Last visit was: 20 Apr 2026, 23:15 It is currently 20 Apr 2026, 23:15
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
gmatt1476
Joined: 04 Sep 2017
Last visit: 04 Feb 2026
Posts: 494
Own Kudos:
27,276
 [7]
Given Kudos: 72
Posts: 494
Kudos: 27,276
 [7]
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Skywalker18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Last visit: 15 Nov 2023
Posts: 1,974
Own Kudos:
10,156
 [7]
Given Kudos: 171
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 1,974
Kudos: 10,156
 [7]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,842
Own Kudos:
51,858
 [3]
Given Kudos: 6,333
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,842
Kudos: 51,858
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,842
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,333
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,842
Kudos: 51,858
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Explanation

5. The primary purpose of the passage is to

Explanation

Only (D) jibes with the fact that this is a review of somebody’s book—it’s as simple as that.

(A) is far too narrow; only in the opening sentence does the author “summarize previous interpretations.” The focus then changes.

(B) Also too narrow. The author praises a new historiographical approach in the passage’s second sentence, but then zeroes in on Breen’s and Innes’s book, which he isn’t advocating, but evaluating.

(C) The verb “propose” is wrong: The author isn’t proposing a thesis (of his own); he’s describing somebody else’s.

(E) The author’s discussing a book, not a “historical event.”

Answer: D

Hope it helps
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,842
Own Kudos:
51,858
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6,333
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,842
Kudos: 51,858
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Explanation

3. The author of the passage most probably refers to Anthony Johnson and his family in order to

Explanation

Details are usually mentioned to support bigger points. According to the passage, the Johnsons moved to escape worsening conditions in Virginia. The bigger point is that Breen and Innes underestimated those conditions. The Johnson’s situation, then, is mentioned to illustrate a shortcoming of B’s and I’s thesis (A).

(B) is tempting, but the point is not that Breen and Innes failed to note the specific case of the Johnsons. To “underemphasize” is not to “overlook.”

(C) Distortion: The Johnsons’ story is cited to criticize, not add support to, B’s and I’s thesis.

(D) Au contraire: According to the opening lines, the author is critical of the standard interpretation.

(E) Another distortion. The author cites a new historiographical approach (and praises Breen’s and Innes’s book for applying it) in the opening lines.

Answer: A

Hope it helps
User avatar
auradediligodo
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Last visit: 18 Nov 2021
Posts: 358
Own Kudos:
861
 [1]
Given Kudos: 67
Location: Switzerland
Concentration: General Management
GPA: 3.9
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi everyone,
All correct in a little less than 10 minutes.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


P1

Paragraph one starts with the author opinion about a general trend related to historians. She (the author) says that in general historians focus only on the "tragedies" of black american people and not on their achievements. Then we are given that two authors (B&I) are somehow two outliers who describe the achievements of african american people in the colonial age in some region of the north. They say that, even if Blakeys people were somehow disadvantaged, if black people worked hard enough, they could attain the same results as white people.

Brief summary: B&I study is presented

P2

Paragraph 2 states that the B&I show in their study that african american people had mote or less than same opportunities as white people even though the political power was not so well distributed.
Here the author introduces a contrast by stating that B&I might have overlooked some laws that discriminated African American people already before 1670. These laws were made when the percentage of African Americans started growing and it seems that such laws were discriminant. Plus we are given that an African American named Anthony moved to another place and while B&I interpret this as a simple reflection of the will to find new fortunes, the author suggests that Anthony might have acknowledged that for Afrian American people things started getting worse.

Brief summary: African America people according to B&I versus according to the author

Main Point

The main point is to evaluate B&I study

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


1. The author of the passage objects to many scholarly studies of African American history for which one of the following reasons?

Pre-thinking

Detail question

Let's refer to the first lines of P1

"For too many years scholars of African American history focused on the harm done by slaveholders and by the institution of slavery, rather than on what Africans in the United States were able to accomplish despite the effects of that institution. "


(A) Their emphases have been on statutory law rather than on customary law.
Not in line with pre-thinking and out of context

(B) They have ignored specific historical situations and personages in favor of broad interpretations.
Not in line with pre-thinking

(C) They have focused on the least eventful periods in African American history.
Not in line with pre-thinking

(D) They have underemphasized the economic system that was the basis of the institution of slavery.
Not in line with pre-thinking

(E) They have failed to focus to a sufficient extent on the achievements of African Americans.
in line with pre-thinking

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


2. Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage concerning the relationship between the African American population and the law in the Chesapeake Bay region of Virginia between 1650 and 1670?

Pre-thinking

Inference question

Let's refer to P2

" during the 1660s, when the proportion of African Americans in Virginia increased dramatically, Virginia tightened a law regulating interracial relations (1662) and enacted a statute prohibiting baptism from altering slave status (1667)."

We could infer that as the population of AA increased the laws were enacted


(A) The laws affecting black citizens were embodied in statutes much more gradually than were laws affecting white citizens.
We don't know this and cannot infer this

(B) As the percentage of black citizens in the population grew, the legal restrictions placed on them also increased.
Seems a reasonable inference

(C) Because of discriminatory laws, black farmers suffered more economic setbacks than did white farmers.
The information given does not allow us to draw such a conclusion

(D) Because of legal constraints on hiring indentured servants, black farmers faced a chronic labor shortage on their farms.
Cannot be inferred

(E) The adherence to customary law was more rigid in regions with relatively large numbers of free black citizens.
the adherence is not discussed


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


3. The author of the passage most probably refers to Anthony Johnson and his family in order to

Pre-thinking

Purpose question

The author clearly wants to contrast with the reasoning offered by B&I study. They fought he simply wanted to look for more opportunities but the author suggests that he was worried about the application of the laws


(A) provide a specific example of the potential shortcomings of Breen and Innes’s interpretation of historical events
in line with pre-thinking

(B) provide a specific example of relevant data overlooked by Breen and Innes in their discussion of historical events
Not in line with pre-thinking. The data is not overlooked

(C) provide a specific example of data that Breen and Innes might profitably have used in proving their thesis
Not in line with pre-thinking

(D) argue that the standard interpretation of historical events is superior to Breen and Innes’s revisionist interpretation
Not in line with pre-thinking

(E) argue that a new historiographical method is needed to provide a full and coherent reading of historical events
Not in line with pre-thinking

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


4. The attitude of the author of the passage toward Breen and Innes’s study can best be described as one of

Pre-thinking

Author's attitude question

The authors initially argues against the fact that most of historians do not look sufficiently at the achievements of AAs. B&I do that so the author is favorable towards their study. Nonetheless the author pinpoints a shortcoming in their study.



(A) condescending dismissal
The author is favorable towards their study

(B) wholehearted acceptance
"Nonetheless the author pinpoints a shortcoming in their study."

(C) contentious challenge
The author never challenges their study

(D) qualified approval
The authors indeed approves of their study.

(E) sincere puzzlement
Out of scope

I was not super convinced about choice D but I marked it as the correct answer since all the other choices clearly don't make sense

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


5. The primary purpose of the passage is to

Pre-thinking

Main point question

Refer to main point above


(A) summarize previous interpretations
No summary

(B) advocate a new approach
no new suggestion

(C) propose and then illustrate a thesis
no proposition

(D) present and evaluate an interpretation
In line with pre-thinking

(E) describe a historical event
The passage describes a study.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



It is a good day to be alive!
User avatar
mSKR
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Last visit: 10 Mar 2024
Posts: 1,211
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Posts: 1,211
Kudos: 959
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Q1 got wrong.

Hi AndrewN sir : Please clarify what's wrong with my thought?

Sajjad1994 : please post official explanation for Q1

Quote:
1. The author of the passage objects to many scholarly studies of African American history for which one of the following reasons?

For too many years scholars of African American history focused on the harm done by slaveholders and by the institution of slavery, rather than on what Africans in the United States were able to accomplish despite the effects of that institution.
Scholars focused on something rather than African WERE ABLE TO ACCOMPLISH\

Quote:
(B) They have ignored specific historical situations and personages in favor of broad interpretations.

I choose B , First of all I rejected E so I had to choose among 4 others options. I choose B because:
i. ignored what Africans WERE ABLE TO ACHIEVE ( some situation)
ii. they focused on harm done which was more popular at that time – more broader topic to discuss.


Quote:
(E) They have failed to focus to a sufficient extent on the achievements of African Americans.
I rejected E because:
i. WERE ABLE TO ACHIEVE given in passage doesn’t mean they achieved as given in option
ii. FAILED TO FOCUS: maybe they paid attention but didn’t want to write about it. Failed to focus seems too extreme as in the passage it is given as scholars focused on X rather than Y: It should not mean failed to focus on Y


Thanks!
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,490
Own Kudos:
7,660
 [2]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,490
Kudos: 7,660
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mSKR
Q1 got wrong.

Hi AndrewN sir : Please clarify what's wrong with my thought?

Sajjad1994 : please post official explanation for Q1

Quote:
1. The author of the passage objects to many scholarly studies of African American history for which one of the following reasons?

For too many years scholars of African American history focused on the harm done by slaveholders and by the institution of slavery, rather than on what Africans in the United States were able to accomplish despite the effects of that institution.
Scholars focused on something rather than African WERE ABLE TO ACCOMPLISH\

Quote:
(B) They have ignored specific historical situations and personages in favor of broad interpretations.

I choose B , First of all I rejected E so I had to choose among 4 others options. I choose B because:
i. ignored what Africans WERE ABLE TO ACHIEVE ( some situation)
ii. they focused on harm done which was more popular at that time – more broader topic to discuss.


Quote:
(E) They have failed to focus to a sufficient extent on the achievements of African Americans.
I rejected E because:
i. WERE ABLE TO ACHIEVE given in passage doesn’t mean they achieved as given in option
ii. FAILED TO FOCUS: maybe they paid attention but didn’t want to write about it. Failed to focus seems too extreme as in the passage it is given as scholars focused on X rather than Y: It should not mean failed to focus on Y


Thanks!
Hello, mSKR. Even though you have the correct line right under your nose, you seem to want to bend over backwards to go against the obvious. The focus that you singled out in (E) is the same word used in the line in question from the passage. If authors focused on A, rather than on B, then you can restate this notion as, Authors have failed to focus on B to a sufficient extent. Do not forget about that last part—to a sufficient extent—which cushions the severity of failed as a standalone word.

Then, what Africans in the United States were able to accomplish is most certainly synonymous with the achievements of African Americans. Apart from a word-for-word repetition, I can think of no better way to match the answer with the first line of the passage.

Meanwhile, choice (B) looks okay, except that specific historical situations and personages should also come straight from the line of text you quoted. I see a reference to Africans in the latter part of that line, not to specific historical personages or situations.

I think this is a case in which you turned the microscope to 300X and lost sight of the surrounding information in the process. It is true that you want to look to debate the relative merits of each answer choice, but less resistance is better than conjuring up additional information any day.

- Andrew
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,399
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,399
Kudos: 1,009
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
494 posts
358 posts