Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 06:26 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 06:26
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
605-655 Level|   Absolute Values|   Inequalities|               
User avatar
puneetfitness
Joined: 02 Aug 2022
Last visit: 08 Jul 2023
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 23
Posts: 40
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,993
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
puneetfitness
Joined: 02 Aug 2022
Last visit: 08 Jul 2023
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 23
Posts: 40
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,993
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
puneetfitness



karishma great that was very helpful one last question what if inequality was
x(x - 3) > 0 instead of
x(x - 3) < 0

Will it still hold true

Then look for the regions with the positive sign on your number line.

The solution will be x < 0 or x > 3
User avatar
Crater
Joined: 14 May 2023
Last visit: 26 Nov 2024
Posts: 53
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Location: India
Posts: 53
Kudos: 74
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
boomtangboy
If x ≠ 0, is |x| < 1 ?
Whether this can be deduced\(-1<x<1\)

(1) \(x^2 < 1\)

\(-1<x< 1\)

Answer to the Question is YES, hence, sufficient

(2) \(|x| < \frac{1}{x}\)

\(\frac{-1}{x}<x<\frac{1}{x}\)

This is only possible for

\(0<x< 1\)

Answer to the Question is YES, hence, sufficient

Therefore, Opt (D)
User avatar
JohnFish
Joined: 18 Jan 2023
Last visit: 25 Jan 2025
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 30
Location: Uzbekistan
GMAT 1: 500 Q44 V16 (Online)
GPA: 2.9
GMAT 1: 500 Q44 V16 (Online)
Posts: 15
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shikhar
My answer was A...
Explanation->
|x|<1 means x should be between -1 and 1.

from (1)
x2-1<0 => x between -1 and 1. sufficient

from (2)
if x +ve then same as 1 and sufficient
if x -ve then |x|=-x
-x2<1 or x2 > -1 not sufficient

so and A

Please correct me if wrong
Shikhar you have to check two sides of the absolute value. If you solve that equation in case
x>0 solution will be (0,1) interval
second case
x<0 solution is (-1,0) interval
combo is what we need
(-1,0) v (0,1)

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Kimberly77
Joined: 16 Nov 2021
Last visit: 07 Sep 2024
Posts: 435
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5,898
Location: United Kingdom
GMAT 1: 450 Q42 V34
Products:
GMAT 1: 450 Q42 V34
Posts: 435
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB
Shef08
This is what I did for statement 2:

|x|<1/x
As |x| will always be non negative, so the equation becomes:
X<1/x
Multiplying both sides by x
X^2<1
X^2-1<0 which is then to be worked out as the same way for st 1.

Experts please let me know is this method correct? Bunuel chetan2u VeritasKarishma
Please help

Posted from my mobile device

If we write |x| < 1/x as x < 1/x, then we are assuming that x is positive because |x| = x only when x >= 0.

x < 1/x
I cannot multiply both sides by x without knowing the sign of x. Here x could be positive or negative e.g.
when x = 1/2, x < 1/x
when x = -2, x < 1/x

So I won't multiply both sides by x. I take 1/x to the other side.

x - 1/x < 0

(x^2 - 1)/x < 0

So 0 < x < 1 or x < -1
But x must be positive so only 0 < x < 1 satisfies.

Now try putting |x| = -x when x is negative.


Hi KarishmaB great explanation.
One question here
(x^2 - 1)/x < 0
x^2 < 1
x<+-1
x< 1 or x < -1

Therefore not sure how is this become -1< x < 1 ?
Could you help clarify? Thanks
User avatar
Kimberly77
Joined: 16 Nov 2021
Last visit: 07 Sep 2024
Posts: 435
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5,898
Location: United Kingdom
GMAT 1: 450 Q42 V34
Products:
GMAT 1: 450 Q42 V34
Posts: 435
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
boomtangboy
If x≠0, is |x| <1?
(1) x2<1
(2) |x| < 1/x

If \(x\neq{0}\), is \(|x| <1\)?

    Is \(|x| <1\)?

    Is -\(1<x<1\) ? (\(x\neq{0}\))


(1) \(x^2<1\) --> \(-1<x<1\). Sufficient.

(2) \(|x| < \frac{1}{x}\)

Since LHS (|x|) is an absolute value, which is always non-negative, then RHS (1/x), must be positive (as \(|x| < \frac{1}{x}\)), so \(\frac{1}{x}>0\) --> \(x>0\).

Now, if \(x>0\) then \(|x|=x\) and we have: \(x<\frac{1}{x}\) --> since \(x>0\) then we can safely multiply both parts by it: \(x^2<1\) --> \(-1<x<1\), but as \(x>0\), the final range is \(0<x<1\). Sufficient.

Answer D.

Hi Bunuel, LHS (|x|) is an absolute value therefore x could be both positive and negative. So not sure why you mean |x| is always non-negative here?
RHS (1/x), if x is -2, then |x| < 1/x mean -2 < -1/2. Therefore x could be negative here.
Not sure where's my thinking going wrong? Could you help clarify? Thanks
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,993
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kimberly77
KarishmaB
Shef08
This is what I did for statement 2:

|x|<1/x
As |x| will always be non negative, so the equation becomes:
X<1/x
Multiplying both sides by x
X^2<1
X^2-1<0 which is then to be worked out as the same way for st 1.

Experts please let me know is this method correct? Bunuel chetan2u VeritasKarishma
Please help

Posted from my mobile device

If we write |x| < 1/x as x < 1/x, then we are assuming that x is positive because |x| = x only when x >= 0.

x < 1/x
I cannot multiply both sides by x without knowing the sign of x. Here x could be positive or negative e.g.
when x = 1/2, x < 1/x
when x = -2, x < 1/x

So I won't multiply both sides by x. I take 1/x to the other side.

x - 1/x < 0

(x^2 - 1)/x < 0

So 0 < x < 1 or x < -1
But x must be positive so only 0 < x < 1 satisfies.

Now try putting |x| = -x when x is negative.


Hi KarishmaB great explanation.
One question here
(x^2 - 1)/x < 0
x^2 < 1
x<+-1
x< 1 or x < -1

Therefore not sure how is this become -1< x < 1 ?
Could you help clarify? Thanks

When we have inequalities with linear factors, we plot them on the number line (search for wavy curve method) to get our range of interest.

(x^2 - 1)/x = (x + 1)(x - 1)/x

So plot -1, 0 and 1 on the number line. Since we want the negative regions, 0 < x < 1 and x < -1
Since x must be positive, the acceptable range is only 0 < x < 1

I will put up a YouTube video on this concept soon.
User avatar
Kimberly77
Joined: 16 Nov 2021
Last visit: 07 Sep 2024
Posts: 435
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5,898
Location: United Kingdom
GMAT 1: 450 Q42 V34
Products:
GMAT 1: 450 Q42 V34
Posts: 435
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks @KarishmaB...still not quite sure about the negative regions and and x must be positive here...
Looking forward to your YouTube video and thanks a bunch :please: :)
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,588
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,588
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
   1   2 
Moderators:
Math Expert
105388 posts
496 posts