Hi everyone,
All correct in a little less than 10 minutes.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------P1Paragraph one starts with the author opinion about a general trend related to historians. She (the author) says that in general historians focus only on the "tragedies" of black american people and not on their achievements. Then we are given that two authors (B&I) are somehow two outliers who describe the achievements of african american people in the colonial age in some region of the north. They say that, even if Blakeys people were somehow disadvantaged, if black people worked hard enough, they could attain the same results as white people.
Brief summary: B&I study is presented
P2Paragraph 2 states that the B&I show in their study that african american people had mote or less than same opportunities as white people even though the political power was not so well distributed.
Here the author introduces a contrast by stating that B&I might have overlooked some laws that discriminated African American people already before 1670. These laws were made when the percentage of African Americans started growing and it seems that such laws were discriminant. Plus we are given that an African American named Anthony moved to another place and while B&I interpret this as a simple reflection of the will to find new fortunes, the author suggests that Anthony might have acknowledged that for Afrian American people things started getting worse.
Brief summary: African America people according to B&I versus according to the author
Main PointThe main point is to evaluate B&I study
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1. The author of the passage objects to many scholarly studies of African American history for which one of the following reasons?
Pre-thinking
Detail question
Let's refer to the first lines of P1
"For too many years scholars of African American history focused on the harm done by slaveholders and by the institution of slavery, rather than on what Africans in the United States were able to accomplish despite the effects of that institution. "
(A) Their emphases have been on statutory law rather than on customary law.
Not in line with pre-thinking and out of context(B) They have ignored specific historical situations and personages in favor of broad interpretations.
Not in line with pre-thinking(C) They have focused on the least eventful periods in African American history.
Not in line with pre-thinking(D) They have underemphasized the economic system that was the basis of the institution of slavery.
Not in line with pre-thinking(E) They have failed to focus to a sufficient extent on the achievements of African Americans.
in line with pre-thinking-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2. Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage concerning the relationship between the African American population and the law in the Chesapeake Bay region of Virginia between 1650 and 1670?
Pre-thinking
Inference question
Let's refer to P2
" during the 1660s, when the proportion of African Americans in Virginia increased dramatically, Virginia tightened a law regulating interracial relations (1662) and enacted a statute prohibiting baptism from altering slave status (1667)."
We could infer that as the population of AA increased the laws were enacted
(A) The laws affecting black citizens were embodied in statutes much more gradually than were laws affecting white citizens.
We don't know this and cannot infer this(B) As the percentage of black citizens in the population grew, the legal restrictions placed on them also increased.
Seems a reasonable inference(C) Because of discriminatory laws, black farmers suffered more economic setbacks than did white farmers.
The information given does not allow us to draw such a conclusion (D) Because of legal constraints on hiring indentured servants, black farmers faced a chronic labor shortage on their farms.
Cannot be inferred(E) The adherence to customary law was more rigid in regions with relatively large numbers of free black citizens.
the adherence is not discussed-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3. The author of the passage most probably refers to Anthony Johnson and his family in order to
Pre-thinking
Purpose question
The author clearly wants to contrast with the reasoning offered by B&I study. They fought he simply wanted to look for more opportunities but the author suggests that he was worried about the application of the laws
(A) provide a specific example of the potential shortcomings of Breen and Innes’s interpretation of historical events
in line with pre-thinking(B) provide a specific example of relevant
data overlooked by Breen and Innes in their discussion of historical events
Not in line with pre-thinking. The data is not overlooked(C) provide a specific example of data that Breen and Innes
might profitably have used in proving their thesis
Not in line with pre-thinking(D) argue that the standard interpretation of historical events is superior to Breen and Innes’s revisionist interpretation
Not in line with pre-thinking(E) argue that a new historiographical method is needed to provide a full and coherent reading of historical events
Not in line with pre-thinking-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4. The attitude of the author of the passage toward Breen and Innes’s study can best be described as one of
Pre-thinking
Author's attitude question
The authors initially argues against the fact that most of historians do not look sufficiently at the achievements of AAs. B&I do that so the author is favorable towards their study. Nonetheless the author pinpoints a shortcoming in their study.
(A) condescending dismissal
The author is favorable towards their study(B) wholehearted acceptance
"Nonetheless the author pinpoints a shortcoming in their study."(C) contentious challenge
The author never challenges their study(D) qualified approval
The authors indeed approves of their study. (E) sincere puzzlement
Out of scopeI was not super convinced about choice D but I marked it as the correct answer since all the other choices clearly don't make sense
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------5. The primary purpose of the passage is to
Pre-thinking
Main point question
Refer to main point above
(A) summarize previous interpretations
No summary(B) advocate a new approach
no new suggestion(C) propose and then illustrate a thesis
no proposition(D) present and evaluate an interpretation
In line with pre-thinking(E) describe a historical event
The passage describes a study.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------It is a good day to be alive!