If that insect is a bee, it can only sting once. It only did sting once. So it is a bee.
Type- similar reasoning
The argument is flawed. Just because the bee did sting only once doesn't prove that it can only sting once. Maybe it could sting again and just hasn't gotten around to it yet?
Also, the author concluded that the sufficient condition (it's a bee) must have occurred on the grounds that the necessary condition appears to have occurred.
(A) Spring is here. It has to be, because when it is spring, I cannot stop sneezing; and I just sneezed- Correct, the necessary condition (can't stop sneezing) might be happening (we can't be sure - we only know that he sneezed, not that he can't stop), and he concludes that the sufficient condition (spring) must also have occurred.
(B) When the sky is clear, the atmospheric pressure is high. At the moment, it is clearing up, so the atmospheric pressure is bound to be high soon- incorrect, no such flaw here
(C) Old and brittle paintings are always moved with extreme care. That particular painting is never moved with extreme care. So it must not be old and brittle- incorrect
'moved with extreme care' is a necessary condition for Old and brittle paintings. Since the necessary condition is absent, so the painting must not be old and brittle.
(D) Only one more thunderstorm was needed to ruin that roof. But the roof was still fine a month later. There must not have been any thunderstorm over that month- incorrect
(E) To survive in the wild requires physical stamina like Mark’s. All the same, Mark’s fear of spiders would prevent his survival- incorrect
Answer A
jrk23
Can anyone please explain why "c" is wrong.
old and brittle--- moved with extreme care
not moved with extreme care---> not old an brittle
jrk23Hope this helps!