In order to answer this question we must define what an assumption is. An assumption is the crucial unstated logical link between the premise and conclusion and it must be true in order for the argument to be valid. This assumption can be seen quite clearly in the last sentence of the Climatologists claim:
"The discovery that similar weather patterns occurred during the Pliocene Epoch, when the earth experienced higher global temperatures, supports the claim that our current weather patterns are due to climate change."
So the climatologists argue that because there were similar weather patterns during the Pilocene Epoch, when the earth experienced higher global temperatures, to today, it follows that current weather patterns are also due to climate change.
A great way to see if a statement is the assumption, is to do a negation test. This means that while the assumption is necessary to the conclusion so that the argument holds, the opposite will undermine the argument so that it crumbles.
(A) "The conditions that caused similar weather patterns during the Pliocene Epoch
must be the same as those causing current weather patterns."
Let's negate this, "The conditions that caused similar weather patterns during the Pilocene Epoch
are not the same as those causing current weather patterns."
Well it's still possible that the argument holds. "Conditions" is a broad term and they don't necessarily have to be identical.
(B) "Other factors besides global temperatures, such as ocean currents or volcanic activity,
did not significantly influence weather patterns during the Pliocene Epoch."
"Other factors besides global temperatures, such as ocean currents or volcanic activity,
did significantly influence weather patterns during the Pliocene Epoch."
Well this changes everything. If other factors besides global temperatures did not influence weather factors, then we know that global temperatures were the primary reason for the weather patterns. But if other factors did indeed significantly influence weather patterns, then we can't make the link between global temperatures and weather patterns.
(C) "Without evidence of increased global temperatures, the claim that current weather patterns are due to climate change would not be credible."
An argument can still hold even if you do not have evidence. This does not undermine the argument.
(D) If global temperatures continue to rise, the frequency and severity of these weather patterns will certainly increase.
We are not interested in continue increaes of weather patterns.
(E) The mechanisms that caused climate change in the past are fundamentally different from those causing current climate change.
If anything this works against the argument.
Answer is B
Bunuel
Climatologists claim: The recent pattern of prolonged droughts followed by intense rainfalls is a clear indicator of climate change. This pattern results from increased global temperatures, which enhance the rate of water evaporation and lead to more stored moisture in the atmosphere. When the moisture is released, it results in heavy rains following drought periods. The discovery that similar weather patterns occurred during the Pliocene Epoch, when the earth experienced higher global temperatures, supports the claim that our current weather patterns are due to climate change.
The argument in the passage relies on which of the following assumptions?
(A) The conditions that caused similar weather patterns during the Pliocene Epoch must be the same as those causing current weather patterns.
(B) Other factors besides global temperatures, such as ocean currents or volcanic activity, did not significantly influence weather patterns during the Pliocene Epoch.
(C) Without evidence of increased global temperatures, the claim that current weather patterns are due to climate change would not be credible.
(D) If global temperatures continue to rise, the frequency and severity of these weather patterns will certainly increase.
(E) The mechanisms that caused climate change in the past are fundamentally different from those causing current climate change.