Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 14:01 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 14:01
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,729
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,798
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,729
Kudos: 810,460
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
@p00rv@
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Last visit: 09 Feb 2017
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
208
 [1]
Given Kudos: 130
Posts: 31
Kudos: 208
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
yezz
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Last visit: 26 Apr 2022
Posts: 830
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 49
Posts: 830
Kudos: 1,686
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
@p00rv@
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Last visit: 09 Feb 2017
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 130
Posts: 31
Kudos: 208
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
@p00rv@
If 4/x < -(1/3), what is the possible range of values for x?
A. -12<x<0
B. x>-12
C. x<12
D. x<-12
E. -12<x<0



~Need Kudos to unlock GMAT Club Tests. Please help if you like the question! :-D


Abhishek009 MERGED TOPIC

@Abhishek009: The question posted by me is different from the question in this thread in the way that it contains a "negative" term and so the answers will also be different for the 2 questions albeit yes method to solve will be the same. I did check this question before posting mine, so does that mean if questions are pretty much based on similar concepts we need not post them separately? Apologies for the inconvenience if that's the case.


~Kudos are free. Be generous to spend one :-D
User avatar
@p00rv@
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Last visit: 09 Feb 2017
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 130
Posts: 31
Kudos: 208
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
yezz
@p00rv@
If 4/x < -(1/3), what is the possible range of values for x?
A. -12<x<0
B. x>-12
C. x<12
D. x<-12
E. -12<x<0


4/x<-1/3 ......multiply by -3 and reverse sign of inequality

-12/x>1 .......... reverse again 12/x < -1 , -12>x

No. that is not the OA. if you will solve it by the method explained in this thread, you will come to know the correct answer which is A.

~Kudos are free. Be generous to spend one :-D
User avatar
yezz
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Last visit: 26 Apr 2022
Posts: 830
Own Kudos:
1,686
 [1]
Given Kudos: 49
Posts: 830
Kudos: 1,686
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
@p00rv@
yezz
@p00rv@
If 4/x < -(1/3), what is the possible range of values for x?
A. -12<x<0
B. x>-12
C. x<12
D. x<-12
E. -12<x<0


4/x<-1/3 ......multiply by -3 and reverse sign of inequality

-12/x>1 .......... reverse again 12/x < -1 , -12>x

No. that is not the OA. if you will solve it by the method explained in this thread, you will come to know the correct answer which is A.

~Kudos are free. Be generous to spend one :-D

U r right another silly mistake ... I edited


Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
avatar
coolkl
Joined: 10 Jun 2016
Last visit: 06 Feb 2019
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 194
Schools: IIM-A"19
Schools: IIM-A"19
Posts: 31
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasPrepKarishma
NvrEvrGvUp
Gotta bump this back up because I'm stuck on what should be a very simple inequalities problem.

Given: \(\frac{4}{x}\) < -\(\frac{1}{3}\), I simplified the equation to: 12 < -x by cross-multiplying

Now, we have 2 scenarios:

1. x > 0 : no sign changes in 12 < -x, so x < -12. However, since we know x > 0, this scenario is impossible.

2. x < 0 : 12 < -x should become 12 < -(-x) so wouldn't this just be 12 < x? However, given x < 0, this scenario doesn't appear possible either.

Can someone please point out the obvious? It's driving me crazy...

First of all, the actual question is \(\frac{4}{x}\) < \(\frac{1}{3}\) (there is no negative with 1/3)

Also, you know what you have to do but you probably do not understand why you have to do it. That is why you are facing problem in this question.

Given: \(\frac{4}{x}\) < -\(\frac{1}{3}\), I simplified the equation to: 12 < -x by cross-multiplying

There is a problem here. You don't cross multiply and then take cases. You take cases and then cross multiply. Why? Because you CANNOT cross multiply till you know (or assume) the sign of x. The result of the cross multiplication depends on whether x is positive or negative. So you need to take cases and then cross multiply.

Case 1: x > 0
12 < x

Case 2: x < 0
12 > x (note that the sign has flipped here because you are multiplying by a negative number)
x should be less than 12 AND less than 0 so the range in x < 0.

Hence, two cases: x > 12 or x < 0.

Also because x is negative, you cannot just multiply it by -1 to make -x = x. That is certainly not correct. -x is positive and x is negative. They are not equal if x is not 0.


I still dont understand when x < -12, how can we say x < 0. Since if x = -7, -6 it is not valid for x < -12. ( I understand the other range x > 12)
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,729
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,798
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,729
Kudos: 810,460
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
coolkl
VeritasPrepKarishma
NvrEvrGvUp
Gotta bump this back up because I'm stuck on what should be a very simple inequalities problem.

Given: \(\frac{4}{x}\) < -\(\frac{1}{3}\), I simplified the equation to: 12 < -x by cross-multiplying

Now, we have 2 scenarios:

1. x > 0 : no sign changes in 12 < -x, so x < -12. However, since we know x > 0, this scenario is impossible.

2. x < 0 : 12 < -x should become 12 < -(-x) so wouldn't this just be 12 < x? However, given x < 0, this scenario doesn't appear possible either.

Can someone please point out the obvious? It's driving me crazy...

First of all, the actual question is \(\frac{4}{x}\) < \(\frac{1}{3}\) (there is no negative with 1/3)

Also, you know what you have to do but you probably do not understand why you have to do it. That is why you are facing problem in this question.

Given: \(\frac{4}{x}\) < -\(\frac{1}{3}\), I simplified the equation to: 12 < -x by cross-multiplying

There is a problem here. You don't cross multiply and then take cases. You take cases and then cross multiply. Why? Because you CANNOT cross multiply till you know (or assume) the sign of x. The result of the cross multiplication depends on whether x is positive or negative. So you need to take cases and then cross multiply.

Case 1: x > 0
12 < x

Case 2: x < 0
12 > x (note that the sign has flipped here because you are multiplying by a negative number)
x should be less than 12 AND less than 0 so the range in x < 0.

Hence, two cases: x > 12 or x < 0.

Also because x is negative, you cannot just multiply it by -1 to make -x = x. That is certainly not correct. -x is positive and x is negative. They are not equal if x is not 0.


I still dont understand when x < -12, how can we say x < 0. Since if x = -7, -6 it is not valid for x < -12. ( I understand the other range x > 12)

Because if x < -12, then for any possible x would be true to say that it's less than 0, or less than 1,000,000.
User avatar
lorenzo393
Joined: 23 Jan 2017
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 12
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I would like to share a nice approach.
4/X -> iperbole very similae to 1/x
1/3 -> streight line
so the solutions must be something all values at the left of the intersection of the graphs( on the first quadrant) to find the point just put (4/x)=1/3 x=12 ---> x<12
If you know the graph of 1/x this explanation will be very clear.
User avatar
lorenzo393
Joined: 23 Jan 2017
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 12
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I would like to share a nice approach.
4/X -> iperbole very similae to 1/x
1/3 -> streight line
so the solutions must be something all values at the left of the intersection of the graphs( on the first quadrant) to find the point just put (4/x)=1/3 x=12 ---> x<12
If you know the graph of 1/x this explanation will be very clear.
avatar
pitroncoso
Joined: 28 Jan 2017
Last visit: 16 Aug 2017
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: Chile
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.2
Products:
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
Posts: 29
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
There's a mistake in your second result:

x < 12 & x < 0 therefore x < 0 (instead of x < 12 )
User avatar
ydmuley
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 19 Mar 2014
Last visit: 01 Dec 2019
Posts: 807
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 199
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We need to consider two cases - when x is positive and when x is negative.

when x is positive - x > 12
when x is negative - x < 0


0 < x > 12
User avatar
ydmuley
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 19 Mar 2014
Last visit: 01 Dec 2019
Posts: 807
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 199
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
fluke
GMATD11
we can't change the inequality when we have -ve nd RHS +ve in reciprocal

10) If 4/x <1/3, what is the possible range of values for x?

We need to consider 2 cases

Case 1 x is +ve

x>12

Case 2 when we consider x as -ve we will have Left hand side -ve but right hand side +ve so in that case we cnt flip the inequality.
But OA is showing both x>12 nd x<12

Pls comment which condition is wrong.

thanks

4/x <1/3
12/x-1<0
(12-x)/x < 0

Means either numerator or denominators is -ve:

Case I:
If Denominator is -ve.
x<0 ------1

Numerator must be +ve
12-x > 0
-x > -12
x< 12--------------2

In equation 1 and 2, 1 is more restrictive:
x<0

Case II:
If Denominator is +ve.
x>0 ------3

Numerator must be -ve
12-x < 0
-x < -12
x > 12


In equation 3 and 4, 4 is more restrictive:
x>12

Thus;
complete Range of x:

x<0 or x>12


Long explanation - but very well explained. Good to understand the concept part. Great Job.
avatar
queensbridge
Joined: 31 Aug 2014
Last visit: 12 Apr 2022
Posts: 11
Given Kudos: 49
Posts: 11
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I have a very basic question to do with arithmetic rather than the inequality (which I understand).

Why does cross multiplying (4/x) < (1/3) = 12 < x, but simplifying it via x < (4 / 1 / 3) = x < 12 gives a different result?

I thought usually you can rearrange by taking the numerator to the other side and the inequality wouldn't flip since you are taking over a positive 4. As a basic example if you have 4/6 = 2/3, you can take the 4 to the RHS to get 6 = 4/2/3

I'm sure there's a simple explanation but I'm having a bit of a mind block. Thanks to anyone that can assist.
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,954
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,954
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
   1   2 
Moderators:
Math Expert
109729 posts
Tuck School Moderator
853 posts