Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 07:58 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 07:58
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 42,384
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24,107
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 42,384
Kudos: 82,115
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Neochronic
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Last visit: 05 Jul 2010
Posts: 131
Own Kudos:
68
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 131
Kudos: 68
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 42,384
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24,107
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 42,384
Kudos: 82,115
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Statement 2 :

T has 3 distinct factors.
T can be 4 ( 4,2,1) OR 9 ( 9,3,1).
W+Y+T=10W+Y for 9

SUFFICIENT.

For N=5 , T=0 and B,C,D are not different.
9115/N=0.4
Statement 1 NOT SUFFICIENT.

IMO B.

I also tried to use the value of T we got from (1) ; however it becomes complex.
We have to use 2 values of X (0.913 and 0.931) in order to check the value of N.


Could you please explain how this one is D?
User avatar
Hades
Joined: 14 May 2009
Last visit: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Schools:Stanford, Harvard, Berkeley, INSEAD
Posts: 135
Kudos: 90
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I got B/D right away, and I would have gone with D.

(1) is too difficult to do with a calculator and far too time consuming, but I'd like to see the solution.
avatar
traveller10
Joined: 17 May 2009
Last visit: 03 Jun 2009
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
Location: USA
Concentration: General
Schools:Kellogs, Wharton, Chicago
Posts: 3
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
for 1.

X = 9115/N

when we divide any integer with the same digit number with all 9s we are sure to get a recurring decimal
ex 1/9 = 0.11111111
10/99 = 0.101010101010....
100/999 = 0.100100100..
1000/9999 = 0.100010001000....

therefore for 9115/N to be recurring and also < 1, N =9999 and in that case X = 0.911591159115...... and in that case T =9, only problem this is of the form 0.TBCDTBCDTBCD and not 0.TBCDBCD and also B and C are not different since both = 1.....I give up here....somebody show the light please...... :x
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 42,384
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24,107
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 42,384
Kudos: 82,115
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Solution:

(1) X = 0.TBCDBCD
10x = T. BCDBCD ………………………….1
1000(10x) = TBCD. BCDBCD………………2
Deduct 1 from 2:
9990x = TBCD – T
x = (TBCD – T)/9990
x = 9115/9990
x = 1823/1998
x = 0.9124124124
Sufficient

(2) T should be 9, only odd with 3 distinct factors: 1, 3 and 9. Sum = 1+3+9 = 13 = 10(1)+3.
Sufficient
User avatar
Neochronic
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Last visit: 05 Jul 2010
Posts: 131
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 131
Kudos: 68
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1. x = (TBCD – T)/9990

2. x = 9115/9990

How can we deduce the second statement from 1st statement..
whats is the approach..
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 42,384
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24,107
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 42,384
Kudos: 82,115
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Neochronic
1. x = (TBCD – T)/9990

2. x = 9115/9990

How can we deduce the second statement from 1st statement..
whats is the approach..

I think the idea is that in Statement (1) that X = 9115/N where N is a whole number, but I am not sure that it works that way now that you are asking. Let me check.
User avatar
GMAT TIGER
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Last visit: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 1,013
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 19
Posts: 1,013
Kudos: 1,783
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bb
One of the GMAT Club's best came up with this question for fun. Originally it was at about 800 level but I think this version is close to 750 - would be curious to hear what you think. (I personally had not idea how to tackle it)

If X is a repeating decimal = 0.TBCDBCD, where T, B, C, and D are different integers, what is the value of T?

(1) X = 9115/N where N is a whole number
(2) T has 3 distinct factors: W, Y and T and the sum of W, Y and T is 10W+Y.

Official Answer: D
Solution:

(1) X = 0.TBCDBCD
10x = T. BCDBCD ………………………….1
1000(10x) = TBCD. BCDBCD………………2
Deduct 1 from 2:
9990x = TBCD – T
x = (TBCD – T)/9990
x = 9115/9990
x = 1823/1998
x = 0.9124124124
Sufficient

(2) T should be 9, only odd with 3 distinct factors: 1, 3 and 9. Sum = 1+3+9 = 13 = 10(1)+3.
Sufficient

bb
Neochronic
1. x = (TBCD – T)/9990

2. x = 9115/9990

How can we deduce the second statement from 1st statement..
whats is the approach..

I think the idea is that in Statement (1) that X = 9115/N where N is a whole number, but I am not sure that it works that way now that you are asking. Let me check.


IMO, 2 cannot be deduced from 1 above if x = 9115/N is not given.

Since X = 9115/N is given, x should be = 9115/9990.
"9115 is/should be (TBCD -T) as given in statement 1 and N has to be 9990 if "TBCD -T = 9115".

Can you elaborate your problem that why 2 cannot be deduced from 1 if x = 9115/N is given in detail?
User avatar
Hades
Joined: 14 May 2009
Last visit: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Schools:Stanford, Harvard, Berkeley, INSEAD
Posts: 135
Kudos: 90
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TBCD - T............. I agree with neochronic, that doesn't make any sense
avatar
mujimania
Joined: 28 Mar 2009
Last visit: 29 Aug 2009
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Good question, I got D quite quickly.

For statement 1 use the standard method to convert a recurring decimal to a fraction:

x = 0.TBCDBCD

Using x form two different numbers whose difference will eliminate the recurring digits:
10000x = TBCD.TBCD...
10x = T.BCD...

Take the second equation from the first:

9990x = TBCD - T

x = (TBCD - T)/9990

So TBCD - T = 9115 - The only possibility is T=9.

Statement 2 points to answer very quickly - only 2 single digit numbers have 3 distinct factors, 4 and 9. Easy to eliminate 4.
avatar
mujimania
Joined: 28 Mar 2009
Last visit: 29 Aug 2009
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Neochronic
1. x = (TBCD – T)/9990

2. x = 9115/9990

How can we deduce the second statement from 1st statement..
whats is the approach..

10000x - 10x = 9990x. With a recurring decimal in the form of 0.TBCDBCD... only the numerator with 9990 as the denominator will consist of the recurring digits (that's not totally correct, there are other possible denominators, but they are irrelevant to a four digit numerator). Statement 1 gives x = 9115/N
Therefore, TBCD - T = 9115 is the only possibility.
User avatar
Hades
Joined: 14 May 2009
Last visit: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Schools:Stanford, Harvard, Berkeley, INSEAD
Posts: 135
Kudos: 90
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
10000x = TBCD.TBCD...
10x = T.BCD...

Take the second equation from the first:

9990x = TBCD - T

Still doesn't make any sense. You're making a pretty big jump in logic. If you were to literally subtract T.BCD from TBCD.TBCD...
we'd get

TBC(D-T).(T-B)(B-C)(C-D).........ignoring any carrying etc........................ how that converts to TBCD - T is beyond me
avatar
mujimania
Joined: 28 Mar 2009
Last visit: 29 Aug 2009
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hades
Quote:
10000x = TBCD.TBCD...
10x = T.BCD...

Take the second equation from the first:

9990x = TBCD - T

Still doesn't make any sense. You're making a pretty big jump in logic. If you were to literally subtract T.BCD from TBCD.TBCD...
we'd get

TBC(D-T).(T-B)(B-C)(C-D).........ignoring any carrying etc........................ how that converts to TBCD - T is beyond me

It's TBCD.BCD not TBCD.TBCD. So using your method that'll give us:

TBCD - T. (T-T)(B-B)(C-C) giving us TBCD - T
User avatar
Hades
Joined: 14 May 2009
Last visit: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Schools:Stanford, Harvard, Berkeley, INSEAD
Posts: 135
Kudos: 90
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I disagree with the logic there... I guess it works

TBCD - T isn't proper mathematics
User avatar
GMAT TIGER
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Last visit: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 1,013
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 19
Posts: 1,013
Kudos: 1,783
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bb
If X is a repeating decimal = 0.TBCDBCD, where T, B, C, and D are different integers, what is the value of T?

(1) X = 9115/N where N is a whole number
(2) T has 3 distinct factors: W, Y and T and the sum of W, Y and T is 10W+Y

From 1: X = 0.TBCDBCD
multiply both side by 10 (because ine digit from the decimal is not repeating.
10x = T. BCDBCD ………………………….1
Multiply 10 by 1000 (because 3 digits right to the decimal are repeating)
1000(10x) = TBCD. BCDBCD………………2
Deduct 1 from 2:
9990x = TBCD – T
x = (TBCD – T)/9990
Since the neumarator of x is given, (TBCD-T) should be = 9115. With the given information (i.e 0.TBCD in which T is not a repeating but B, C, and D are), the neuramator of x can not be > 9115. So..

x = 9115/9990
x = 1823/1998
x = 0.9124124124
Sufficient

(2) No dispute.

Sufficient:- D.
User avatar
GMAT TIGER
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Last visit: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 1,013
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 19
Posts: 1,013
Kudos: 1,783
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mujimania
Good question, I got D quite quickly.

For statement 1 use the standard method to convert a recurring decimal to a fraction:

x = 0.TBCDBCD

Using x form two different numbers whose difference will eliminate the recurring digits:
10000x = TBCD.BCD...
10x = T.BCD...

Take the second equation from the first:

9990x = TBCD - T

x = (TBCD - T)/9990

So TBCD - T = 9115 - The only possibility is T=9.

Statement 2 points to answer very quickly - only 2 single digit numbers have 3 distinct factors, 4 and 9. Easy to eliminate 4.



Thats much clearer.
Good job.
User avatar
Hades
Joined: 14 May 2009
Last visit: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Schools:Stanford, Harvard, Berkeley, INSEAD
Posts: 135
Kudos: 90
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can anyone show a proper Mathematical proof as to why (1) is sufficient?

TBCD - T is not based in any solid Mathematical framework... You can interpret TCBD as literally T*C*B*D or 10^3*T+10^2*C+10^1*B+10^0*D - 10^0*D...

But I still have no idea in hell how it magically morphs to 9115/X....... Sorry but nobody has provided any concrete Mathematics behind it.
User avatar
Hades
Joined: 14 May 2009
Last visit: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Schools:Stanford, Harvard, Berkeley, INSEAD
Posts: 135
Kudos: 90
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
And also, what if there is another value s.t. X=9115/N is equal to .TBCDBCD..... such that T != 9?

You haven't shown that either, you're assuming there is only one answer.

[deleted an attitude comment]
 1   2   
Moderators:
Math Expert
105389 posts
GMAT Tutor
1924 posts