nightblade354
Darden 15? I want to know how much Cornell and Duke and Michigan paid us for these rankings.
Nuts and bolts, UVA got screwed!
Posted from my mobile device
I wish we got paid for these rankings, but (un)fortunately no!
Here are some key facts:
- At 31.54%, Darden's yield rate is the sixt lowest among 37 schools we evaluated. Cornell, Duke, and Michigan have yield rates of 37.04%, 52.81%, and 33.24% respectively.
- With an acceptance rate of 39.38%, Darden stands as the least competitive of the lot. Cornell, Duke, and Michigan have an acceptance rate of 29.93%, 22.14%, and 38.00% respectively.
- In terms of diversity, Darden's class has 36.9% females whereas Cornell, Fuqua, and Michigan have 41.4%, 46.6%, and 41% female enrollment respectively. Additionally, Darden's class has 14% US minority enrollment whereas Cornell, Fuqua, and Michigan have 22%, 24%, and 24.8% US minority enrollment respectively.
- With 4 out of 5, the peer assessment score of Darden is lowest when compared with Cornell, Fuqua, and Michigan. Also, with 4.1 out of 5, the recruiter assessment score of Darden ties with Cornell for the lowest among all of the above stated schools.
I am assuming your notion of Darden being a higher ranked school of the four arises from the fact that Darden has the best employment outcomes. Though employment is one of the major factors we have considered in calculating the ranks, there are many other factors where Darden fall behind its contemporaries.
The schools are evaluated holistically and are ranked accordingly.