Erythropoietin, known also as EPO, is a glycoprotein hormone that cont

Question

Erythropoietin, known also as EPO, is a glycoprotein hormone that controls the production of red blood cells in a process called erythropoiesis. When the kidneys detect a lack of oxygen flowing through the bloodstream, they secrete this glycoprotein, increasing the production of red blood cells, the body’s primary method of transporting oxygen to tissues and muscles. Typically a human’s hematocrit level, the percentage of red blood cells in the bloodstream, is between 40 and 45. For most adult males, a hematocrit level of less than 42 is said to be anemic, meaning that red blood cells are in dangerously low supply; this number is substantially less for women.

Synthetic EPO is used to boost low hematocrit levels in chemotherapy patients and those suffering from kidney disease, who are unable to maintain the necessary levels without frequent EPO injections. Perhaps more famously, it is also used illicitly by many endurance athletes seeking to gain a competitive advantage by artificially increasing their red blood cell count. Traditionally, athletes have trained at high altitude to achieve a similar natural effect, but today more and more have chosen to artificially boost red blood cell activity through the use of synthetic EPO.

For all its negative publicity, synthetic EPO remains a positive medical advancement to treat anemia and prevent hypoxia, the condition in which tissues are deprived of oxygen. Researchers continue to improve the effectiveness of synthetic EPO and even to develop a new glycoprotein—called novel erythropoiesis-stimulating protein (NESP) —which eliminates several drawbacks of EPO in its current form. NESP not only requires smaller doses, but also lasts longer, eliminating the need for frequent and often-painful IV administration, which can have complications. Still, unlike the natural stimulus that occurs with the release of EPO, any artificial stimulus of red blood cell production has potential risks, as it raises hemoglobin to the desired levels above 15 grams per deciliter far too quickly. The body cannot properly adjust to the quick change in blood viscosity and substantial cardiac risk results. Given that risk, synthetic EPO must be highly regulated by the FDA so that its use is limited to medical necessity, not athletic performance enhancement.   1 
 A 
 1. According to the passage, which one of the following is a challenge in using synthetic EPO to treat patients?

(A) It has to be administered more frequently and in larger doses than is ideal.
(B) It does not increase hematocrit levels as quickly as naturally occurring EPO does.
(C) It has more cardiovascular risk than other treatments.
(D) It is frequently stolen by those seeking performance enhancement.
(E) It can result in dangerously low hematocrit levels.

2 
 C 
2. Which of the following can be inferred about training at high altitude?

(A) It is not as effective as synthetic EPO at increasing red blood cells in an athlete.
(B) It does not allow athletes to reach levels of hemoglobin above 15 grams per deciliter.
(C) It increases hemoglobin levels in an athlete more slowly than synthetic EPO does.
(D) It poses no health risks to the athlete.
(E) It does not increase the viscosity of blood to a dangerous level.

3 
 B 
 3. All of the following are potential risks of synthetic EPO except that it ______ .

(A) can raise hemoglobin levels too quickly.
(B) increases hemoglobin to levels above 15 grams per deciliter.
(C) abruptly increases blood viscosity.
(D) increases the likelihood of cardiac problems.
(E) needs to be administered frequently.

4 
 E 
 4. Which of the following can properly be inferred from the passage?

(A) Training at high altitude is safer than using synthetic EPO.
(B) A higher percentage of athletes are using performance enhancing drugs than in the past.
(C) NESP is a more effective treatment for raising hematocrit levels than synthetic EPO.
(D) NESP carries fewer risks than synthetic EPO.
(E) Kidneys have some mechanism for monitoring oxygen levels.

souvik101990 · Accepted Answer

Here are the OEs

Q1:

As for all detail-oriented questions, you must go back and find the necessary information to answer the question. Synthetic EPO is introduced in the second paragraph, but most of the details about how it is used come in the third paragraph. In the second and third sentences of the third paragraph, you learn that NESP eliminates several drawbacks of EPO by requiring smaller doses and less-frequent injections. Therefore, it must be true that large doses and frequent administration are challenges in using EPO (synonymous with drawbacks), so answer choice A is correct. It is easy, however, to miss this information and fall for one of the other choices. For answer choice B, the passage suggests naturally occurring EPO raises levels more slowly, not more quickly, so answer choice B is incorrect. For answer choice C, the common incorrect choice, you know that synthetic EPO has cardiovascular risk, but you do not know how that risk compares to other treatments. The statement in answer choice C may or may not be true, because this inference is far outside the scope of the passage. For answer choice D, while you know that synthetic EPO is used by athletes seeking performance enhancement, you do not know how they obtain that EPO. (Do they steal it or just get it from doctors?) For answer choice E, it is suggested that synthetic EPO helps increase low hematocrit levels, so it would be illogical to conclude that it can result in dangerously low hematocrit levels.

Q2:

Because training was discussed in the second paragraph, your natural tendency is to look there, but the more important information lies in the third paragraph. This is another classic example of misdirection; they tempt you to look in one place but the answer really lies elsewhere. Consider this sentence from the third paragraph: “Still, unlike the natural stimulus that occurs with the release of EPO, any artificial stimulus of red blood cell production has potential risks, as it raises hemoglobin to the desired levels above 15 grams per deciliter far too quickly.” Since training at high altitude is well defined as a “natural” stimulation of red blood cell production in the second paragraph, you can be sure from the italicized sentence above that the stimulation occurs more slowly with natural EPO that it does with synthetic EPO. Again, this is easy to miss but well defined when you put it together (as with most difficult correct answers in Reading Comp). Answer choice C must be correct. Of course, the other answer choices will be tempting but not inferable. While you might guess answer choice A to be true, there is simply no evidence for it. While it is true that many athletes are choosing synthetic EPO over traditional training, this does not mean it is more effective. It just might be easier! No evidence is given that synthetic EPO works better than training at high altitude for increasing hemoglobin. For answer choice B, no evidence is given for what levels of hemoglobin can be reached with high altitude training. For answer choice D, while the health risks of synthetic EPO are well defined, there is no discussion about health risks of training at high altitude. While you might be able to infer training at high altitude is safer than synthetic EPO in terms of one component (it raises hemoglobin levels more slowly), high-altitude training could pose many other health risks (and probably does). Be very suspicious of any answer choice that is so categorical; it is unlikely that you could ever prove such a statement. For answer choice E, you know that the rapid increase of viscosity caused by synthetic EPO is dangerous, but you do not know anything about the risk of high viscosity on its own and whether high training raises the blood viscosity to dangerous levels. NOTE: Most difficult incorrect answer choices in Reading Comp reference something discussed in the passage but go just beyond what is inferable.

Q3:

While not as difficult as the last two, this question still has its pitfalls. Most of the risks of synthetic EPO are in the third paragraph, but you may have to look in the second. Answer choice A is clearly defined as a risk of synthetic EPO, as you can see from this section: “any artificial stimulus of red blood cell production has potential risks, as it raises hemoglobin to the desired levels above 15 grams per deciliter far too quickly.” Answer choice B is the correct answer, as it is not a risk of synthetic EPO. As you can see from the italicized section above, levels above 15 are “desired,” so this is not a risk. Answer choice C addresses the same issue as answer choice A and is a well-defined risk. The cardiac risk in answer choice D is well defined in the third paragraph. However, the risk associated with answer choice E is harder to find; therefore answer choice E is the common incorrect answer choice on this problem. From the section in the second paragraph “who are unable to maintain the necessary levels without frequent EPO injections” and the section in the third paragraph that references the frequency of injections as a drawback of EPO, it is logical to infer the frequency required is a risk: If patients cannot get injections frequently their health will be compromised.

Q4:

In this problem, there are no hints given in the question stem about where to look. In questions like this, go to the answer choices and examine them individually, finding clues about where to look. Answer choice A is too broad and categorical. You know that one component of high altitude training is safer than the use of synthetic EPO; it raises hemoglobin levels more slowly. But it could be that, overall, high-altitude training is much more dangerous than the use of synthetic EPO. Answer choice B is incorrect for similar reasons. You know that there has been an increase in the use of synthetic EPO by athletes, but you know nothing about other performance-enhancing drugs. Answer choice B goes way beyond the scope of information provided in this passage and is thus incorrect. For answer choice C, you only learn in the passage that NESP eliminates several drawbacks of EPO. You do not know whether it is more effective at raising hematocrit levels. Likewise for answer choice D: You know that NESP corrects several drawbacks of EPO, but you know nothing about its overall risks. It may have many more risks than EPO, but they are simply not discussed in this passage. If you managed to avoid temptation in answer choices A through D, then answer choice E is relatively easy to prove with this sentence in the first paragraph: “When kidneys detect a lack of oxygen flowing through the bloodstream, they secrete this glycoprotein, increasing the production of red blood cells, the body’s primary method of transporting oxygen to tissues and muscles.”

aditya8062 · Answer

my take of the above RC is as follows : 
1)  A  : It has to be administered more frequently and in larger doses than is ideal 
2)  C  :  It increases hemoglobin levels in an athlete more slowly than synthetic EPO does. 
3)  C   abruptly increases blood viscosity. 
4)  E :   Kidneys have some mechanism for monitoring oxygen levels.

kindly post the answers !!

niyantg · Answer

8 mins

1. A - It has to be administered more frequently and in larger doses than is ideal.
2. E - It does not increase the viscosity of blood to a dangerous level.
3. E - needs to be administered frequently.
4. E - Kidneys have some mechanism for monitoring oxygen levels.

PiyushK · Answer

A, C , B and A. 
1. (A) It has to be administered more frequently and in larger doses than is ideal. << In treating patients, it's an issue mentioned in last paragraph.
2. (C) It increases hemoglobin levels in an athlete more slowly than synthetic EPO does. << both provided similar effect(para 2), but artificial method quickly increases the level(para 3).
3. (B) increases hemoglobin to levels above 15 grams per deciliter. << above 15 too quickly is the cause not above 15.
4. (A) Training at high altitude is safer than using synthetic EPO. << both provides similar effect(para 2), but natural methods do not increases level above 15 as quickly. Thus training at high altitude is safer.

Mahmud6 · Answer

souvik101990

3.
"The body cannot properly adjust to the quick change in blood viscosity". This change doesn't indicate any direction. So, how can we say it is increasing?

4.
"Researchers continue to  improve the   effectiveness  of synthetic EPO and even to develop a new glycoprotein—called novel erythropoiesis-stimulating protein (NESP)" doesn't it mean that NESP is more effective than synthetic EPO?

goforgmat · Answer

3. It can be increasing or decreasing. But we can infer that when the RBCs increase there will be an increase in viscosity not decrease. Hence we can safely infer that the viscosity increases. Even then if you have a doubt option 2 for the 3rd question only says that the Rbc levels increase by a certain number which is no where stated as risk but how fast one's body reaches that level is . Hence the correct answer will be 2.

4. As you have quoted effectiveness of the EPO is increased but no where it is stated that NESP is more effective in raising RBC levels than EPO. The author only states the advantages which includes longer effect of the injected RBCs and less frequent admission of the NESP. 
When we effective it means that the drug has to perform better in increasing the RBCs and this is nowhere implied or mentioned. Hence for these reasons option 3 cannot be inferred.

jawele · Answer

1. According to the passage, which one of the following is a challenge in using synthetic EPO to treat patients?

(A) It has to be administered more frequently and in larger doses than is ideal. "Researchers continue to improve the effectiveness of synthetic EPO and even to develop a new glycoprotein—called novel erythropoiesis-stimulating protein (NESP) —which eliminates several drawbacks of EPO in its current form. NESP not only requires smaller doses, but also lasts longer, eliminating the need for frequent and often-painful IV administration" - sums up the point
(B) It does not increase hematocrit levels as quickly as naturally occurring EPO does. the reverse is true: "it raises hemoglobin to the desired levels above 15 grams per deciliter far too quickly"
(C) It has more cardiovascular risk than other treatments. while it does have some drawbacks, we can't compare it all other treatments, about which we don't know from the passage
(D) It is frequently stolen by those seeking performance enhancement. "stolen"? I think this is a stretch
(E) It can result in dangerously low hematocrit levels. "Synthetic EPO is used to boost low hematocrit levels <...>"

2. Which of the following can be inferred about training at high altitude?

(A) It is not as effective as synthetic EPO at increasing red blood cells in an athlete. " Traditionally, athletes have trained at high altitude to achieve a similar natural effect <...>"
(B) It does not allow athletes to reach levels of hemoglobin above 15 grams per deciliter. "EPO raises hemoglobin to the desired levels above 15 grams per deciliter" and "athletes have trained at high altitude to achieve a similar natural effect" let us infer this
(C) It increases hemoglobin levels in an athlete more slowly than synthetic EPO does. "EPO raises hemoglobin to the desired levels above 15 grams per deciliter far too quickly", but increasing it naturally takes time
(D) It poses no health risks to the athlete. too extreme, maybe you can fall off a cliff or something as we're talking about "training at high altitudes" in general terms
(E) It does not increase the viscosity of blood to a dangerous level. not given, maybe it does in some circumstances

3. All of the following are potential risks of synthetic EPO except that it ______ .

(A) can raise hemoglobin levels too quickly. "it raises hemoglobin to the desired levels above 15 grams per deciliter far too quickly <...>"
(B) increases hemoglobin to levels above 15 grams per deciliter. "it raises hemoglobin to the desired levels above 15 grams per deciliter"
(C) abruptly increases blood viscosity. "The body cannot properly adjust to the quick change in blood viscosity <...>"
(D) increases the likelihood of cardiac problems. "<...> substantial cardiac risk results."
(E) needs to be administered frequently. "<...>, eliminating the need for frequent <...>, which can have complications"

4. Which of the following can properly be inferred from the passage?

(A) Training at high altitude is safer than using synthetic EPO. yes, in terms of increasing red blood cells, but not generally - we simply don't know
(B) A higher percentage of athletes are using performance enhancing drugs than in the past. "more and more" doesn't give us much information to infer this - too broad
(C) NESP is a more effective treatment for raising hematocrit levels than synthetic EPO. NESP is in the development phase, and the removal of several drawbacks of EPO doesn't translate to greater effectiveness
(D) NESP carries fewer risks than synthetic EPO. no information about its effects on people is discussed
(E) Kidneys have some mechanism for monitoring oxygen levels. correct: "When the kidneys detect a lack of oxygen flowing through the bloodstream, they secrete this glycoprotein, increasing the production of red blood cells <...>"

kornn · Answer

Dear  VeritasKarishma   DmitryFarber   VeritasPrepBrian ,

Why is Q.4 choice D. wrong?
 
According to the passage:
 
From the above sentence, how could you possibly interpret that  the more effective NESP  have THE SAME OR MORE OVERALL RISKS than  the less effective synthetic EPO ? 
Could you please give an example for the scenario that fits such interpretation?

DmitryFarberMPrep · Answer

varotkorn First, notice that the sentence you're citing mentions nothing about risks at all, just drawbacks, so it provides zero support for D. The subsequent sentence mentions exactly one risk--the potential for complications due to frequent IV administration. So apparently NESP reduces this one risk, but that's all we really know about it. There could be many other new risks. Perhaps it works faster and therefore raises the cardiac risk even higher. Perhaps it can interact poorly with other drugs. For all we know, it may make you burst into flame or feel a compulsive urge to insult boxing champions. My point is that we simply know nothing about the overall risks.

In general, we can never say "X is more/less than Y" just because one aspect of that difference has been addressed. If jelly beans are lower in fat than almonds, and we know that fat is bad for us, that doesn't allow us to infer that jelly beans are healthier for us than almonds.

In general, we can never say "X is more/less than Y" just because one aspect of that difference has been addressed. If jelly beans are lower in fat than almonds, and we know that fat is bad for us, that doesn't allow us to infer that jelly beans are healthier for us than almonds.

saynchalk · Answer

6 and a half minutes but I got the last 2 questions wrong. I'm quite confused with the last question. I knew that option E is inferable, but it wasn't the central point of the passage so I went for option D, which is still somewhat inferable from the passage. I understand the OA, but I was under the impression that specifics related to the whole passage outweigh other options like the Kidney related point. This happens often when I narrow the options down to 2, but go for the answer that addresses the issue more broadly discussed in the question.

Any tips on how I should approach it?

Any tips on how I should approach it?

DmitryFarberMPrep · Answer

Any time you're trying to figure out which answer is preferable or "outweighs" another, you need to find a different approach. The right answer must be right, and the wrong answers must all be wrong. We shouldn't have to consider what the GMAT writers like or what is more important in general terms. In the case of an inference question, unless the question itself prompts us for something relating to the overall point, we are just looking for something provably true. If you know that E is inferable, then you should select that for sure. D isn't "somewhat inferable," because we don't know the risks of NESP. It eliminates one potential source of complications, but it may introduce others.

In any case, while D is a somehwhat broader point than E, we haven't been asked for a broad point, so that should't affect our evaluation. In fact, it's quite common for the right answer to an inference question to be a random, narrow, uninteresting point that just happens to be provable. Answers like that are hard to spot as correct, so they are a good go-to when the writers want a tough one.

kabirgandhi · Answer

Why are A and D wrong in Q4?

WhitEngagePrep   KarishmaB   MartyMurray

egmat · Answer

Great question! Let's examine why choices (A) and (D) cannot be properly inferred from the passage. This is a classic GMAT trap where answer choices seem reasonable but go beyond what the text actually supports.

Why (A) is Wrong: "Training at high altitude is safer than using synthetic EPO"
 
Look at what the passage  actually  says about high altitude training:
 
 "Traditionally, athletes have trained at high altitude to achieve a  similar natural effect " 
 That's it - just that it produces a similar effect naturally

Now look at what it says about synthetic EPO risks:
 
 Raises hemoglobin "far too quickly" 
 Causes "substantial cardiac risk" 
 Body "cannot properly adjust to the quick change in blood viscosity"  
 
The Gap:  The passage never compares the safety of these two methods. While we know synthetic EPO has risks, the passage is  completely silent  on whether high altitude training has any risks. For this to be a proper inference, we'd need the passage to either:
 
 State that high altitude training has no/fewer risks, OR 
 Compare the two methods' safety profiles  
 
Why (D) is Wrong: "NESP carries fewer risks than synthetic EPO" 
Here's what the passage says about NESP:
 
 "eliminates several  drawbacks  of EPO" 
 Requires "smaller doses" 
 "lasts longer" 
 Eliminates need for "frequent and often-painful IV administration"  
 
Critical sentence:  "Still,  unlike the natural stimulus  that occurs with the release of EPO,  any artificial stimulus  of red blood cell production has potential risks, as it raises hemoglobin to the desired levels above 15 grams per deciliter far too quickly."
 
The Gap:  The word "any" includes NESP! The passage explicitly states that NESP, being an artificial stimulus, still has the same fundamental cardiac risks from raising hemoglobin too quickly. The "drawbacks" NESP eliminates are about  convenience and administration , not the core safety risks.
 
Key GMAT Strategy:  In inference questions, stick to what's explicitly stated or necessarily implied. Don't make logical leaps, no matter how reasonable they seem. The correct answer (E) works because if kidneys can "detect a lack of oxygen," they  must  have some detection mechanism - this is a necessary logical connection, not an assumption.
 
Remember:  "Seems reasonable" ≠ "Can be properly inferred" on the GMAT!

Erythropoietin, known also as EPO, is a glycoprotein hormone that cont

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Reading Comprehension (RC) Questions

Erythropoietin, known also as EPO, is a glycoprotein hormone that cont

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards