nikitathegreat
Sajjad1994
shauryahanda
Hi
Sajjad1994,
For que 3, I do not see author expressing any of his own pov for Borges. He has simply stated what Borges has said and written. How can I call this complete acceptance?
Could you please share the official answer
The passage from Borges' lecture that is quoted in
Passage A is presented as a way of supporting the author's own argument about the nature of literature. Borges suggests that the participation of the reader is essential to the literary text, and the author of Passage A agrees with this view. Therefore, the author of
Passage A is expressing complete agreement with Borges' stance.
Borges’s interest in this particular
genre, of course, inspired a good deal of his own
(10) fiction, but his account also draws our attention to
an insight into the general nature of literature.
We donot know whether this is complete agreement or cautious neutrality or reluctance acceptance? The above sentence says that this account draws our attention to an insight into the general nature of literature.
GMATNinja marty Murray - Can you please help?
Thanks
There's nothing in the first passage indicating that the author is "reluctantantly" accepting Borges's view. If that were the case, we'd see some reason why the author does NOT want to accept that view, and we don't get that in the passage.
As for (C), "cautious neutrality" suggests that the author is being very careful not to take sides and to indicate that more analysis is needed. Here's something that might fit that description: "Borges's view is interesting, but we need to further examine the contexts {blah blah blah} before commenting on how appropriate or relevant that view is..."
(A) is tricky because the author never comes out and directly says, "I agree with Borges 100%!" But the author does say that "[Borges's] account also draws our attention to
an insight into the general nature of literature." The term "an insight" implies an understanding of the way things work. The author wouldn't use that word if he/she did NOT agree with Borges's view.
In other words, it's only an insight if it accurately describes reality, so the author must agree that Borges's view (and the insight stemming from it) is accurate.
This is supported by the last sentence of Passage A. Sure, the author is describing Borges's view, but the author presents that view as a statement of fact -- "here's Borges's view... it gives us this insight and shows us that what unites works belonging to the same genre is the way those works are read {...}". This sure SOUNDS like an author who agrees with Borges and wants to show the reader what we can learn from Borges's view.
If the author is in fact neutral, then he/she does NOT do a good job of playing devil's advocate against Borges's view. There's absolutely nothing in Passage A that goes against Borges's view, and there's no hint of cautiousness or reluctance. So even though (A) isn't stated directly, it's our best answer.
By the way, these two-passage RCs don't show up on the GMAT in this format, so don't worry about this one too much.
