Quote:
Hi. Thank you so much for posting this. Unfortunatley for your friend, looks like the calculator works correctly. 😢. Bummer. I wish it were wrong.
I have never seen or heard of scores changing from what was shown to what was final. I know only one case where a person disputed their V49 and it was upgraded to V51 (as there were no mistakes made) but that was a number of years ago.
So, I don't know what happened, but I have not seen or heard of numbers/scores changing and updating. Since the overall score stayed the same, I am wondering if perhaps their mind played a trick on the test-taker or perhaps the test indeed made a calculation error (calculating something off - either verbal section or the overall score), displayed the wrong number and has now gotten the correct number... it is a mystery to me what happened.
What was the section order if you don't mind me asking?
Ah, yes! Thankfully, the calculator works fine.
I told Parth that maybe GMAT Blues and a lower-than-expected score got into your head, which is why you saw the Verbal Score wrong. His argument is, he has never seen sub-sectional percentiles EVER! (And obviously enough, that's just additional piece of data-not-required). This is the first time he saw his percentiles, mistaking them to be sectional scores. He clearly remembers first seeing a 79 and a 82 in the Verbal row. Oddly enough, a V 82 is 79th Percentile where as a V 79 is 51st Percentile. He argues, how did he see a correct set of Percentile-Score if "what he saw was wrong".
Unfortunately, neither do I have a counter argument nor do I personally think GMAC would make an error like this. Since there is no print out unlike Classic Times, there is no support / proof of the argument. Basically,
it is what it is, now

In my 705, I had a sectional split of Q90, V84, DI 81. My V84 was exactly 17/23 in accuracy with 7/10 in CR (88th percentile) and 10/13 in RC.
Parth's V79 is also a 17/23 but with 8/10 in CR (the 2 wrong ones are boldface questions) [with 51st Percentile!] and 9/13 in RC. Also, My DI 81 came with a 13/20 accuracy, which is the same for Parth, but he ended up with a DI 75.
Seems like in all 3 sections, he made errors on easy questions but answered tough ones correctly.
How Brutal is the game of GMAT! Don't know what to make of all this. Emails have been sent but Parth and I, both know, a score change is impossible.
Also, his sectional order was V - break - Q - DI.
He also had a 3-4 minute server lag between one of his RC questions. A good enough time to forget what was exactly in the passage. But that's again a common issue so all in all, GMAT God's weren't in his favor that day!