Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 47037

If p, q, r, and s are consecutive integers, with p < q < r < s, is pr [#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Nov 2014, 08:26
Question Stats:
53% (02:07) correct 47% (01:33) wrong based on 224 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics



Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Jun 2013
Posts: 277

Re: If p, q, r, and s are consecutive integers, with p < q < r < s, is pr [#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Nov 2014, 12:08
Bunuel wrote: Tough and Tricky questions: Inequalities. If \(p\), \(q\), \(r\), and \(s\) are consecutive integers, with \(p \lt q \lt r \lt s\), is \(pr \lt qs\)? (1) \(pq \lt rs\) (2) \(ps \lt qr\) Kudos for a correct solution.let p=k1, q=k, r=k+1, s=k+2 now question states is pr<qs (k1)(k+1)<k(k+2) k^2  1 < k^2 + 2k or k>1/2 or the question becomes is k>1/2 st.1 pq<rs (k1)k<(k+1)((k+2) k^2 k < k^2 + 3k + 2 or 4k>2 or k>1/2 hence statement 1 alone is sufficient st.2 ps<qr actually this statement doesn't provide us any new information. because for any 4 set of consecutive integers the above inequality will always hold true. for e.g. let 4 consecutive integers be 5,4,3,2. as can be seen (5)*(2)<(4)*(3). hence statement 2 alone is not sufficient. hence answer should be A



Manager
Joined: 22 Sep 2012
Posts: 140
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

Re: If p, q, r, and s are consecutive integers, with p < q < r < s, is pr [#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Nov 2014, 21:05
For the set of consecutive integers, p,q,r,s, we have find out whether pr < qs is true Statement 1: pq < rs This statement is true if a) All the integers are positive. In that case, pr < qs is true b) When the numbers are p= 1, q= 0, r= 1, s= 2. In this case also, pr < qs is true There are not other sets of consecutive integers that fulfills the condition of pq<rs. Since, from this condition we always get pr < qs as true, this statement is sufficient.
Statement 2 : ps < qr Here are the cases: 1. p= 1, q= 0, r= 1, s= 2 ( pr < qs is true ) 2. p= 2, q= 1, r= 0, s= 1 ( pr < qs is false) 3. p= 3, q= 2, r= 1, s= 0 ( pr < qs is false) ....... Since, we get both true and false from this condition. This condition is insufficient.
Hence A) is the answer



Intern
Joined: 10 Mar 2014
Posts: 37
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GPA: 4

Re: If p, q, r, and s are consecutive integers, with p < q < r < s, is pr [#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Nov 2014, 21:27
lets have consecutive numbers be: p, p+1,p+2,p+3
now pr < qs => p(p+2) < (p+1) (p+3) => p > 3/2
Statement1: p(p+1) < (p+2) (p+3) => p> 3/2 Sufficient
Statement2: p(p+3) < (p+1) (P+2) => which eliminates all P, so we can not conclude anything.
Hence answer is A.



Manager
Joined: 21 Jan 2014
Posts: 62
WE: General Management (NonProfit and Government)

Re: If p, q, r, and s are consecutive integers, with p < q < r < s, is pr [#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Nov 2014, 04:31
Given that, p , q , r & s are consecutive integers & is pr<qs ?
SO solving pr<qs p(q+s)/2<s(p+r)/c ; since they are consecutive hence can be simplified to their mean. pq+ps<ps+sr hence, pq<rs.............A
1) pq<rs, This statement proves equation A. SUFFICIENT.
2) ps<qr There is no fruitful link with equation A.INSUFFICIENT.
Answer is A



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 47037

Re: If p, q, r, and s are consecutive integers, with p < q < r < s, is pr [#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Nov 2014, 08:50
Bunuel wrote: Tough and Tricky questions: Inequalities. If \(p\), \(q\), \(r\), and \(s\) are consecutive integers, with \(p \lt q \lt r \lt s\), is \(pr \lt qs\)? (1) \(pq \lt rs\) (2) \(ps \lt qr\) Kudos for a correct solution. Official Solution:If \(p\), \(q\), \(r\), and \(s\) are consecutive integers, with \(p \lt q \lt r \lt s\), is \(pr \lt qs\)? We can solve this problem either by algebra or by numberplugging. Let's use algebra. All four variables can be expressed in terms of just one variable, since they are consecutive integers and we know their order. If we keep \(p\) as the basic variable, then \(q = p + 1\), \(r = p + 2\), and \(s = p + 3\). Now we can rephrase the question: Is \(pr \lt qs\)? Is \(p(p + 2) \lt (p + 1)(p + 3)\)? Is \(p^2 + 2p \lt p^2 + 4p + 3\)? Is \(2p \lt 4p + 3\)? Is \(0 \lt 2p + 3\)? Is \(3 \lt 2p\)? Is \(\frac{3}{2} \lt p\)? Since \(p\) is an integer, the question is answered "yes" if \(p = 1\) or greater, and "no" if \(p = 2\) or less. Statement (1): SUFFICIENT. We rephrase the statement similarly. \(pq \lt rs\) \(p(p + 1) \lt (p + 2)(p + 3)\) \(p^2 + p \lt p^2 + 5p + 6\) \(0 \lt 4p + 6\) \(0 \lt 2p + 3\) \(\frac{3}{2} \lt p\) This is precisely the same condition as asked in the question. Thus, we can answer the question definitively. Statement (2): INSUFFICIENT. Again, we rephrase the statement similarly. \(ps \lt qr\) \(p(p + 3) \lt (p + 1)(p + 2)\) \(p^2 + 3p \lt p^2 + 3p + 2\) \(0 \lt 2\) Since 0 is always less than 2, no matter the value of \(p\), the statement is always true. Thus, we do not gain any information that would help us answer the question. Answer: A.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2726
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)

Re: If p, q, r, and s are consecutive integers, with p < q < r < s, is pr [#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Nov 2016, 06:51
Bunuel wrote: Tough and Tricky questions: Inequalities. If \(p\), \(q\), \(r\), and \(s\) are consecutive integers, with \(p \lt q \lt r \lt s\), is \(pr \lt qs\)? (1) \(pq \lt rs\) (2) \(ps \lt qr\) Kudos for a correct solution.picked A...didn't think that much.. if the consecutive numbers start with negative values and reach positive values, then we can't know for sure anything... 1. clearly states that all the numbers are positive  sufficient. 2. not much offered. A



Intern
Joined: 10 Aug 2017
Posts: 18

Re: If p, q, r, and s are consecutive integers, with p < q < r < s, is pr [#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Sep 2017, 10:17
I have a question about how to approach it at an actual exam.
The above explanations are very mathematical and accurate, but I don't think I will have time to really think it through like that.
My method of getting through this problem was 1. noticing that they could be negative or positive (all or in part) 2. plug in two sets of numbers to explore sufficiency of each option.
Am I putting myself at a risk of missing something crucial by plugging it in?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 6219

Re: If p, q, r, and s are consecutive integers, with p < q < r < s, is pr [#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Sep 2017, 10:34
HappyQuakka wrote: I have a question about how to approach it at an actual exam.
The above explanations are very mathematical and accurate, but I don't think I will have time to really think it through like that.
My method of getting through this problem was 1. noticing that they could be negative or positive (all or in part) 2. plug in two sets of numbers to explore sufficiency of each option.
Am I putting myself at a risk of missing something crucial by plugging it in? Hi.. for saving time, one should exactly do the way you have mentioned... the MAIN point of these Q where consecutive integers are involved is they could be positive or negative and plugging 23 sets of number should tell you.. the center TWo would always be greater than product of !st and 4th, so statement II would not tell us whether the numbers are positive or negative.. a set of number in each positive integers and negative integers would tell you that statement I will give you a clearcut answer. Having said that, it is not always that such method will work. If these were not given as consecutive integers, there would have been many options possible. there may have been some other info then in statements to get to your answer
_________________
1) Absolute modulus : http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolutemodulusabetterunderstanding210849.html#p1622372 2)Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html 3) effects of arithmetic operations : https://gmatclub.com/forum/effectsofarithmeticoperationsonfractions269413.html
GMAT online Tutor




Re: If p, q, r, and s are consecutive integers, with p < q < r < s, is pr
[#permalink]
05 Sep 2017, 10:34






