Bunuel
Thanks to NASA’s highly capable Mars orbiters, the agency had more information regarding potential landing sites for the 2011 Mars Mission than
they had in their prior missions.
A. they had in their prior missions
B. their prior missions had had
C. they had for prior mission
D. in their prior missions
E. for any prior missions
Explanation: Pronouns + Tenses + Redundancy/Awkwardness
• Collective nouns (such as “agency” in this sentence) are always singular.
• When the chronology is clear because of terms such as before/after/when/earlier/later…or because of a clear mention of dates, the use of past perfect tense is not required, though not incorrect either.
A. This answer choice incorrectly refers to the singular noun “agency” with the plural pronoun “they”; please remember, collective nouns (such as “agency” in this sentence) are always singular.
B. This answer choice incorrectly refers to the singular noun “agency” with the plural pronoun “their”; please remember, collective nouns (such as “agency” in this sentence) are always singular. Further, Option B needlessly uses the past perfect tense verb “had had”, rendering it needlessly wordy and awkward; this usage is unnecessary, as the word “prior” clearly denotes the order of events.
C. This answer choice incorrectly refers to the singular noun “agency” with the plural pronoun “they”; please remember, collective nouns (such as “agency” in this sentence) are always singular.
D. This answer choice incorrectly refers to the singular noun “agency” with the plural pronoun “their”; please remember, collective nouns (such as “agency” in this sentence) are always singular.
E. Correct. This answer choice avoids the pronoun error seen in Options A, B, C, and E, as it employs no pronouns. Further, Option E is free of any awkwardness or redundancy.
E is the best answer choice.