Hi arunbhati,I can see exactly where this is coming from. You're reading the rule
"Demi must perform if either Iris or Zozibini performs" and concluding that whenever Demi is on, Iris or Zozibini must have been on too. That's the one spot to fix.
The rule only runs one way"Demi must perform
if Iris or Zozibini performs" tells you what happens
when Iris or Zozibini is in. It does
not say the reverse. Demi is allowed to perform on her own - the rule never requires a trigger behind her.
Think of the arrow direction:
-
Iris or Zozibini → Demi (given)
- It does
not follow that
Demi → Iris or ZozibiniSo for the
Demi performs column, you start
with Demi already in, and you only follow the arrows that point
forward from her:
- Demi →
Paulina must perform
- Paulina →
Andrea must perform
That's it. Nobody forces Iris or Zozibini to join, so the minimum is
Demi, Paulina, Andrea = 3, not
4.
The reason the
Zozibini performs column gives
4 is that there you're
given Zozibini, and her arrow
does point to Demi: Zozibini → Demi → Paulina → Andrea. The extra person comes from the trigger being named for you - which doesn't happen in the Demi column.
Quick check to lock it inTake the rule
"Paulina must perform if Demi performs" (Demi → Paulina).
- If you're told
Paulina performs, does Demi have to be in?
No - Paulina could be there for another reason.
- If you're told
Demi performs, does Paulina have to be in?
Yes.Same logic with Demi and her triggers: knowing Demi is in tells you nothing about Iris or Zozibini. The arrow simply doesn't run backward.
Answer: Column 1 = 3; Column 2 = 4arunbhati
Hi Sir,
In first part, it is mentiond that Demi must perform if either Iris or Zozibini performs
So in first blank why 4 not occurs iris/zozibini, Demi, Paulina and Andrea