Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 16:06 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 16:06
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,070
 [56]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
51
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,070
 [28]
12
Kudos
Add Kudos
16
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Kinshook
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,793
Own Kudos:
5,508
 [1]
Given Kudos: 161
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 5,793
Kudos: 5,508
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
karanbadalia
Joined: 27 Oct 2023
Last visit: 13 Aug 2025
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
33
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q90 V83 DI89
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q90 V83 DI89
Posts: 13
Kudos: 33
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­From the info available, we can conclude that either the avg of men = avg of women, or number of men = number of women.

Therefore from statement 1 and 2 individually, we get that avg is equal.
So answer is D.
User avatar
gaubeo308
Joined: 07 Jul 2024
Last visit: 30 Jul 2024
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
20
 [1]
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 19
Kudos: 20
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Solution: Consider Statement (2). Since the sum of the average salaries of the men and the women is $88,000, the average salary of the men in the company is $88,000 divided by 2, equal $44,000. Statement (2) alone is sufficient to answer the question. 

Consider Statement (1). Let the number of men be n and the number of women be m, where n>m. Then, we have \( \frac{(x_1+...+x_n+y_1+...+y_m)}{(m+n) }= \frac{(x_1+...+x_n)}{n} + \frac{(y_1+...+y_m)}{m}\). Simplifying this equation, we eventually get to the answer that the average salary of men is $44,000. Therefore, Statement (1) is sufficient to answer the question. Answer choice D is correct. ­
User avatar
Fido10
Joined: 12 Aug 2020
Last visit: 27 Aug 2024
Posts: 103
Own Kudos:
165
 [1]
Given Kudos: 298
Location: Morocco
Products:
Posts: 103
Kudos: 165
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
let's say M1, M2, ...Mm are the salaries of Men
and W1, W2, ...Ww are the salaries of women
and M is the number of Men
and W is the number of Women
and AM is average of the men
and AW the average salary of the women
We know that : the average (arithmetic mean) salary of all employees equals the average of the average (arithmetic mean) salary of the men and the average (arithmetic mean) salary of the women then
[(M1, M2, ...Mm)/M + (W1, W2, ...Ww)/W]/2 = (M1+ M2+ ...Mm+W1+ W2+ ...Ww)/(M+W)


(1) The number of men in the company is greater than the number of women.

(AM+AW)/2=(AM*M + AW*W)/(M+W)
=>2*AM*M + 2*AW*W = M*AM+M*AW+W*AW+W*AM
=>M*AM+AW*W =M*AW+W*AW
=>M(AM-AW) = W(AM-AW) (*)
in this case we have that M>W then for (*) to be true AM-AW should be 0, then AM=AW
Then, from AM +AW = 88.000 we can conclue that AM=44.000, sufficient
(2) The average salary of the men is equal to the average salary of the women in the company.­
AM +AW = 88.000
in this case, AM=AW then AM+AW=44.000, sufficient

ANSWER is D
User avatar
wwcd
Joined: 21 Apr 2024
Last visit: 12 May 2025
Posts: 46
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 83
Posts: 46
Kudos: 52
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
can someone please tell me why this step is wrong :
Quote:
  

\(\frac{mx + wy}{m + w} = \frac{x + y}{2}\)

\(2mx + 2wy= mx + my + wx + wy\)

\(mx + wy= my + wx\)

 
­
\(mx - my = wx - wy\)

\(m ( x - y ) = w ( x - y )\)

\(m = w\)



 ­@Kinshook, @karanbadalia , @gaubeo308
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
778,070
 [2]
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,070
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
wwcd
can someone please tell me why this step is wrong :
Quote:
  

\(\frac{mx + wy}{m + w} = \frac{x + y}{2}\)

\(2mx + 2wy= mx + my + wx + wy\)

\(mx + wy= my + wx\)

 
­
\(mx - my = wx - wy\)

\(m ( x - y ) = w ( x - y )\)

\(m = w\)



 ­@Kinshook, @karanbadalia , @gaubeo308
­
Note that we cannot divide \(m(x - y) = w(x - y)\) by (x - y) because (x - y) can be 0 and division by zero is not allowed. By dividing by (x - y), you would be incorrectly assuming that (x - y) does not equal zero, potentially excluding a valid case (observe that x = y satisfies the equation). As a rule, never reduce an equation by a variable (or by an expression containing a variable) if you are not certain that the variable (or expression with the variable) does not equal zero. Remember, we cannot divide by zero.

Hope this helps.
 ­
User avatar
mvgkannan
Joined: 23 Apr 2025
Last visit: 01 Oct 2025
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT Focus 1: 705 Q90 V85 DI80
WE:General Management (Government)
GMAT Focus 1: 705 Q90 V85 DI80
Posts: 58
Kudos: 36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Let A = average salary of all employees, X= Avg salary of Men, Y = Avg salary of Women, m= Total men and w = Total women.

By definition, A = (mX + wY)/(m+w),
but here extra detail is A = (X+Y)/2. Equating both shows that mX + wY = mY + wX. Now we have two scenarios,

Scenario I, m=w, then it is directly visible that A=X=Y X = 44000.
Scenario II, m is not equal to w. Here, from mX+ wY = mY + wX, we get (m-w)X = (m-w)Y, which again shows that X=Y and from above We get again X = 44000.

IMO no need of the statements at all. Directly we can say Option D. Whatever statement is given, ans is already clear.

Bunuel
­In a company, the average (arithmetic mean) salary of all employees equals the average of the average (arithmetic mean) salary of the men and the average (arithmetic mean) salary of the women. If the sum of the average salaries of the men and the women is $88,000, what is the average salary of the men in the company?

(1) The number of men in the company is greater than the number of women.
(2) The average salary of the men is equal to the average salary of the women in the company.­

A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked.
B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked.
C. BOTH statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question asked, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient to answer the question asked.
D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient to answer the question asked.
E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question asked, and additional data specific to the problem are needed.


­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­
Moderators:
Math Expert
105355 posts
496 posts