Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 48097

If x ≠ 0, is xy > 0?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jun 2015, 01:58
Question Stats:
59% (00:52) correct 41% (00:44) wrong based on 177 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 6561

Re: If x ≠ 0, is xy > 0?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jun 2015, 02:08
Bunuel wrote: If x ≠ 0, is xy > 0?
(1) x > 0 (2) 1/x < y
Kudos for a correct solution. The Q asks xy>0.. which basically means :"are x and y of the same sign?" 1)statement 1 tell us that x>0.. nothing about y.. if y is +ive, then yes .. if y is ive, ans is no... insuff 2) statement two also does not give us a clear answer.. it can take both values as negative , both positive or x ive and y positive... insuff combined it gives us x >0.. by statement 2 y will be positive for positive x.... suff C
_________________
1) Absolute modulus : http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolutemodulusabetterunderstanding210849.html#p1622372 2)Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html 3) effects of arithmetic operations : https://gmatclub.com/forum/effectsofarithmeticoperationsonfractions269413.html
GMAT online Tutor



Intern
Joined: 06 Aug 2014
Posts: 18

Re: If x ≠ 0, is xy > 0?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jun 2015, 05:03
Bunuel wrote: If x ≠ 0, is xy > 0?
(1) x > 0 (2) 1/x < y
Kudos for a correct solution. 1) x >0 but Y can be > 0 or Y can be < 0 . So not sufficient. 2) Y> 1/x here Y can be +ve and X can be ve or both X and Y can be +ve . So not sufficient . Combining 1+2 Since X>0 we can multiply by X on both sides and sign of inequality will not change => 1 < XY thus XY >0 so C



Intern
Joined: 08 Mar 2014
Posts: 47
Location: United States
GMAT Date: 12302014
GPA: 3.3

Re: If x ≠ 0, is xy > 0?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Jun 2015, 04:31
Bunuel wrote: If x ≠ 0, is xy > 0?
(1) x > 0 (2) 1/x < y
Kudos for a correct solution. Hello, For xy >0 both x an y should be of the same sign either both positive or both negative. Our job is to find whether both carries same sign or opposite. Statement1 : X is positive. No information on Y, it can take both positive and negative sign hence not sufficient Statement 2 : 1/x<y . In this equation x can be positive making 1/x +ive or X can be negative making 1/x ive. Y is greater than 1/x hence it can be both positive and negative. Combining both statements are sufficient. From statement 1 we get to know that x is postive and hence 1/x is +ive which results in Y being positive. From both statements we know that both x and y are positive so xy>0. Sufficient Answer C



Manager
Status: single
Joined: 19 Jan 2015
Posts: 91
Location: India
GPA: 3.2
WE: Sales (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)

Re: If x ≠ 0, is xy > 0?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Jun 2015, 06:31
from statement 2 1/x<y y>1/x
y1/x>0
xy1/x>0
xy1>0
xy>1.
So statement 2 itself sufficient.



Intern
Joined: 08 Mar 2014
Posts: 47
Location: United States
GMAT Date: 12302014
GPA: 3.3

Re: If x ≠ 0, is xy > 0?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Jun 2015, 06:55
It's no where given x is positive. You can't simply get rid of x in the second last equation. If x is positive then you're right but if x is ive then the sign will flip. Hope I am able to articulate my point.



SVP
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Posts: 2139
Location: India
GMAT: INSIGHT
WE: Education (Education)

Re: If x ≠ 0, is xy > 0?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Jun 2015, 09:31
Bunuel wrote: If x ≠ 0, is xy > 0?
(1) x > 0 (2) 1/x < y
Kudos for a correct solution. Question : Is xy > 0?for xy to be greater than zero, both x and y must have same sign so the question can be rephrased as Question : Do x and y have same sign?Statement 1: x > 0But this doesn't provide any information of y nor does it provide any relation of x with y hence, NOT SUFFICIENTStatement 2: 1/x < yi.e. If y is Negative, x Must be negative because 1/x will be defined as less than negative value (i.e. y) and If y is Positive, x May be Positive or negative because 1/x will be defined as less than Positive value (i.e. y) e.g. x=1, y=2 OR x=1, y=2 hence, NOT SUFFICIENTCombining the two statementsx>0 and 1/x < y for x>0, 1/x MUST be Positive and Since, 1/x(positive value) is lass than y, therefore y must be a POSITIVE value as well hence, SUFFICIENTAnswer: Option
_________________
Prosper!!! GMATinsight Bhoopendra Singh and Dr.Sushma Jha email: info@GMATinsight.com I Call us : +919999687183 / 9891333772 Online OneonOne Skype based classes and Classroom Coaching in South and West Delhi http://www.GMATinsight.com/testimonials.html
22 ONLINE FREE (FULL LENGTH) GMAT CAT (PRACTICE TESTS) LINK COLLECTION



SVP
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Posts: 2139
Location: India
GMAT: INSIGHT
WE: Education (Education)

Re: If x ≠ 0, is xy > 0?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Jun 2015, 09:36
Psiva00734 wrote: from statement 2 1/x<y y>1/x
y1/x>0
xy1/x>0
xy1>0
xy>1.
So statement 2 itself sufficient. There are two highlighted steps above, The Second Highlighted step after the first highlighted step is incorrect due to the reason that sign of x is unknown so you can't multiple x on both sides and keep the sign same. Sign in the inequation after multiplying x on both sides may or may not be same depending on the sign of x being positive or negative respectively. vik09 : You are absolutely CORRECT about the point you made.
_________________
Prosper!!! GMATinsight Bhoopendra Singh and Dr.Sushma Jha email: info@GMATinsight.com I Call us : +919999687183 / 9891333772 Online OneonOne Skype based classes and Classroom Coaching in South and West Delhi http://www.GMATinsight.com/testimonials.html
22 ONLINE FREE (FULL LENGTH) GMAT CAT (PRACTICE TESTS) LINK COLLECTION



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 48097

Re: If x ≠ 0, is xy > 0?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Jun 2015, 06:24
Bunuel wrote: If x ≠ 0, is xy > 0?
(1) x > 0 (2) 1/x < y
Kudos for a correct solution. MANHATTAN GMAT OFFICIAL SOLUTION:(1) INSUFFICIENT: This tells us nothing about the sign of y. In evaluating Statement (2), you might be tempted to assume that x must be positive. After all, we just read information in Statement (1) that tells us that x is positive. Besides, it is natural to assume that a given variable will have a positive value, because positive numbers are much more intuitive than negative numbers. Instead, if we follow Principle #4, we will actively try to violate Statement (1), helping us expose the trick in this question. (2) INSUFFICIENT: If we contradict Statement (1) to consider the possibility that x is negative, we would realize that it is necessary to flip the sign of the inequality when we cross multiply. That is, if x < 0, then 1/x < y means that 1 > xy, and the answer to the question is MAYBE. (1) & (2) SUFFICIENT: If x is positive, then statement (2) says that 1 < xy (we do not flip the sign when cross multiplying). Thus, xy > 0. The correct answer is C.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Manager
Joined: 30 Apr 2013
Posts: 90

Re: If x ≠ 0, is xy > 0?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Dec 2017, 10:35
I dint get this  How combined statements are sufficient? Could someone explain by inserting values ?



Manager
Joined: 30 Apr 2013
Posts: 90

Re: If x ≠ 0, is xy > 0?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Dec 2017, 10:40
Bunuel wrote: Bunuel wrote: If x ≠ 0, is xy > 0?
(1) x > 0 (2) 1/x < y
Kudos for a correct solution. MANHATTAN GMAT OFFICIAL SOLUTION:(1) INSUFFICIENT: This tells us nothing about the sign of y. In evaluating Statement (2), you might be tempted to assume that x must be positive. After all, we just read information in Statement (1) that tells us that x is positive. Besides, it is natural to assume that a given variable will have a positive value, because positive numbers are much more intuitive than negative numbers. Instead, if we follow Principle #4, we will actively try to violate Statement (1), helping us expose the trick in this question. (2) INSUFFICIENT: If we contradict Statement (1) to consider the possibility that x is negative, we would realize that it is necessary to flip the sign of the inequality when we cross multiply. That is, if x < 0, then 1/x < y means that 1 > xy, and the answer to the question is MAYBE. (1) & (2) SUFFICIENT: If x is positive, then statement (2) says that 1 < xy (we do not flip the sign when cross multiplying). Thus, xy > 0. The correct answer is C.Hi Bunuel ? Could you please explain how could we infer 1 < xy from statement 2 ??



DS Forum Moderator
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Posts: 1343
Location: India

Re: If x ≠ 0, is xy > 0?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Dec 2017, 10:54
santro789 wrote: Bunuel wrote: Bunuel wrote: If x ≠ 0, is xy > 0?
(1) x > 0 (2) 1/x < y
Kudos for a correct solution. MANHATTAN GMAT OFFICIAL SOLUTION:(1) INSUFFICIENT: This tells us nothing about the sign of y. In evaluating Statement (2), you might be tempted to assume that x must be positive. After all, we just read information in Statement (1) that tells us that x is positive. Besides, it is natural to assume that a given variable will have a positive value, because positive numbers are much more intuitive than negative numbers. Instead, if we follow Principle #4, we will actively try to violate Statement (1), helping us expose the trick in this question. (2) INSUFFICIENT: If we contradict Statement (1) to consider the possibility that x is negative, we would realize that it is necessary to flip the sign of the inequality when we cross multiply. That is, if x < 0, then 1/x < y means that 1 > xy, and the answer to the question is MAYBE. (1) & (2) SUFFICIENT: If x is positive, then statement (2) says that 1 < xy (we do not flip the sign when cross multiplying). Thus, xy > 0. The correct answer is C.Hi Bunuel ? Could you please explain how could we infer 1 < xy from statement 2 ?? Hi We have NOT inferred 1 < xy ONLY from statement 2. This has been inferred from both statements combined, as explained in the official solution as quoted by you. See first statement tells us that x > 0. So 1/x > 0. Now, as per second statement, y > 1/x. Since 1/x is positive, and y > 1/x, so y is also positive. Both x and y are thus positive. So we can conclude that xy > 0



DS Forum Moderator
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Posts: 1343
Location: India

Re: If x ≠ 0, is xy > 0?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Dec 2017, 11:02
santro789 wrote: I dint get this  How combined statements are sufficient? Could someone explain by inserting values ? Hi I have already explained as a reply to you. But let me try using values. We know that x is not 0, and we need to know whether xy > 0 or not. Now product of xy will be positive when either both x/y are positive, or both x/y are negative. (1) x > 0 But we dont know about y so we cannot say. Assume x=1, now if y =1, xy = 1*1 which is negative. but if y =2, xy = 1*2 which is positive. (2) 1/x < y If x is positive say 2, then 1/2 < y. Since y > 1/2 it has to be positive. But if x is negative say 2, then 1/2 < y or y > 1/2. y is greater than 1/2, but it could lie between 1/2 and 0 (thus negative) or it could be 0, or it could be greater than 0 (thus positive). So we cant say whether product of xy will be positive or 0 or negative. Combining the two statements, x>0. Take any positive value of x. If x=2, then 1/x = 1/2, y > 1/2 so both x and y are positive. Take x=1/500, then 1/x = 500, y > 500 so again both x and y are positive. So product x*y will always be positive.




Re: If x ≠ 0, is xy > 0? &nbs
[#permalink]
16 Dec 2017, 11:02






