Last visit was: 11 Jul 2025, 18:25 It is currently 11 Jul 2025, 18:25
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 09 Jul 2025
Posts: 15,828
Own Kudos:
46,368
 [20]
Given Kudos: 6,082
GPA: 3.62
Posts: 15,828
Kudos: 46,368
 [20]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
17
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
kaushikdk003
Joined: 09 May 2023
Last visit: 04 Oct 2023
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
Posts: 4
Kudos: 2
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Vandanaa
Joined: 13 Feb 2022
Last visit: 10 Jul 2025
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
27
 [1]
Given Kudos: 48
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
Schools: ISB '19
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V35
GPA: 4
Schools: ISB '19
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V35
Posts: 16
Kudos: 27
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Vandanaa
Joined: 13 Feb 2022
Last visit: 10 Jul 2025
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
27
 [2]
Given Kudos: 48
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
Schools: ISB '19
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V35
GPA: 4
Schools: ISB '19
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V35
Posts: 16
Kudos: 27
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kaushikdk003
Hello, can anyone please explain the approach for Q7 and why the answer for Q8 is not (c).

Posted from my mobile device

Q8. This is basically a weakening question.

As mentioned in question, refer line 28-33.
Conclusion of the theory : Schmandt-Besserat theorizes that the envelopes contained official records of villagers"
contributions to temple-based grain and livestock pools.


Option (B) It was customary for villagers who performed services for another person to receive in return a record of a promise of agricultural products or crafted objects as compensation.

So, If this custom was truly in practice, then we can't be so sure that the theory "envelopes contained official records of promise of agricultural products" is reliable. It could be the case that these envelops were compensation of a service and not records of villagers contribution to the temple.
User avatar
AkankshaUniyal
Joined: 02 Aug 2021
Last visit: 07 Jun 2024
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 41
Location: India
Posts: 19
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vandanaa
kaushikdk003
Hello, can anyone please explain the approach for Q7 and why the answer for Q8 is not (c).

Posted from my mobile device

Hi Kaushik,

Q7, Options (A)
(A) It could have been replaced without loss of significance by any other sign that was not already being used for something else.

Refer Line 4-7 .... the writing on them uses relatively few pictographs; instead, numerous abstract symbols are used. The sign for “sheep,” for example, is not an image of a sheep, but rather a circled cross.

Since, the sign for sheep was an abstract symbol(i.e. no obvious relation between the sign and what it represents). It could have been replaced by any other sign without loss of significance (There was no relation between the sign and the commodity anyway, so any assigned symbol would do)



Why (B) is not the answer? The sign gets its meaning in a radically different way from the way in which the cuneiform sign for "metal" gets its meaning.
since there is no obvious relation between the sign and what it represents
User avatar
Oppenheimer1945
Joined: 16 Jul 2019
Last visit: 09 Jul 2025
Posts: 795
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 223
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q90 V76 DI80
GPA: 7.81
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AkankshaUniyal
Vandanaa
kaushikdk003
Hello, can anyone please explain the approach for Q7 and why the answer for Q8 is not (c).

Posted from my mobile device

Hi Kaushik,

Q7, Options (A)
(A) It could have been replaced without loss of significance by any other sign that was not already being used for something else.

Refer Line 4-7 .... the writing on them uses relatively few pictographs; instead, numerous abstract symbols are used. The sign for “sheep,” for example, is not an image of a sheep, but rather a circled cross.

Since, the sign for sheep was an abstract symbol(i.e. no obvious relation between the sign and what it represents). It could have been replaced by any other sign without loss of significance (There was no relation between the sign and the commodity anyway, so any assigned symbol would do)



Why (B) is not the answer? The sign gets its meaning in a radically different way from the way in which the cuneiform sign for "metal" gets its meaning.
since there is no obvious relation between the sign and what it represents

KarishmaB GMATNinja, Explanation for 6,7,8 pls
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 09 Jul 2025
Posts: 15,828
Own Kudos:
46,368
 [2]
Given Kudos: 6,082
GPA: 3.62
Posts: 15,828
Kudos: 46,368
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Explanation

6. It can be inferred from the discussion of clay tokens in the second paragraph that

Difficulty Level: Hard

Explanation

The question is asking for something that is true based on the discussion of clay tokens in the second paragraph. The correct answer will be the one best supported by evidence in the passage.

A. No. This is not mentioned in the passage.

B. No. The passage does not discuss what was preferred for temple-based pools.

C. Yes. At the end of the second paragraph, the author states that after 4000 B.C., hundreds of new token forms developed including figurative forms.

D. No. The passage did not discuss the relative importance of tasks performed by token system users.

E. No. Abstraction and flexibility of later written languages is not discussed until the third paragraph.

Answer: C
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 09 Jul 2025
Posts: 15,828
Own Kudos:
46,368
 [2]
Given Kudos: 6,082
GPA: 3.62
Posts: 15,828
Kudos: 46,368
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Explanation

7. With which one of the following statements regarding the sign for "sheep" (line 6) would the author of the passage be most likely to agree?

Difficulty Level: Hard

Explanation

The question is asking for something that is true based onthe information given about the sign for “sheep” in the passage. The correct answer will be the one best supported by evidence in the passage.

A. Yes. The symbol for sheep is described an the abstract symbol of a circled cross, which does not directly relate to any characteristics of a sheep.

B. No. The symbols for sheet and metal are presented as two examples of the same practice.

C. No. The passage does not make this distinction when discussing the symbol for sheep.

D. No. The passage notes that clay tokens were often ignored by archeologists prior to Schmandt-Besserat, but it makes no such claim about the cuneiform markings.

E. No. The passage does not discuss the political life of those who use the cuneiform writing.

Answer: A
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 09 Jul 2025
Posts: 15,828
Own Kudos:
46,368
 [2]
Given Kudos: 6,082
GPA: 3.62
Posts: 15,828
Kudos: 46,368
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Explanation

8. Which one of the following, if true, would most call into question Sclunandt-Besserat's theory mentioned in lines 28-33?

Difficulty Level: Hard

Explanation

The question is asking for a piece of information that would weaken Schmandt-Besserat’s theory in the second paragraph. Schmandt-Besserat’s theory is that the marked clay envelopes contained official records of villagers’ contributions of temple-based grain and livestock pools. The correct answer will make it less likely that the clay envelopes indicate such contributions.

A. No. This would not weaken the theory. Variety in styles of envelopes could indicate variety in contributions.

B. Yes. This answer suggests that the envelopes could serve a purpose other than recording grain and livestock contributions to pools.

C. No. Schmandt-Besserat’s theory is about the clayenvelopes with tokens inside, so information about the significance of the clay tablets would not be relevant.

D. No. A lack of evidence regarding the intended use of the envelopes is not evidence against the theorized use of the envelopes.

E. No. If labor was accounted for, that would strengthen the idea that something would be used to track contributions of grain and livestock as well.

Answer: B
User avatar
tejasriCanCat
Joined: 08 Oct 2023
Last visit: 25 Nov 2023
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
why cant ques 3 be option c .in the last para its given that its evolved into an abstract written format
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 09 Jul 2025
Posts: 15,828
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,082
GPA: 3.62
Posts: 15,828
Kudos: 46,368
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tejasriCanCat
why cant ques 3 be option c .in the last para its given that its evolved into an abstract written format

(C) is incorrect because the passage argues that the clay tokens were part of an evolution to an abstract and flexible linguistic system, not necessarily the writing on the clay tablets.
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 10 Jul 2025
Posts: 2,945
Own Kudos:
8,386
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 2,945
Kudos: 8,386
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yeah, to be specific, the writing on those clay tablets WAS the more abstract system that evolved. If you look back at the beginning, it says that the clay tablets were from around 3000, and that they feature abstract symbols. The later paragraph shows how the use of tokens led to this more flexible system. Sure, system may have continued to evolve, but by 3000 it had already existed for a while, and we don't have enough information here to say what came next.

Sajjad1994
tejasriCanCat
why cant ques 3 be option c .in the last para its given that its evolved into an abstract written format

(C) is incorrect because the passage argues that the clay tokens were part of an evolution to an abstract and flexible linguistic system, not necessarily the writing on the clay tablets.
User avatar
Raman109
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Last visit: 16 Jun 2025
Posts: 811
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Products:
Posts: 811
Kudos: 142
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­1. Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?

(A) Based on her analysis of inscription-bearing clay envelopes containing tokens dating to roughly 4000 B.C.. Schmandt-Besserat concludes that this system of tokens eventually evolved into an abstract written language. - Ok. 
(B) The discovery of clay tablets bearing inscriptions representing the tokens they contain confirms the belief of Schmandt-Besserat that these tokens served to designate the products given by villagers to their temples. - No, she theorized this. 
(C) Inscription-bearing clay envelopes containing tokens discovered in modem Iraq have provided Schmandt-Besserat with the evidence required to resolve the puzzlement of archaeologists over the sudden appearance of sophisticated crafts. - Yes. But it's limited in scope. That is not the main point. 
(D) The inscriptions found on clay envelopes containing small clay tokens have enabled Schmandt-Besserat to formulate a more detailed picture of the way in which a simple system of three-dimensional nouns evolved into modem languages. - Modern languages are out of scope. 
(E) The discovery of inscription-bearing clay envelopes containing small tokens confirms Schmandt-Besscrat's hypothesis that a language becomes increasingly abstract as the arts and crafts of the people who use the language become more abstract. - "language becomes increasingly abstract as the arts and crafts of the people who use the language become more abstract" is out of scope. 
User avatar
Raman109
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Last visit: 16 Jun 2025
Posts: 811
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Products:
Posts: 811
Kudos: 142
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­7. With which one of the following statements regarding the sign for "sheep" (line 6) would the author of the passage be most likely to agree?

(A) It could have been replaced without loss of significance by any other sign that was not already being used for something else. Yes, because these signs were abstract (theoretical) and did not coincide in any direct way with the thing they represented. 

(B) The sign gets its meaning in a radically different way from the way in which the cuneiform sign for "metal" gets its meaning. - both sheep and metal represent the same abstract signs. "crescent with five lines" is not typically a metal symbol. 

(C) The way in which it represents its meaning resulted from the fact that sheep are an agricultural commodity rather than a product of human industry. - out of scope. 

(D) The way in which it represents its meaning was not the subject of scientific scrutiny prior to that given it by Schmandt-Besserat. - We don't know. Not mentioned in the passage. 

(E) The abstract nature of the sign reveals a great deal about the political life of the people who used the language expressed by cuneiform writing. - political life is out of scope. 
User avatar
Nidhibatra
Joined: 23 Jun 2022
Last visit: 10 Jun 2024
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 230
Posts: 24
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
could someone provide detailed explanation of this RC along with detailed solution of q5 and q8
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 09 Jul 2025
Posts: 15,828
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,082
GPA: 3.62
Posts: 15,828
Kudos: 46,368
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Nidhibatra
could someone provide detailed explanation of this RC along with detailed solution of q5 and q8
­
Explanation

­
5. By characterizing certain cuneiform inscriptions on the clay tablets found in Uruk as "abstract" (line 10) the author most likely means that

Explanation


The question is asking what the author suggests by characterizing the cuneiform inscriptions in Uruk as abstract. The author sets up a contrast by stating that the writing uses relatively few pictographs. The correct answer will be the one best supported by evidence in the passage.

A. No. The passage doesn’t argue that the meaning of the inscriptions was hard to decipher.

B. No. The examples given are symbols for sheep and metal, which are tangible concepts.

C. Yes. The passage states that the symbols were not pictographs and gives the example of a circled cross to represent a sheep.

D. No. The examples given are symbols for sheet and metal, which are specific things.

E. No. There is no mention of ceremonial use.

Answer: C­

Explanation of question #8 is posted here­
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,437
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,437
Kudos: 953
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7349 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
15828 posts