Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 16:38 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 16:38
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
GMATD11
Joined: 10 Nov 2010
Last visit: 25 Sep 2012
Posts: 128
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT 1: 520 Q42 V19
GMAT 2: 540 Q44 V21
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT 2: 540 Q44 V21
Posts: 128
Kudos: 3,327
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,438
Own Kudos:
79,375
 [8]
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,438
Kudos: 79,375
 [8]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
fluke
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Last visit: 24 Oct 2013
Posts: 1,095
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 376
Posts: 1,095
Kudos: 5,167
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 17 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,143
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,143
Kudos: 11,267
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATD11
we can't change the inequality when we have -ve nd RHS +ve in reciprocal

I don't understand what you mean by this?

GMATD11

10) If 4/x <1/3, what is the possible range of values for x?

We need to consider 2 cases

You do need to consider 2 cases, but you only need to spend any time on one of them. We know:

4/x < 1/3

This will clearly be true if x is negative, since then the left side is negative, and the right side is positive, and negative numbers are certainly smaller than positive ones. So whenever x < 0, the inequality is true.

Now for the second case: if x > 0, we can multiply both sides by x without needing to worry about reversing the inequality:

4 < x/3
12 < x

So either x < 0, or 12 < x.
User avatar
gmat1220
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Last visit: 17 Feb 2020
Posts: 461
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 123
Status:Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Products:
Posts: 461
Kudos: 1,015
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Brilliant !

And when I know the sign of x > 0 then taking the reciprocal of left hand side Vs the right hand side will reverse the direction of the inequality

4/x < 1/3 and x > 0
or x/4 > 3 (reverse the direction)
or x > 12
User avatar
vinodmallapu
Joined: 06 May 2011
Last visit: 14 Dec 2011
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Posts: 8
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATD11
10) If 4/x <1/3, what is the possible range of values for x?

4/x < 1/3 => 12/x < 1
For the fraction 12/x to be <1 ,

Scenario1 : x has to be negative.
Scenario2 : The denominator should be greater than 12

=> x < 0 or x > 12 .

Please correct me if i am wrong.
User avatar
harshvinayak
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Last visit: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
74
 [1]
Given Kudos: 27
Status::O
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V35
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V35
Posts: 42
Kudos: 74
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If \(\frac{4}{x} <\frac{1}{3}\) , what is the possible range of values of x?

The question is from an MGMAT guide and the solution provided multiplies the inequality by x and flips the sign to arrive at the solution x < 0 or x > 12 . However the way I naturally would solve the given equation is:
\(\frac{4}{x} - \frac{1}{3} < 0\)
\(\frac{(12 - x)}{(3x)} < 0\)

Two cases:
a) \(12 - x < 0\) &\(3x > 0\) :: x > 12 & x > 0 therefore x > 12
b) \(12 - x > 0\) & \(3x < 0\) :: x < 12 & x < 0 therefore x < 12
Hence my solution: x < 12 or x > 12

Can someone kindly explain where I went wrong here?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,728
Own Kudos:
810,465
 [3]
Given Kudos: 105,800
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,728
Kudos: 810,465
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
harshvinayak
If \(\frac{4}{x} <\frac{1}{3}\) , what is the possible range of values of x?

The question is from an MGMAT guide and the solution provided multiplies the inequality by x and flips the sign to arrive at the solution x < 0 or x > 12 . However the way I naturally would solve the given equation is:
\(\frac{4}{x} - \frac{1}{3} < 0\)
\(\frac{(12 - x)}{(3x)} < 0\)

Two cases:
a) \(12 - x < 0\) &\(3x > 0\) :: x > 12 & x > 0 therefore x > 12
b) \(12 - x > 0\) & \(3x < 0\) :: x < 12 & x < 0 therefore x < 12
Hence my solution: x < 12 or x > 12

Can someone kindly explain where I went wrong here?

When we consider the case when \(12 - x > 0\) and \(3x < 0\), we have: \(x<12\)and \(x<0\), therefore \(x<0\).

Solving inequalities:
inequalities-trick-91482.html (check this one first)
x2-4x-94661.html#p731476
data-suff-inequalities-109078.html
range-for-variable-x-in-a-given-inequality-109468.html?hilit=extreme#p873535
everything-is-less-than-zero-108884.html?hilit=extreme#p868863

Hope it helps.
User avatar
EvaJager
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 31 Aug 2016
Posts: 513
Own Kudos:
2,370
 [2]
Given Kudos: 43
WE:Science (Education)
Posts: 513
Kudos: 2,370
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
harshvinayak
If \(\frac{4}{x} <\frac{1}{3}\) , what is the possible range of values of x?

The question is from an MGMAT guide and the solution provided multiplies the inequality by x and flips the sign to arrive at the solution x < 0 or x > 12 . However the way I naturally would solve the given equation is:
\(\frac{4}{x} - \frac{1}{3} < 0\)
\(\frac{(12 - x)}{(3x)} < 0\)

Two cases:
a) \(12 - x < 0\) &\(3x > 0\) :: x > 12 & x > 0 therefore x > 12
b) \(12 - x > 0\) & \(3x < 0\) :: x < 12 & x < 0 therefore x < 12
Hence my solution: x < 12 or x > 12

Can someone kindly explain where I went wrong here?

Another way to solve this type of inequality:

From \(\frac{4}{x}<\frac{1}{3}\) it follows that \(x\neq0\), therefore we can multiply both sides by \(3x^2\), which is positive.
We obtain \(12x<x^2\) or \(x^2-12x>0.\)
Now, imagine the graph of the quadratic function, \(y=12x^2-x\), which is an upward parabola. See the attached drawing.
This parabola intercepts the X-axis at \(x=0\) and \(x=12,\) the two "arms" are above the X-axis, meaning the values of \(y\) are positive when \(x<12\) or \(x>0\), and the values of \(y\) are negative (graph under the X-axis) when \(0<x<12.\)

Hence the solution \(x<0\) or \(x>12.\)

Note: Just remember the shape of the parabola, then you can easily deduce the sign of the quadratic function \(y=x^2+bx+c.\) If the quadratic equation \(x^2+bx+c=0\) has two roots \(x_1<x_2\) then \(y<0\) (negative) between the two roots and \(y>0\) (positive) outside the roots.
Or succinctly, \(y>0\) if \(x_1<x<x_2\) and \(y>0\) if \(x<x_1\) or \(x>x_2.\)
Attachments

ParabolaUp.jpg
ParabolaUp.jpg [ 8.97 KiB | Viewed 15297 times ]

User avatar
harshvinayak
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Last visit: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 27
Status::O
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V35
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V35
Posts: 42
Kudos: 74
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ah! :shock: thanks for the clarification Bunuel. I guess staying up all night took its toll. I had to reread and reread and reread and...

finally what I did was (per the first link you suggested) ::

dumping the two cases,
\(\frac{(12-x)}{(3x)} < 0\)
\(\frac{(x-12)}{(3x)} > 0\) :idea:
roots: 12 and 0
and then I could ride the waves of + - + ...... weeeeeeeeeee.... weeeeeeeeeee... and weeeeeeeeeeee :-D

Thanks again for helping out Bunuel .. :)
User avatar
harshvinayak
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Last visit: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 27
Status::O
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V35
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V35
Posts: 42
Kudos: 74
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks EvaJager :) you guys are awesome \m/

PS: I have just started out with my prep and have a lot to learn (and ask :lol: ) in little less than 3 weeks.
avatar
mandyrhtdm
Joined: 05 Jul 2012
Last visit: 09 Mar 2013
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT Date: 09-30-2012
GPA: 3.08
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Posts: 51
Kudos: 177
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
harshvinayak
Thanks EvaJager :) you guys are awesome \m/

PS: I have just started out with my prep and have a lot to learn (and ask :lol: ) in little less than 3 weeks.



One way to understand this is that Sign of \(\frac{x-a}{x-b}\) is same as the sign of (x-a)(x-b)
and for (x-a)(x-b) always remember that it will be negative between a & b and positive outside a & b
User avatar
harshvinayak
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Last visit: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 27
Status::O
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V35
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V35
Posts: 42
Kudos: 74
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
WOW ! :shock:
Thanks Karishma, thats one awesome collection of inequalities stuff. A kudos alone wouldnt have cut it :-D
User avatar
alphabeta1234
Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Last visit: 03 Jun 2016
Posts: 105
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 28
Posts: 105
Kudos: 313
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sorry to bring back this old post. I know how to solve this problems using the methods mentioned above. But I tried solving it another way and that method gave me a weird solution. Let say you wanted to solve the problem this way:

\(\frac{4}{x} <\frac{1}{3}\)

Since x cannot be 0. Lets look at the positive/negative scenarios

If x>0, then \(12 <x\)
if x<0, then \(12 >x\) but x cannot be both negative and greater than 12. So this is a contradiction.

Hence the range is \(12 <x\).

But this is incomplete. The range of x for this inquality is \(x<0\) OR \(12 <x\). So what am I doing wrong?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,728
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,800
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,728
Kudos: 810,465
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
alphabeta1234
Sorry to bring back this old post. I know how to solve this problems using the methods mentioned above. But I tried solving it another way and that method gave me a weird solution. Let say you wanted to solve the problem this way:

\(\frac{4}{x} <\frac{1}{3}\)

Since x cannot be 0. Lets look at the positive/negative scenarios

If x>0, then \(12 <x\)
if x<0, then \(12 >x\) but x cannot be both negative and greater than 12. So this is a contradiction.

Hence the range is \(12 <x\).

But this is incomplete. The range of x for this inquality is \(x<0\) OR \(12 <x\). So what am I doing wrong?

This is a correct approach but you made a mistake in the second case.

If x<0, then 12>x (x is less than 12) --> intersection is x<0.

So, the inequality holds true for x>12 (from the first case) and x<0 (from the second case).

Hope it helps.
User avatar
NvrEvrGvUp
Joined: 11 Jan 2011
Last visit: 01 Sep 2020
Posts: 43
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
GMAT 1: 680 Q44 V39
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V40
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V40
Posts: 43
Kudos: 194
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Gotta bump this back up because I'm stuck on what should be a very simple inequalities problem.

Given: \(\frac{4}{x}\) < -\(\frac{1}{3}\), I simplified the equation to: 12 < -x by cross-multiplying

Now, we have 2 scenarios:

1. x > 0 : no sign changes in 12 < -x, so x < -12. However, since we know x > 0, this scenario is impossible.

2. x < 0 : 12 < -x should become 12 < -(-x) so wouldn't this just be 12 < x? However, given x < 0, this scenario doesn't appear possible either.

Can someone please point out the obvious? It's driving me crazy...
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,438
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,438
Kudos: 79,375
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
NvrEvrGvUp
Gotta bump this back up because I'm stuck on what should be a very simple inequalities problem.

Given: \(\frac{4}{x}\) < -\(\frac{1}{3}\), I simplified the equation to: 12 < -x by cross-multiplying

Now, we have 2 scenarios:

1. x > 0 : no sign changes in 12 < -x, so x < -12. However, since we know x > 0, this scenario is impossible.

2. x < 0 : 12 < -x should become 12 < -(-x) so wouldn't this just be 12 < x? However, given x < 0, this scenario doesn't appear possible either.

Can someone please point out the obvious? It's driving me crazy...

First of all, the actual question is \(\frac{4}{x}\) < \(\frac{1}{3}\) (there is no negative with 1/3)

Also, you know what you have to do but you probably do not understand why you have to do it. That is why you are facing problem in this question.

Given: \(\frac{4}{x}\) < -\(\frac{1}{3}\), I simplified the equation to: 12 < -x by cross-multiplying

There is a problem here. You don't cross multiply and then take cases. You take cases and then cross multiply. Why? Because you CANNOT cross multiply till you know (or assume) the sign of x. The result of the cross multiplication depends on whether x is positive or negative. So you need to take cases and then cross multiply.

Case 1: x > 0
12 < x

Case 2: x < 0
12 > x (note that the sign has flipped here because you are multiplying by a negative number)
x should be less than 12 AND less than 0 so the range in x < 0.

Hence, two cases: x > 12 or x < 0.

Also because x is negative, you cannot just multiply it by -1 to make -x = x. That is certainly not correct. -x is positive and x is negative. They are not equal if x is not 0.
User avatar
NvrEvrGvUp
Joined: 11 Jan 2011
Last visit: 01 Sep 2020
Posts: 43
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
GMAT 1: 680 Q44 V39
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V40
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V40
Posts: 43
Kudos: 194
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasPrepKarishma
NvrEvrGvUp
Gotta bump this back up because I'm stuck on what should be a very simple inequalities problem.

Given: \(\frac{4}{x}\) < -\(\frac{1}{3}\), I simplified the equation to: 12 < -x by cross-multiplying

Now, we have 2 scenarios:

1. x > 0 : no sign changes in 12 < -x, so x < -12. However, since we know x > 0, this scenario is impossible.

2. x < 0 : 12 < -x should become 12 < -(-x) so wouldn't this just be 12 < x? However, given x < 0, this scenario doesn't appear possible either.

Can someone please point out the obvious? It's driving me crazy...

First of all, the actual question is \(\frac{4}{x}\) < \(\frac{1}{3}\) (there is no negative with 1/3)

Also, you know what you have to do but you probably do not understand why you have to do it. That is why you are facing problem in this question.

Given: \(\frac{4}{x}\) < -\(\frac{1}{3}\), I simplified the equation to: 12 < -x by cross-multiplying

There is a problem here. You don't cross multiply and then take cases. You take cases and then cross multiply. Why? Because you CANNOT cross multiply till you know (or assume) the sign of x. The result of the cross multiplication depends on whether x is positive or negative. So you need to take cases and then cross multiply.

Case 1: x > 0
12 < x

Case 2: x < 0
12 > x (note that the sign has flipped here because you are multiplying by a negative number)
x should be less than 12 AND less than 0 so the range in x < 0.

Hence, two cases: x > 12 or x < 0.

Also because x is negative, you cannot just multiply it by -1 to make -x = x. That is certainly not correct. -x is positive and x is negative. They are not equal if x is not 0.

Hi Karishma,

That was my mistake. There is a problem with a negative -1/3 and one without - I didn't realize this one was referencing the one with the positive 1/3.

I'll search for the -1/3 problem and explanation.

Thanks.
User avatar
Funambulist
Joined: 03 Oct 2015
Last visit: 29 Dec 2023
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 95
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
Schools: NUS '18
GPA: 2.08
WE:Business Development (Internet and New Media)
Schools: NUS '18
Posts: 33
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
4/x < 1/3, what is the possible range of values of x??
User avatar
ENGRTOMBA2018
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Last visit: 01 Dec 2021
Posts: 2,319
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 816
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
Posts: 2,319
Kudos: 3,889
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
laveen_g
4/x < 1/3, what is the possible range of values of x??

Follow posting guidelines (link in my signatures). Post complete question and all options. Do post the official answer along with 3 tags, 1 each for source, difficulty and topic discussed.

As for this question,

You are asked for the range of values for 4/x < 1/3 ---> 4/x-1/3 < 0 ---> (12-x)/3x < 0 ---> (x-12)/x > 0 ---> for this to be true, the range is x<0 or x>12.
 1   2   
Moderators:
Math Expert
109728 posts
Tuck School Moderator
853 posts