Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1912:30 PM EST
-01:30 PM EST
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2001:30 PM EST
-02:30 PM IST
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2407:00 PM PST
-08:00 PM PST
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
11 Jul 2025, 10:44
Kudos
Bookmarks
Conclusion
The women's suffrage movement in early northeastern America gained momentum rapidly, primarily because reform-oriented churches provided one of the few socially acceptable public venues where women could speak publicly and organize collective action.
Premise
Indeed, many meetings during the early stages of the movement were held in church buildings.
Reform-oriented churches at that time were among the few organizations still willing to allow women to speak and assemble publicly.
Implicit Assumption
If churches had not provided such public venues, the early movement would not have gained traction as quickly; that is, the absence of these "socially acceptable public spaces" would have significantly delayed the progress of the movement.
Option Analysis
A. "In several Southern states, due to minimal church involvement, the women's suffrage movement progressed more slowly."
– Direct corroboration: The lack of churches as public venues led to slower movement progress, thus supporting the causal hypothesis. → Strengthens the conclusion; correct.
B. "Although some pioneers had backgrounds in religious reform, they deliberately established secular organizations to avoid dependence on church institutions."
– Indicates a deliberate move away from church involvement by activists, thereby weakening the role attributed to churches. Does not support Greene's argument. → Irrelevant to strengthening.
C. "Many early organizers in northeastern regions were already active within church-sponsored reform networks before entering political advocacy."
– Only indicates their background with churches, but does not establish a causal relationship between "church venues" and accelerated movement progress. → Insufficient for reinforcing core assumptions.
D. "Regardless of church presence or absence, media coverage of suffrage movements in northeastern areas was more frequent than in other regions."
– Suggests that media coverage might be a key factor rather than church venues, potentially undermining the causal link proposed. → Does not support the argument.
E. "Early public petitions often used religious language even when submitted by secular groups."
– Merely notes a linguistic style related to religion without explaining how church venues provided organizational space for activism. → Irrelevant to the argument.
The women's suffrage movement in early northeastern America gained momentum rapidly, primarily because reform-oriented churches provided one of the few socially acceptable public venues where women could speak publicly and organize collective action.
Premise
Indeed, many meetings during the early stages of the movement were held in church buildings.
Reform-oriented churches at that time were among the few organizations still willing to allow women to speak and assemble publicly.
Implicit Assumption
If churches had not provided such public venues, the early movement would not have gained traction as quickly; that is, the absence of these "socially acceptable public spaces" would have significantly delayed the progress of the movement.
Option Analysis
A. "In several Southern states, due to minimal church involvement, the women's suffrage movement progressed more slowly."
– Direct corroboration: The lack of churches as public venues led to slower movement progress, thus supporting the causal hypothesis. → Strengthens the conclusion; correct.
B. "Although some pioneers had backgrounds in religious reform, they deliberately established secular organizations to avoid dependence on church institutions."
– Indicates a deliberate move away from church involvement by activists, thereby weakening the role attributed to churches. Does not support Greene's argument. → Irrelevant to strengthening.
C. "Many early organizers in northeastern regions were already active within church-sponsored reform networks before entering political advocacy."
– Only indicates their background with churches, but does not establish a causal relationship between "church venues" and accelerated movement progress. → Insufficient for reinforcing core assumptions.
D. "Regardless of church presence or absence, media coverage of suffrage movements in northeastern areas was more frequent than in other regions."
– Suggests that media coverage might be a key factor rather than church venues, potentially undermining the causal link proposed. → Does not support the argument.
E. "Early public petitions often used religious language even when submitted by secular groups."
– Merely notes a linguistic style related to religion without explaining how church venues provided organizational space for activism. → Irrelevant to the argument.
11 Jul 2025, 12:01
Kudos
Bookmarks
Greene's Argument: Early women's suffrage in the Northeast gained traction largely because reform-minded churches provided a space for women to speak publicly and organize.
A. In several southern states, where church involvement in suffrage activities was minimal, the women's suffrage movement developed more slowly.
B. Although some early suffrage activists had backgrounds in religious reform, they deliberately established secular organizations to avoid relying on church-based institutions.
C. Many early suffrage organizers in the Northeast were already active in church-run religious reform networks prior to their involvement in political advocacy.
D. Newspaper coverage of women’s suffrage was more frequent in northeastern states than in other areas of the United States, regardless of the presence of churches.
E. Public petitions supporting women’s voting rights in the early 1800s often used religious language, even when submitted by secular groups.
A. In several southern states, where church involvement in suffrage activities was minimal, the women's suffrage movement developed more slowly.
- It shows that where the proposed cause (church involvement) was absent or minimal, the effect (movement speed) was also different, thus strengthening the causal link Greene proposes.
B. Although some early suffrage activists had backgrounds in religious reform, they deliberately established secular organizations to avoid relying on church-based institutions.
- This directly weakens Greene's point. If activists deliberately avoided church reliance, it suggests churches were not the crucial enabling space Greene claims.
C. Many early suffrage organizers in the Northeast were already active in church-run religious reform networks prior to their involvement in political advocacy.
- That certainly shows a correlation that some suffragists were involved in church circles before branching into political activity. But Greene’s argument hinges on a causal claim i.e. those church spaces themselves provided the socially acceptable venues that enabled women to organize and thus significantly contributed to the early traction of the movement.
D. Newspaper coverage of women’s suffrage was more frequent in northeastern states than in other areas of the United States, regardless of the presence of churches.
- This offers an alternative explanation for the movement's traction in the Northeast that is independent of church involvement. It doesn't directly support Greene's claim about the churches' unique role. Irrelevant.
E. Public petitions supporting women’s voting rights in the early 1800s often used religious language, even when submitted by secular groups.
- While it shows the influence of religious language, it doesn't demonstrate that churches themselves were the spaces for organization and public speaking that Greene emphasizes.
11 Jul 2025, 12:38
Kudos
Bookmarks
Let's understand Greene's argument and Lin's counter-argument first:
Greene's point: Churches were very important for the early women's right to vote movement in the Northeast. They gave women a safe place to speak out and organize because there weren't many other places they could do that.
Lin's point: Churches weren't that important. The movement really sped up later when women started organizing in non-religious groups.
We need to find an option that makes Greene's argument stronger. Now let's check the options:
A. In several southern states, where church involvement in suffrage activities was minimal, the women's suffrage movement developed more slowly.
What it means: In places where churches weren't involved much, the movement didn't grow quickly.
How it relates to Greene: This supports Greene! If the movement was slow without church help, it suggests that church help (in the Northeast) was important for it to gain traction. It's like saying, "See? When churches weren't involved, it didn't do as well, proving they were key where they were involved."
Strengthens Greene? Yes, strongly.
B. Although some early suffrage activists had backgrounds in religious reform, they deliberately established secular organizations to avoid relying on church-based institutions.
What it means: Even if people started in churches, they specifically moved away from churches to organize.
How it relates to Greene: This actually weakens Greene's argument. It suggests that secular groups were preferred or necessary, not that churches were the main reason for gaining traction.
Strengthens Greene? No, it weakens.
C. Many early suffrage organizers in the Northeast were already active in church-run religious reform networks prior to their involvement in political advocacy.
What it means: The people who became leaders in the women's vote movement were often already involved in church groups.
How it relates to Greene: This shows a connection between church involvement and the people who led the movement. It suggests that churches might have been a training ground or a place where these leaders developed their skills and connections. This supports Greene's idea that churches provided an environment for the movement to gain traction, but maybe less directly than option A, which focuses on the movement's speed.
Strengthens Greene? Yes, it provides some support.
D. Newspaper coverage of women’s suffrage was more frequent in northeastern states than in other areas of the United States, regardless of the presence of churches.
What it means: News about women's voting rights was more common in the Northeast, and this happened whether or not churches were involved.
How it relates to Greene: This points to another possible reason for the movement's growth (media coverage) that has nothing to do with churches. It offers an alternative explanation, which weakens Greene's claim about the importance of churches.
Strengthens Greene? No, it weakens or is irrelevant.
E. Public petitions supporting women’s voting rights in the early 1800s often used religious language, even when submitted by secular groups.
What it means: The words used in petitions sometimes sounded religious, even if the group wasn't a church.
How it relates to Greene: This talks about the language of advocacy, not the places or methods of organization that Greene emphasizes (socially acceptable spaces, public speaking, collective action). It doesn't directly support the idea that churches provided the key organizational platform.
Strengthens Greene? Not strongly or directly.
From above, we can conclude Option A as the strongest answer because it directly supports Greene's idea that church involvement was a key factor in the early movement gaining traction by showing what happened in its absence.
Greene's point: Churches were very important for the early women's right to vote movement in the Northeast. They gave women a safe place to speak out and organize because there weren't many other places they could do that.
Lin's point: Churches weren't that important. The movement really sped up later when women started organizing in non-religious groups.
We need to find an option that makes Greene's argument stronger. Now let's check the options:
A. In several southern states, where church involvement in suffrage activities was minimal, the women's suffrage movement developed more slowly.
What it means: In places where churches weren't involved much, the movement didn't grow quickly.
How it relates to Greene: This supports Greene! If the movement was slow without church help, it suggests that church help (in the Northeast) was important for it to gain traction. It's like saying, "See? When churches weren't involved, it didn't do as well, proving they were key where they were involved."
Strengthens Greene? Yes, strongly.
B. Although some early suffrage activists had backgrounds in religious reform, they deliberately established secular organizations to avoid relying on church-based institutions.
What it means: Even if people started in churches, they specifically moved away from churches to organize.
How it relates to Greene: This actually weakens Greene's argument. It suggests that secular groups were preferred or necessary, not that churches were the main reason for gaining traction.
Strengthens Greene? No, it weakens.
C. Many early suffrage organizers in the Northeast were already active in church-run religious reform networks prior to their involvement in political advocacy.
What it means: The people who became leaders in the women's vote movement were often already involved in church groups.
How it relates to Greene: This shows a connection between church involvement and the people who led the movement. It suggests that churches might have been a training ground or a place where these leaders developed their skills and connections. This supports Greene's idea that churches provided an environment for the movement to gain traction, but maybe less directly than option A, which focuses on the movement's speed.
Strengthens Greene? Yes, it provides some support.
D. Newspaper coverage of women’s suffrage was more frequent in northeastern states than in other areas of the United States, regardless of the presence of churches.
What it means: News about women's voting rights was more common in the Northeast, and this happened whether or not churches were involved.
How it relates to Greene: This points to another possible reason for the movement's growth (media coverage) that has nothing to do with churches. It offers an alternative explanation, which weakens Greene's claim about the importance of churches.
Strengthens Greene? No, it weakens or is irrelevant.
E. Public petitions supporting women’s voting rights in the early 1800s often used religious language, even when submitted by secular groups.
What it means: The words used in petitions sometimes sounded religious, even if the group wasn't a church.
How it relates to Greene: This talks about the language of advocacy, not the places or methods of organization that Greene emphasizes (socially acceptable spaces, public speaking, collective action). It doesn't directly support the idea that churches provided the key organizational platform.
Strengthens Greene? Not strongly or directly.
From above, we can conclude Option A as the strongest answer because it directly supports Greene's idea that church involvement was a key factor in the early movement gaining traction by showing what happened in its absence.
