Last visit was: 27 Mar 2025, 13:15 It is currently 27 Mar 2025, 13:15
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
abcsayali
Joined: 12 Oct 2022
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 52
Own Kudos:
218
 [40]
Given Kudos: 52
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 705 Q90 V83 DI82
GRE 1: Q166 V150
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
38
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
MartyMurray
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 1,400
Own Kudos:
4,235
 [7]
Given Kudos: 135
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 1,400
Kudos: 4,235
 [7]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
8Harshitsharma
Joined: 25 Oct 2017
Last visit: 11 Mar 2025
Posts: 142
Own Kudos:
119
 [1]
Given Kudos: 723
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q87 V80 DI80
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GRE 1: Q165 V160
GRE 2: Q170 V162
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q87 V80 DI80
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GRE 1: Q165 V160
GRE 2: Q170 V162
Posts: 142
Kudos: 119
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GmatKnightTutor
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 4,796
Own Kudos:
1,484
 [3]
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 4,796
Kudos: 1,484
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Fun little question. I get it. I know answer choice (B) can be tempting. Let's get into this. No question like this on the gmatknight blog currently but it's an interesting one that a mathematical POV may be helpful with. 

Governor: After several years of large gains, our state’s housing market is posting smaller gains this year. Other areas of our economy grew slightly this year, but no more than in recent years. Thus, given these sources of tax revenue, this year’s overall tax revenue is likely to be higher than last year’s. Nevertheless, I am pessimistic about our ability to meet the financial obligations detailed in this year’s budget.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the governor’s pessimism?


Basically, we're looking for why the governor doesn't think financial obligations are going to be met this year.

A. Several items in the state’s budget for this year are required by law to be funded from sources other than tax revenue collected by the state.
Nope. We're not really given an indication how these OTHER SOURCES are doing. Only the state's housing market is kind of brought up in a negative way. In addition, the governor's position seems mainly based on TAX REVENUE - not non-tax revenue.

B. The financial obligations in this year’s budget are greater than the obligations in any previous year’s budget.
Interesting. It's not terrible to be fair. But imagine obligations went up by only 0.2% and technically hit an all time high... That doesn't necessarily mean tax revenue couldn't meet that obligation with only a small 1% total increase. Sure, tax revenue from housing may be down, but the other sectors could have "pulled" the total revenue up by an adequate amount. The passage does say that OTHER AREAS of the ECONOMY did grow. And the governor does mention that this year's total tax revenue IS LIKELY TO BE HIGHER than last year's.

C. Tax revenues associated with housing, such as property sales taxes and construction industry income taxes, will be higher this year than they were last year.
Nope. This is kind of going in the wrong direction. We're looking for something that means we won't meet financial obligations.

D. Fewer new housing-related jobs were created in the state this year than last year.
Nope. I understand this is something negative but it's not really based on the governor's position which is centered around tax revenue. Even if this is something that explains or is a byproduct of a SLOWING HOUSING sector, it doesn't explain why the governor thinks that EVEN THOUGH total tax revenue will probably go up, we're still not going to meet our financial obligations.

E. This year’s state budget is based on the assumption that tax revenue will grow at no less than the same rate as it has in recent years.
This is the answer. Basically, if, for example, you think that because tax revenue is going up by 5% or more every year for the past 10 years, that's it's okay to commit to increasing your expenditure (financial obligations) for next year by 5% as well, you could mess up. What if tax revenues do increase next year... but only by 2%!
User avatar
JoeKan1234
Joined: 27 Aug 2022
Last visit: 23 Dec 2024
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 147
Posts: 66
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
abcsayali
Governor: After several years of large gains, our state’s housing market is posting smaller gains this year. Other areas of our economy grew slightly this year, but no more than in recent years. Thus, given these sources of tax revenue, this year’s overall tax revenue is likely to be higher than last year’s. Nevertheless, I am pessimistic about our ability to meet the financial obligations detailed in this year’s budget.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the governor’s pessimism?

A. Several items in the state’s budget for this year are required by law to be funded from sources other than tax revenue collected by the state.

B. The financial obligations in this year’s budget are greater than the obligations in any previous year’s budget.

C. Tax revenues associated with housing, such as property sales taxes and construction industry income taxes, will be higher this year than they were last year.

D. Fewer new housing-related jobs were created in the state this year than last year.

E. This year’s state budget is based on the assumption that tax revenue will grow at no less than the same rate as it has in recent years.

­­
­B cannot explain the pessimism. After all, this year's revenue is likely to be higher even if the state faces greater financial obligations.

 
avatar
bronaugust
Joined: 06 Jun 2024
Last visit: 29 Aug 2024
Posts: 234
Own Kudos:
290
 [1]
Given Kudos: 33
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 234
Kudos: 290
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
To solve this question, let us deploy IMS's four-step technique.

STEP #1 -> IDENTIFY THE QUESTION TYPE

Let us read the question stem to identify the question type. ­
Quote:
Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the governor’s pessimism?
The stem indicates a resolve/explain the paradox question.

STEP #2 -> X-RAY THE PASSAGE

In a resolve the paradox question, it is a must to x-ray the passage and figure out the paradox. Let us therefore go through the passage.
Quote:
Governor: After several years of large gains, our state’s housing market is posting smaller gains this year. Other areas of our economy grew slightly this year, but no more than in recent years. Thus, given these sources of tax revenue, this year’s overall tax revenue is likely to be higher than last year’s. Nevertheless, I am pessimistic about our ability to meet the financial obligations detailed in this year’s budget.
FACT#1 -> State’s housing market is posting smaller gains this year after several years of large gains.
INFERENCE: The housing market is posting gains this year, but these gains are not as substantial as those witnessed the past several years.

FACT #2 -> Other areas of our economy grew slightly this year, but no more than in recent years.
INFERENCE: Areas other than housing market grew slightly, but the growth was not more than (was less than or equal to) the growth observed in recent years.

PARADOX: While this year’s overall tax revenue is likely to be higher than last year’s, the governor is pessimistic about the state's ability to meet the financial obligations detailed in the year’s budget.

STEP #3 -> FRAME A SHADOW ANSWER

To frame a shadow answer, we need to know what the correct answer must do. In this question, the correct answer must explain why the governor is pessimistic about the state's ability to meet the financial obligations detailed in the year’s budget despite the fact that this year’s overall tax revenue is likely to be higher than last year’s.

SHADOW ANSWER: Any situation that helps explain the pessimism of the governor, giving us a reason to believe that there will actually be difficulty in meeting the financial obligations detailed in this year’s budget.

STEP #4 -> ELIMINATE INCORRECT ANSWERS

Options that do not match the shadow answer can be eliminated.

A. Several items in the state’s budget for this year are required by law to be funded from sources other than tax revenue collected by the state. - NOT A MATCH - What is required by law is irrelevant and does not explain the governor's pessimism. For one, we do not know if the prescribed law will be abided by. And second, we do not have a reason to believe that there will be difficulty in garnering funds from sources other than tax revenue. Also, this option specifically mentions 'several items in the state's budget'. We do not know what these items are. Perhaps, the law could well work in the government's favor. - ELIMINATE

B. The financial obligations in this year’s budget are greater than the obligations in any previous year’s budget. - NOT A MATCH - The comparison between this year's financial obligations with previous years looks appealing at first, but at closer introspection, it does not help explain the paradox. What we are looking for is a reason to believe that there will actually be DIFFICULTY in meeting the financial obligations detailed in THIS YEAR'S budget. Just because the financial obligations are greater this year than any year before does not mean there will be difficulty; remember, we do not have any reason to believe that the obligations are directly proportional to the growth of the economy. - ELIMINATE

C. Tax revenues associated with housing, such as property sales taxes and construction industry income taxes, will be higher this year than they were last year. - NOT A MATCH - If tax revenues associated with housing, such as property sales taxes and construction industry income taxes, will be higher this year than they were last year, the governor should be optimistic, should he not be? More important, this option complements fact #1 and does not give us what we are looking for in the right answer: a reason to believe that there will actually be difficulty in meeting the financial obligations detailed in this year’s budget. - ELIMINATE

D. Fewer new housing-related jobs were created in the state this year than last year. - NOT A MATCH - The passage does not concern itself with job creations, and even if fewer new housing-related jobs were created in the state this year than last year, we have no reason to believe that there will actually be difficulty in meeting the financial obligations detailed in this year’s budget. - ELIMINATE

E. This year’s state budget is based on the assumption that tax revenue will grow at no less than the same rate as it has in recent years. - MATCHES THE SHADOW ANSWER - We know that this year’s overall tax revenue is likely to be higher than last year’s, but this option interestingly makes a comparison with recent years (very clever indeed!). We also inferred that the housing market is posting gains this year, but these gains are not as substantial as those witnessed the past several years. Moreover, areas other than the housing market grew slightly, but the growth was not more than (was less than or equal to) the growth observed in recent years. And these "areas" (housing market + other areas) are sources of tax revenue as indicated in the last sentence of the passage. What is deductible from both the drawn inferences is that the tax revenue's growth this year would be less than the growth observed in recent years (keep in mind that this year's overall tax revenue is not yet figured). Therefore, if this year’s state budget is based on the assumption that tax revenue will grow at no less than the same rate as it has in recent years, but if the growth would be less, we have a strong reason to believe that there will actually be difficulty in meeting the financial obligations detailed in this year’s budget. The paradox is resolved. - MARK AND MOVE

Hence, (E) becomes the correct answer.­
User avatar
A_Nishith
Joined: 29 Aug 2023
Last visit: 26 Mar 2025
Posts: 314
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Products:
Posts: 314
Kudos: 144
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Scenario Recap:

->The governor expects overall tax revenue to be higher than last year.
->Despite this, the governor is pessimistic about meeting the financial obligations in this year’s budget.

Objective: Identify the reason behind the governor's pessimism.

Analyzing Each Option:
A. Several items in the state’s budget for this year are required by law to be funded from sources other than tax revenue collected by the state.

This doesn't explain the governor's pessimism regarding tax revenue; it focuses on funding sources other than tax revenue.

B. The financial obligations in this year’s budget are greater than the obligations in any previous year’s budget.

This option might suggest a reason for concern but doesn’t explain why the governor is pessimistic despite expecting higher tax revenue. The critical link between tax revenue expectations and budget obligations isn't directly addressed here.

C. Tax revenues associated with housing, such as property sales taxes and construction industry income taxes, will be higher this year than they were last year.

This suggests that housing-related tax revenue will increase, which should alleviate concerns, not explain the governor's pessimism.

D. Fewer new housing-related jobs were created in the state this year than last year.

This might hint at slower growth in one sector of the economy but doesn’t directly address the governor's overall concerns about meeting financial obligations.

E. This year’s state budget is based on the assumption that tax revenue will grow at no less than the same rate as it has in recent years.

This is key. If the budget is based on the assumption that tax revenue will grow at a specific rate, and the actual growth falls short of this assumption (which the governor might be anticipating), then the budget could be underfunded. This shortfall would explain the governor's pessimism. Even if tax revenue increases, it might not meet the expected rate of growth necessary to cover all financial obligations.

Conclusion:
Option E correctly identifies the governor's concern: the budget is predicated on a certain rate of tax revenue growth, and if that assumption is incorrect (which the governor fears), the state might not meet its financial obligations. The governor's pessimism stems from the possibility that tax revenue might not grow as much as anticipated, even if it increases compared to the previous year.

Correct Answer: E.
User avatar
Shashank59
Joined: 19 Oct 2022
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 2
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I agree with the explanation provided. However, I do not follow the relation between the first two statements "Governor: After several years of large gains, our state's housing market is posting smaller gains this year. Other areas of our
economy grew slightly this year, but no more than in recent years. Thus, given these sources of tax revenue, this year's overall tax revenue is likely to be higher than last year's.
"

The housing market's gains this year are smaller than those of the past several years, and the other sectors have not seen any change compared to the past years. So, based on this, we can infer that tax revenue will be lower this year since the housing market posted fewer gains than last year. But on the contrary, the governor states that tax revenue will be higher this year than last year. What am I missing?

I was stuck at this point and couldn't infer the governor's overall conclusion to solve the question. Any help to correct my understanding is highly appreciated
User avatar
Nikunjgarg1
Joined: 11 Sep 2024
Last visit: 30 Sep 2024
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
But then how can we be sure that the estimated taxes are same or greater . We didnt know this about how high the financial obligations are .. but in the same way we also do not know how high is the overall tax budget
8Harshitsharma
There are treacherous answer choices in this one.

The problem with choice B is that it is uncertain and doesn't clearly explain the governor's pessimism. Why? That's because we don't know how high the financial obligations were in this year's budget. If they were higher than the projected overall tax revenue then the governor's pessimism is justified. However, if the financial obligations were higher than any other year but lower than the projected tax revenue for this year then the governor won't have any reason to be pessimistic. So, this choice is not air tight.

Choice E on the other hand states that the this year's tax budget is based on the assumption that overall tax revenue will grow at the same or even greater rate this year than the previous year and since we already know that the city's housing market will have smaller gains this year. The governor and we can be certain that the obligations won't be met.­

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
anshikag22
Joined: 16 Aug 2024
Last visit: 25 Nov 2024
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 278
Posts: 16
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I have the same doubt. Any expert opinion on this would be helpful
GMATNinja MartyMurray

Shashank59
I agree with the explanation provided. However, I do not follow the relation between the first two statements "Governor: After several years of large gains, our state's housing market is posting smaller gains this year. Other areas of our
economy grew slightly this year, but no more than in recent years. Thus, given these sources of tax revenue, this year's overall tax revenue is likely to be higher than last year's.
"

The housing market's gains this year are smaller than those of the past several years, and the other sectors have not seen any change compared to the past years. So, based on this, we can infer that tax revenue will be lower this year since the housing market posted fewer gains than last year. But on the contrary, the governor states that tax revenue will be higher this year than last year. What am I missing?

I was stuck at this point and couldn't infer the governor's overall conclusion to solve the question. Any help to correct my understanding is highly appreciated
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 7,266
Own Kudos:
67,320
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,910
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,266
Kudos: 67,320
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
anshikag22
I have the same doubt. Any expert opinion on this would be helpful

GMATNinja MartyMurray

Shashank59
I agree with the explanation provided. However, I do not follow the relation between the first two statements "Governor: After several years of large gains, our state's housing market is posting smaller gains this year. Other areas of our

economy grew slightly this year, but no more than in recent years. Thus, given these sources of tax revenue, this year's overall tax revenue is likely to be higher than last year's.
"

The housing market's gains this year are smaller than those of the past several years, and the other sectors have not seen any change compared to the past years. So, based on this, we can infer that tax revenue will be lower this year since the housing market posted fewer gains than last year. But on the contrary, the governor states that tax revenue will be higher this year than last year. What am I missing?

I was stuck at this point and couldn't infer the governor's overall conclusion to solve the question. Any help to correct my understanding is highly appreciated
This portion of the post isn't accurate: "the other sectors have not seen any change compared to the past years".

Those other areas of the economy did in fact grow slightly. The level of growth was no more than in recent years, but there was still growth.

For example, perhaps in recent years, annual growth in those other areas ranged from 1-4%. In that case, this year's growth would be in that same range. But even a 1% growth rate between last year and this year means that those sources of tax revenue are LARGER this year than they were last year (even if only by a tiny percentage).

As for housing, there was growth there as well -- just a smaller percentage than in the several years before last week. For example, maybe housing growth was 12% per year for several years but only 5% this year.

Again, even a tiny growth percentage is still growth, so there's still an increase from one year to the next. And that means that there's an increase in tax revenue -- as long as there was positive growth across the board, there will be SOME positive increase in tax revenue.

I hope that helps!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7266 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
233 posts