I'll put the Official explanation below for the benefit of all.
OE:
Logical predication; ParallelismThis sentence’s second clause, expressing what the imaging of Mercury
showed, must be linked to the first clause in a grammatically correct
way. This is best done either by an appositive relative clause (requiring
the relative marker which), or by a clause starting with a nonfinite verb
(to reveal or revealing). Also, whatever is said to be similar to a degree of
cratering (on Mercury) should also be a degree of cratering (on the
Moon); this must be expressed clearly.
A. The use of which is correct, but that of the Moon’s is inferior to that
of the Moon, because the possessive ’s and that of the redundantly
express the same idea. That of the Moon’s appears to refer,
illogically, to cratering of some unspecified thing that belongs to the
Moon, not cratering of the Moon itself.
B. To reveal is acceptable, but to the Moon incorrectly compares a
physical entity (the Moon) to a degree of cratering.
C.
Correct. Revealing is a good way to start the second clause, and to
that of the Moon properly contrasts two degrees of cratering.
D. And is incorrect as a way to introduce the second clause; to the
Moon makes the wrong sort of comparison.
E. That is not the correct way to introduce an appositive relative
clause. That is typically used restrictively, whereas the comma
preceding it makes the ensuing clause nonrestrictive. This leaves the
meaning unclear.
The correct answer is C.