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Manager
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 99
Own Kudos [?]: 172 [2]
Given Kudos: 41
Concentration: Technology, Other
Schools: Berkeley Haas
GMAT Date: 01-14-2015
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Can somebody explain to me why statement B //k + 2.3// = 7 become this 8 > k + 2.3 >= 7 ?

I am confused ...
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 94509
Own Kudos [?]: 642966 [5]
Given Kudos: 86717
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less [#permalink]
2
Kudos
3
Bookmarks
shelrod007 wrote:
Can somebody explain to me why statement B //k + 2.3// = 7 become this 8 > k + 2.3 >= 7 ?

I am confused ...

The function rounds down any number to an integer value:

$$//3.4//=3$$, $$//2//=2$$, $$//-7.5//=-8$$, ...

So, //x// = 7, means that 7 <= x < 8. Any number from this range when rounded down gives 7.

Check other Rounding Functions Questions in our Special Questions Directory.
Manager
Joined: 17 Jun 2015
Posts: 166
Own Kudos [?]: 201 [0]
Given Kudos: 176
GMAT 1: 540 Q39 V26
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V31
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less [#permalink]
Statement 1 gives k to be 5. Sufficient

Statement 2, on solving, gives two answers 3 and 4. Insufficient

Hence A
Intern
Joined: 26 Feb 2016
Posts: 11
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 26
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
krishnasty wrote:
martie11 wrote:
Source: Knewton

For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less than or equal to t. Is //k// evenly divisible by 2?

a) 5 < k < 6
b) //k + 2.3// = 7

Solution to follow...interested to see how people interrupt this question.

Can somebody please explain me what '//' symbol implies over here??

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Consider KUDOS if you like my post!

Stem defines some function, represented by the symbol $$////$$, as the function which rounds down any number to an integer value:

$$//3.4//=3$$, $$//2//=2$$, $$//-7.5//=-8$$, ...

Check similar question for practice: how-x-become-fraction-if-its-been-said-an-integer-94687.html

Hope it helps.

7 < k + 2.3 < 8
I'm confuse how they got this
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 94509
Own Kudos [?]: 642966 [1]
Given Kudos: 86717
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
sabxu1 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:

Stem defines some function, represented by the symbol $$////$$, as the function which rounds down any number to an integer value:

$$//3.4//=3$$, $$//2//=2$$, $$//-7.5//=-8$$, ...

Check similar question for practice: how-x-become-fraction-if-its-been-said-an-integer-94687.html

Hope it helps.

7 < k + 2.3 < 8
I'm confuse how they got this

The function rounds down any number to an integer value:

$$//3.4//=3$$, $$//2//=2$$, $$//-7.5//=-8$$, ...

So, //x// = 7, means that 7 <= x < 8. Any number from this range when rounded down gives 7.

Check other Rounding Functions Questions in our Special Questions Directory.
Intern
Joined: 11 Aug 2014
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [1]
Given Kudos: 82
Location: United States
Schools: HBS '18
GPA: 3.9
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Bunuel , I didn't get why B is not sufficient . Could you please explain.

So, //x// = 7, means that 7 <= x < 8. Any number from this range when rounded down gives 7.

When any number in this range rounds down to 7 , then

//k+2.3//=7

7<=k+2.3<8

4.7<=k<5.7

So K will rounds down either 4 or 5 . Right . That is what you mean ??

That's why B not sufficient ?

Thanks
Regards
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Status:Math and DI Expert
Posts: 11478
Own Kudos [?]: 34521 [2]
Given Kudos: 323
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less [#permalink]
2
Kudos
parvgugnani wrote:
Bunuel , I didn't get why B is not sufficient . Could you please explain.

So, //x// = 7, means that 7 <= x < 8. Any number from this range when rounded down gives 7.

When any number in this range rounds down to 7 , then

//k+2.3//=7

7<=k+2.3<8

4.7<=k<5.7

So K will rounds down either 4 or 5 . Right . That is what you mean ??

That's why B not sufficient ?

Thanks
Regards

Yes, you have understood the logic perfectly..
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Jan 2017
Posts: 257
Own Kudos [?]: 87 [0]
Given Kudos: 932
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less [#permalink]
I did understand st 1. Pretty clear
But for statement two, how do we know that //k + 2.3 // 7 is basically 8>=7. How do we deduce that there was an 8 as well? It doesn't state anywhere that k is a value between 8 and 7 --> after all, //t// was less than equal to t
Would appreciate some detail on interpreting this, thank you
Manager
Joined: 14 Jan 2017
Posts: 102
Own Kudos [?]: 130 [0]
Given Kudos: 119
Location: India
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less [#permalink]
This seems to me a very high quality question. Couldn't really get statement B until I read the comments.
Thanks for wonderful explanation Bunuel.

As for statement 1, it always rounds down to 5 and hence not divisible by 2 and hence is sufficient to answer the question.
Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2018
Posts: 82
Own Kudos [?]: 15 [0]
Given Kudos: 91
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less [#permalink]
the question is lacking of auxiliary info: how do we know //k values can be operated by decimals...
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less [#permalink]
1   2
Moderator:
Math Expert
94509 posts