Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

The Q asks xy>0.. which basically means :"are x and y of the same sign?" 1)statement 1 tell us that x>0.. nothing about y.. if y is +ive, then yes .. if y is -ive, ans is no... insuff 2) statement two also does not give us a clear answer.. it can take both values as negative , both positive or x -ive and y positive... insuff combined it gives us x >0.. by statement 2 y will be positive for positive x.... suff C
_________________

1) x >0 but Y can be > 0 or Y can be < 0 . So not sufficient. 2) Y> 1/x here Y can be +ve and X can be -ve or both X and Y can be +ve . So not sufficient .

Combining 1+2 Since X>0 we can multiply by X on both sides and sign of inequality will not change => 1 < XY thus XY >0 so C

For xy >0 both x an y should be of the same sign either both positive or both negative. Our job is to find whether both carries same sign or opposite.

Statement1 : X is positive. No information on Y, it can take both positive and negative sign hence not sufficient Statement 2 : 1/x<y . In this equation x can be positive making 1/x +ive or X can be negative making 1/x -ive. Y is greater than 1/x hence it can be both positive and negative.

Combining both statements are sufficient. From statement 1 we get to know that x is postive and hence 1/x is +ive which results in Y being positive. From both statements we know that both x and y are positive so xy>0. Sufficient Answer C

It's no where given x is positive. You can't simply get rid of x in the second last equation. If x is positive then you're right but if x is -ive then the sign will flip. Hope I am able to articulate my point.

for xy to be greater than zero, both x and y must have same sign so the question can be rephrased as

Question : Do x and y have same sign?

Statement 1: x > 0

But this doesn't provide any information of y nor does it provide any relation of x with y

hence, NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: 1/x < y

i.e. If y is Negative, x Must be negative because 1/x will be defined as less than negative value (i.e. y) and If y is Positive, x May be Positive or negative because 1/x will be defined as less than Positive value (i.e. y) e.g. x=1, y=2 OR x=-1, y=2

hence, NOT SUFFICIENT

Combining the two statements

x>0 and 1/x < y for x>0, 1/x MUST be Positive and Since, 1/x(positive value) is lass than y, therefore y must be a POSITIVE value as well

Prosper!!! GMATinsight Bhoopendra Singh and Dr.Sushma Jha e-mail: info@GMATinsight.com I Call us : +91-9999687183 / 9891333772 Online One-on-One Skype based classes and Classroom Coaching in South and West Delhi http://www.GMATinsight.com/testimonials.html

There are two highlighted steps above, The Second Highlighted step after the first highlighted step is incorrect due to the reason that sign of x is unknown so you can't multiple x on both sides and keep the sign same.

Sign in the inequation after multiplying x on both sides may or may not be same depending on the sign of x being positive or negative respectively.

vik09 : You are absolutely CORRECT about the point you made.
_________________

Prosper!!! GMATinsight Bhoopendra Singh and Dr.Sushma Jha e-mail: info@GMATinsight.com I Call us : +91-9999687183 / 9891333772 Online One-on-One Skype based classes and Classroom Coaching in South and West Delhi http://www.GMATinsight.com/testimonials.html

(1) INSUFFICIENT: This tells us nothing about the sign of y.

In evaluating Statement (2), you might be tempted to assume that x must be positive. After all, we just read information in Statement (1) that tells us that x is positive. Besides, it is natural to assume that a given variable will have a positive value, because positive numbers are much more intuitive than negative numbers.

Instead, if we follow Principle #4, we will actively try to violate Statement (1), helping us expose the trick in this question.

(2) INSUFFICIENT: If we contradict Statement (1) to consider the possibility that x is negative, we would realize that it is necessary to flip the sign of the inequality when we cross multiply. That is, if x < 0, then 1/x < y means that 1 > xy, and the answer to the question is MAYBE.

(1) & (2) SUFFICIENT: If x is positive, then statement (2) says that 1 < xy (we do not flip the sign when cross multiplying). Thus, xy > 0.

(1) INSUFFICIENT: This tells us nothing about the sign of y.

In evaluating Statement (2), you might be tempted to assume that x must be positive. After all, we just read information in Statement (1) that tells us that x is positive. Besides, it is natural to assume that a given variable will have a positive value, because positive numbers are much more intuitive than negative numbers.

Instead, if we follow Principle #4, we will actively try to violate Statement (1), helping us expose the trick in this question.

(2) INSUFFICIENT: If we contradict Statement (1) to consider the possibility that x is negative, we would realize that it is necessary to flip the sign of the inequality when we cross multiply. That is, if x < 0, then 1/x < y means that 1 > xy, and the answer to the question is MAYBE.

(1) & (2) SUFFICIENT: If x is positive, then statement (2) says that 1 < xy (we do not flip the sign when cross multiplying). Thus, xy > 0.

The correct answer is C.

Hi Bunuel ? Could you please explain how could we infer 1 < xy from statement 2 ??

(1) INSUFFICIENT: This tells us nothing about the sign of y.

In evaluating Statement (2), you might be tempted to assume that x must be positive. After all, we just read information in Statement (1) that tells us that x is positive. Besides, it is natural to assume that a given variable will have a positive value, because positive numbers are much more intuitive than negative numbers.

Instead, if we follow Principle #4, we will actively try to violate Statement (1), helping us expose the trick in this question.

(2) INSUFFICIENT: If we contradict Statement (1) to consider the possibility that x is negative, we would realize that it is necessary to flip the sign of the inequality when we cross multiply. That is, if x < 0, then 1/x < y means that 1 > xy, and the answer to the question is MAYBE.

(1) & (2) SUFFICIENT: If x is positive, then statement (2) says that 1 < xy (we do not flip the sign when cross multiplying). Thus, xy > 0.

The correct answer is C.

Hi Bunuel ? Could you please explain how could we infer 1 < xy from statement 2 ??

Hi

We have NOT inferred 1 < xy ONLY from statement 2. This has been inferred from both statements combined, as explained in the official solution as quoted by you. See first statement tells us that x > 0. So 1/x > 0. Now, as per second statement, y > 1/x. Since 1/x is positive, and y > 1/x, so y is also positive. Both x and y are thus positive. So we can conclude that xy > 0

I dint get this - How combined statements are sufficient? Could someone explain by inserting values ?

Hi

I have already explained as a reply to you. But let me try using values. We know that x is not 0, and we need to know whether xy > 0 or not. Now product of xy will be positive when either both x/y are positive, or both x/y are negative.

(1) x > 0 But we dont know about y so we cannot say. Assume x=1, now if y =-1, xy = 1*-1 which is negative. but if y =2, xy = 1*2 which is positive.

(2) 1/x < y If x is positive say 2, then 1/2 < y. Since y > 1/2 it has to be positive. But if x is negative say -2, then -1/2 < y or y > -1/2. y is greater than -1/2, but it could lie between -1/2 and 0 (thus negative) or it could be 0, or it could be greater than 0 (thus positive). So we cant say whether product of xy will be positive or 0 or negative.

Combining the two statements, x>0. Take any positive value of x. If x=2, then 1/x = 1/2, y > 1/2 so both x and y are positive. Take x=1/500, then 1/x = 500, y > 500 so again both x and y are positive. So product x*y will always be positive.