The passage presents something
"unusual":
"Children who wear secondhand clothing tend to be injured accidentally MORE OFTEN."Your job: Explain WHY secondhand clothing kids specifically have more injuries.
WHY B FAILS - THE SLAM DUNK TEST
Answer B says: "Children who wear clothing that doesn't fit well are more likely to get caught on equipment."
Ask yourself: Does this explain why SECONDHAND clothing kids specifically have more injuries?
NO. Here's why:
The Fatal Flaw: B talks about poorly-fitting clothes in general. But:
- New clothes can fit poorly too
- Expensive clothes can fit poorly too
- Any kid can wear poorly-fitting clothes
B doesn't explain what's special about SECONDHAND clothing.If poorly-fitting clothes cause injuries, then ANY kid with poorly-fitting clothes should get injured more - whether the clothes are secondhand, new, expensive, or cheap.
B fails to explain the specific connection between secondhand clothing and injuries.WHY C WORKS - THE SLAM DUNK
Answer C says: "Younger children from larger families tend to get injured because they engage in rough play with older siblings."
Now trace the logic:Step 1: Passage tells us: Secondhand clothing kids → Come from LARGER FAMILIES
Step 2: C tells us: Larger families → Younger kids play roughly with OLDER SIBLINGS
Step 3: Rough play → MORE INJURIES
THE COMPLETE CHAIN:Secondhand clothing → Larger families → Rough play with siblings → More injuries
This explains EXACTLY why secondhand clothing correlates with injuries!It's not about the clothing itself - it's about what secondhand clothing indicates (larger families), and what happens in larger families (rough play with siblings).
Priyank1905
Can you please explain since the passage also doesn't talk about the rough play between older and younger siblings, So how can we say that C is the answer ?