Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 16:55 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 16:55
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
vcbabu
Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Last visit: 06 Mar 2016
Posts: 99
Own Kudos:
Posts: 99
Kudos: 350
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Hades
Joined: 14 May 2009
Last visit: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Schools:Stanford, Harvard, Berkeley, INSEAD
Posts: 135
Kudos: 90
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
waiting for Hades's explanation .
BTW whats OA?
User avatar
Hades
Joined: 14 May 2009
Last visit: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Schools:Stanford, Harvard, Berkeley, INSEAD
Posts: 135
Kudos: 90
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It's a network flow.

I set it up, very basic. I tried to solve it mentally but no dice, there is no configuration that works. Let me explain it another way

We're going to have 6 matches, so 6 wins & 6 losses. Let's try and make a case where nobody Wins 1 game & Loses 2 games. If nobody can have 3 losses nor 2 losses (from condition in (2), and from additional condition we impose), then someone can have at most 1 loss. But we need to distribute 6 losses total...so let's give everyone 1 loss, and we have 2 losses left. But where do we put those? If we put another loss onto 2 different people, we violate our own condition (no 2 losses). And if we try to stick the 2 losses onto one player, we violate the condition in (2), which states that no player can lose all 3. Hence there will always be at least 1 player who wins 1 but loses 2.

B
Attachments

flow.jpg
flow.jpg [ 21.04 KiB | Viewed 1721 times ]

User avatar
Hades
Joined: 14 May 2009
Last visit: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Schools:Stanford, Harvard, Berkeley, INSEAD
Posts: 135
Kudos: 90
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
More graphically:

We're going to have \(6\) wins and \(6\) losses.

Let's represent the players via \(A/B/C/D\).

\(L\) = loss
\(W\) = win

Condition in (2): No player can have 3 losses[/m].

Let's look at the question: [b]Can a player have 2 losses?

The YES case means a player CAN have 2 losses.

Let's see if we can make a NO case, that is no player has 2 losses. If it's impossible to make a NO case,
then the answer is always YES


So we have 6 losses: \(LLLLLL\)
& 4 players:

\(A ???\)
\(B ???\)
\(C ???\)
\(D ???\)

So since nobody can have 3 losses, or 2 losses, let's give everyone 1 loss:

\(A L??\)
\(B L??\)
\(C L??\)
\(D L??\)

We have 2 L's left. Where do we put them? If we put the 2 losses onto 1 player, we have 3 losses, which violates our condition
that no player has 3 losses. But our only other choice is to put one loss onto 2 players-- which violates our assumption for the NO
case that no player has 2 losses.

Hence the NO case is impossible.

Sufficient
User avatar
ngoctraiden1905
Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Last visit: 18 Nov 2009
Posts: 78
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 78
Kudos: 102
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
From Hade's approach, it clearly that
We have 4 people A,B,C,D and 6 games as follow:
AB
AC
AD
BC
BD
DC
See that we have total 6 Lose and 6 Win, each person play 3 games with other people.
1) If no one wills all, at most a person has 1 lose. So remains 2 lose. These 2 loses can be distributed to one A,B,C or D to make a person who has 3 all loses and each other has 1 lose 2 wins; or they can be distributed to two other people to make 2 people who have 2 loses 1 win. So insuf
2) Because no one lose all 3 games, let's distribute 6 loses into 3 people have 2 loses each; or 2 people have 2 loses each and 2 people have 1 lose each. So suf
Hence B



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
Math Expert
105390 posts
GMAT Tutor
1924 posts