| Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 19:32 |
It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 19:32 |
|
|
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
2011 Application Results for GMAT Club Members
| Admissions Results for 2011 Application Season | ||||||||||
| Applied | Admitted | 2011 GMAT Club Admission % | General Admission % | Difference 2011 | Waitlisted | Dinged | UNKNOWN | Matriculating* | Difference 2010 | |
| Booth | 341 | 62 | 18% | 22% | -18% | 43 | 155 | 81 | 38 | 76% |
| Columbia | 242 | 55 | 23% | 15% | 48% | 11 | 31 | 145 | 40 | 11% |
| Darden | 178 | 50 | 28% | 26% | 7% | 20 | 20 | 88 | 26 | 0% |
| Duke Fuqua | 263 | 96 | 37% | 24% | 54% | 32 | 28 | 107 | 51 | 0% |
| Haas | 191 | 32 | 17% | 12% | 44% | 31 | 32 | 96 | 18 | 40% |
| HBS | 143 | 28 | 20% | 12% | 63% | 6 | 14 | 95 | 24 | 145% |
| Johnson | 56 | 21 | 38% | 23% | 60% | 5 | 0 | 30 | 12 | 0% |
| Kellogg | 485 | 148 | 31% | 20% | 53% | 81 | 130 | 126 | 86 | 76% |
| MIT Sloan | 202 | 41 | 20% | 13% | 56% | 9 | 71 | 81 | 26 | -20% |
| NY Stern | 209 | 70 | 33% | 13% | 155% | 44 | 21 | 74 | 37 | 32% |
| Ross | 279 | 140 | 50% | 25% | 98% | 41 | 20 | 78 | 99 | 0% |
| Stanford | 101 | 11 | 11% | 7% | 61% | 5 | 85 | 0 | 9 | 38% |
| Tuck | 188 | 48 | 26% | 20% | 26% | 45 | 31 | 64 | 26 | 123% |
| Wharton | 225 | 34 | 15% | 17% | -10% | 51 | 32 | 108 | 24 | 6% |
| Yale | 219 | 58 | 26% | 17% | 53% | 26 | 135 | 26 | 0% | |
Averages
These are averages across the board, so in general they don't apply to each individual school since numbers vary quite a bit - these are only for a general trend.Surprises
The biggest surprise was Booth! The difference between GMAT Club Members and general applicants was -18%Leaders in 2011
- NY Stern - application rate of GMAT Club members was 155% that of average (33% admitted vs. 13% average admission rate). Compare this to the 74% last year2011 vs 2010 Admission Rates
General Admission Trends - Increasing (Schools Are Becoming Less Selective)
Which School Has the Most GMAT Clubbers?
| GMAT Club Share of Students | |||
| Class Size | Matriculating* | % of Class | |
| Booth | 579 | 38 | 7% |
| Columbia | 739 | 40 | 5% |
| Darden | 339 | 26 | 8% |
| Duke Fuqua | 440 | 51 | 12% |
| Haas | 243 | 18 | 7% |
| HBS | 918 | 24 | 3% |
| Johnson | 275 | 12 | 4% |
| Kellogg | 647 | 86 | 13% |
| MIT Sloan | 401 | 26 | 6% |
| NY Stern | 314 | 37 | 12% |
| Ross | 488 | 99 | 20% |
| Stanford | 389 | 9 | 2% |
| Tuck | 280 | 26 | 9% |
| Wharton | 817 | 24 | 3% |
| Yale | 231 | 26 | 11% |
Success stories and strategies from high-scoring candidates.