Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 12:05 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 12:05
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
jaizen
Joined: 16 Apr 2010
Last visit: 04 Jul 2014
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
58
 [45]
Given Kudos: 3
Location: United States (AL)
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q44 V37
GPA: 3.91
WE:Information Technology (Energy)
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
36
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
vyassaptarashi
Joined: 07 Oct 2010
Last visit: 20 Jan 2018
Posts: 102
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 102
Kudos: 367
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
jaizen
Joined: 16 Apr 2010
Last visit: 04 Jul 2014
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
58
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Location: United States (AL)
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q44 V37
GPA: 3.91
WE:Information Technology (Energy)
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
nimrod
Joined: 06 Feb 2011
Last visit: 14 Sep 2012
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 21
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I can see why C is the correct answer...
The argument states that children who wear second hand clothing tend to get injured accidentally than others... Now these children can be of various age groups... thats the key point... Consider a large family of say 4 or 5 children and all the children get to wear second hand clothing.. according to the argument "All" the children tend to get injured accidentally... It is more possible that the siblings may get themselves involved in rough play, thereby injuring themselves than the possibility of injuring themselves on playground equipment... However the necessary assumption being that the older siblings will not hurt themselves by indulging themselves in playground equipment...

Nice question...
Hope that helps...
:)
avatar
jaizen
Joined: 16 Apr 2010
Last visit: 04 Jul 2014
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
58
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Location: United States (AL)
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q44 V37
GPA: 3.91
WE:Information Technology (Energy)
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nimrod
I can see why C is the correct answer...
The argument states that children who wear second hand clothing tend to get injured accidentally than others... Now these children can be of various age groups... thats the key point... Consider a large family of say 4 or 5 children and all the children get to wear second hand clothing.. according to the argument "All" the children tend to get injured accidentally... It is more possible that the siblings may get themselves involved in rough play, thereby injuring themselves than the possibility of injuring themselves on playground equipment... However the necessary assumption being that the older siblings will not hurt themselves by indulging themselves in playground equipment...

Nice question...
Hope that helps...
:)

I'm not quite sure if that is the reason why C is correct.

I figure that B is incorrect because it implies that ill fitting clothes are reduced to long sleeves and cuffs. this kind of narrows the scope of what ill fitting clothes are and indirectly implies that well fitting clothes wont have these 'features'. That is of course not correct. A well fitting dress may just as well have loose sleeves etc because that could be the design or cut.

Because of narrowing of scope, I can see why B may not be the right answer.
User avatar
fluke
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Last visit: 24 Oct 2013
Posts: 1,099
Own Kudos:
5,095
 [4]
Given Kudos: 376
Posts: 1,099
Kudos: 5,095
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jaizen
In America, children who are given secondhand clothing tend to come from households with more children. This makes sense, but what is unusual is that children who wear secondhand clothing also tend to be injured accidentally more often than children who do not wear secondhand clothing.

Which of the following statements best explains the conclusion drawn above?

(A) Children who wear secondhand clothing tend to have parents who are more concerned about their safety and well-being.
(B) Children who wear clothing that doesn't fit well are more likely to get their sleeves and cuffs caught on playground equipment and have accidents.
(C) Younger children who come from larger families tend to get injured accidentally at high rates because they tend to engage in rough play with their older siblings.
(D) The youngest child, who gets the most secondhand clothing, is also the most likely to have an accidental injury.
(E) Secondhand clothing is nearly indistinguishable from clothing bought new.

I don't know which category this question fits in as I don't see any conclusion in the passage. The two statements look more like factual statements.

If the question asks:
"Which statement, if true, would strengthen the fact that children who wear secondhand clothing tend to be injured accidentally".

Let's see the options:
(A) Children who wear secondhand clothing tend to have parents who are more concerned about their safety and well-being.
Yet, the children are getting injured. Why parents? This statement is creating a paradox and nothing else.

(B) Children who wear clothing that doesn't fit well are more likely to get their sleeves and cuffs caught on playground equipment and have accidents.
Who said the secondhand clothes won't fit?

(C) Younger children who come from larger families tend to get injured accidentally at high rates because they tend to engage in rough play with their older siblings.
This statement is just giving an answer to what the question asked. Younger children are getting injured and they also use secondhand clothing. Satisfactory relation.Correct.

(D) The youngest child, who gets the most secondhand clothing, is also the most likely to have an accidental injury.
This is another factual information which doesn't give us a reason why he/she is getting injured.

(E) Secondhand clothing is nearly indistinguishable from clothing bought new.
Thanks for the info, err, useless info!!!

Ans: "C"
avatar
jaizen
Joined: 16 Apr 2010
Last visit: 04 Jul 2014
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
58
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Location: United States (AL)
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q44 V37
GPA: 3.91
WE:Information Technology (Energy)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
fluke
jaizen
In America, children who are given secondhand clothing tend to come from households with more children. This makes sense, but what is unusual is that children who wear secondhand clothing also tend to be injured accidentally more often than children who do not wear secondhand clothing.

Which of the following statements best explains the conclusion drawn above?

(A) Children who wear secondhand clothing tend to have parents who are more concerned about their safety and well-being.
(B) Children who wear clothing that doesn't fit well are more likely to get their sleeves and cuffs caught on playground equipment and have accidents.
(C) Younger children who come from larger families tend to get injured accidentally at high rates because they tend to engage in rough play with their older siblings.
(D) The youngest child, who gets the most secondhand clothing, is also the most likely to have an accidental injury.
(E) Secondhand clothing is nearly indistinguishable from clothing bought new.

I don't know which category this question fits in as I don't see any conclusion in the passage. The two statements look more like factual statements.

If the question asks:
"Which statement, if true, would strengthen the fact that children who wear secondhand clothing tend to be injured accidentally".

Let's see the options:
(A) Children who wear secondhand clothing tend to have parents who are more concerned about their safety and well-being.
Yet, the children are getting injured. Why parents? This statement is creating a paradox and nothing else.

(B) Children who wear clothing that doesn't fit well are more likely to get their sleeves and cuffs caught on playground equipment and have accidents.
Who said the secondhand clothes won't fit?

(C) Younger children who come from larger families tend to get injured accidentally at high rates because they tend to engage in rough play with their older siblings.
This statement is just giving an answer to what the question asked. Younger children are getting injured and they also use secondhand clothing. Satisfactory relation.Correct.

(D) The youngest child, who gets the most secondhand clothing, is also the most likely to have an accidental injury.
This is another factual information which doesn't give us a reason why he/she is getting injured.

(E) Secondhand clothing is nearly indistinguishable from clothing bought new.
Thanks for the info, err, useless info!!!

Ans: "C"

Yep. B is wrong because second hand clothes neednt not fit well. Which leaves C. Thank you.
User avatar
DevilDoggNC
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Last visit: 01 Dec 2013
Posts: 133
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Schools:UNC Duke Kellogg
GPA: 3.28
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
GRE 1: Q800 V700
Posts: 133
Kudos: 234
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
C follows neatly from the stimulus.
avatar
jaizen
Joined: 16 Apr 2010
Last visit: 04 Jul 2014
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Location: United States (AL)
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q44 V37
GPA: 3.91
WE:Information Technology (Energy)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DevilDoggNC
C follows neatly from the stimulus.

dont really know what you mean by that..
User avatar
DevilDoggNC
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Last visit: 01 Dec 2013
Posts: 133
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Schools:UNC Duke Kellogg
GPA: 3.28
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
GRE 1: Q800 V700
Posts: 133
Kudos: 234
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jaizen
DevilDoggNC
C follows neatly from the stimulus.

dont really know what you mean by that..

Sorry..I was a bit vague.

What I meant was / is:

The Stimulus states: 1) Large families are more likely to use second hand clothes.
2) Children wearing second hand clothes (implying children in larger families) tend to get injured often.

So what piece of information can connect these two statements logically?

Choice C provided a proper connection between the two claims made in the stimulus.

Hope this makes it more clear.
avatar
eiffel
Joined: 13 Sep 2015
Last visit: 25 Nov 2016
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 10
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
B and C both can bet true, why B is wrong answer?
User avatar
rockthegmat007
Joined: 21 Jan 2013
Last visit: 10 Sep 2017
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 68
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
Schools: LBS
GPA: 3.82
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Products:
Schools: LBS
Posts: 33
Kudos: 32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
eiffel
B and C both can bet true, why B is wrong answer?

I'm guessing it's because B doesn't address the "large family" part? there need to be more children AND accidents that the answer choice must address, and C addresses that by linking younger siblings & elder siblings to the story.
avatar
eiffel
Joined: 13 Sep 2015
Last visit: 25 Nov 2016
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 10
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rockthegmat007
eiffel
B and C both can bet true, why B is wrong answer?

I'm guessing it's because B doesn't address the "large family" part? there need to be more children AND accidents that the answer choice must address, and C addresses that by linking younger siblings & elder siblings to the story.

Thank you
sometimes I just force my self to think like that .
avatar
jodoubt
Joined: 09 Mar 2013
Last visit: 07 Jan 2018
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.51
Products:
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V35
Posts: 11
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
eiffel
B and C both can bet true, why B is wrong answer?

Even i chose B as the answer (mainly cause in my head that was the reason i was looking for) !!
But then went back and read them , and the choices are brilliant, cause if you read carefully choice B doesn't talk about "Second hand " clothes at ALL !
choice B just talks about ill fitting clothes, but i guess most of us immediately took the implication that its the second hand clothes that are ill fitting, despite the fact that no where do they mention the second hand clothes :shock: :shock:
Very neat trick though ! Awesome q.
User avatar
uzumakinaruto444
Joined: 16 Oct 2017
Last visit: 27 Dec 2021
Posts: 49
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,136
Location: India
Schools: NUS '23
GPA: 4
Schools: NUS '23
Posts: 49
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello,

I narrowed down to B and C but I failed to understand why C is the right answer? To me, C looks as wrong as B because it does not mention anything about second-hand clothes being worn by younger children and not by older children of the family?

Can anyone please help me out? I'd be grateful.
User avatar
Sheelarani
Joined: 05 Aug 2020
Last visit: 28 Jan 2024
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 45
Posts: 9
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why B is wrong:- Passage talk about secondhand clothing but there is nothing in passage which says that secondhand clothing is not fitted or so. Option B talk about clothing which are generally loose or do not fit children but it may or may not be second hand clothing.

Why C is correct:-C is correct because it indeed provide a reason for conclusion drawn in passage regarding accident rate of children belonging to large families vs small families.
User avatar
Akshayyjain
Joined: 13 Aug 2022
Last visit: 04 Jan 2024
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Posts: 10
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nimrod
I can see why C is the correct answer...
The argument states that children who wear second hand clothing tend to get injured accidentally than others... Now these children can be of various age groups... thats the key point... Consider a large family of say 4 or 5 children and all the children get to wear second hand clothing.. according to the argument "All" the children tend to get injured accidentally... It is more possible that the siblings may get themselves involved in rough play, thereby injuring themselves than the possibility of injuring themselves on playground equipment... However the necessary assumption being that the older siblings will not hurt themselves by indulging themselves in playground equipment...

Nice question...
Hope that helps...
:)

With similar logic, children from small families also can engage in rough play with cousins or friends & get themselves equally injured ?

(Also, practically thinking it is the nature of child not environment to engage in rough or gentle play)
User avatar
Priyank1905
Joined: 05 May 2025
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 17
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The Answer Option C doesn't make any sense over here !! , Instead the answer should be B
jaizen
In America, children who are given secondhand clothing tend to come from households with more children. This makes sense, but what is unusual is that children who wear secondhand clothing also tend to be injured accidentally more often than children who do not wear secondhand clothing.

Which of the following statements best explains the conclusion drawn above?

(A) Children who wear secondhand clothing tend to have parents who are more concerned about their safety and well-being.
(B) Children who wear clothing that doesn't fit well are more likely to get their sleeves and cuffs caught on playground equipment and have accidents.
(C) Younger children who come from larger families tend to get injured accidentally at high rates because they tend to engage in rough play with their older siblings.
(D) The youngest child, who gets the most secondhand clothing, is also the most likely to have an accidental injury.
(E) Secondhand clothing is nearly indistinguishable from clothing bought new.
User avatar
Priyank1905
Joined: 05 May 2025
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 17
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can you please explain since the passage also doesn't talk about the rough play between older and younger siblings, So how can we say that C is the answer ?
Sheelarani
Why B is wrong:- Passage talk about secondhand clothing but there is nothing in passage which says that secondhand clothing is not fitted or so. Option B talk about clothing which are generally loose or do not fit children but it may or may not be second hand clothing.

Why C is correct:-C is correct because it indeed provide a reason for conclusion drawn in passage regarding accident rate of children belonging to large families vs small families.
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
32,887
 [1]
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,887
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The passage presents something "unusual":
"Children who wear secondhand clothing tend to be injured accidentally MORE OFTEN."
Your job: Explain WHY secondhand clothing kids specifically have more injuries.

WHY B FAILS - THE SLAM DUNK TEST
Answer B says: "Children who wear clothing that doesn't fit well are more likely to get caught on equipment."
Ask yourself: Does this explain why SECONDHAND clothing kids specifically have more injuries?

NO. Here's why:

The Fatal Flaw: B talks about poorly-fitting clothes in general. But:
  • New clothes can fit poorly too
  • Expensive clothes can fit poorly too
  • Any kid can wear poorly-fitting clothes

B doesn't explain what's special about SECONDHAND clothing.
If poorly-fitting clothes cause injuries, then ANY kid with poorly-fitting clothes should get injured more - whether the clothes are secondhand, new, expensive, or cheap.
B fails to explain the specific connection between secondhand clothing and injuries.

WHY C WORKS - THE SLAM DUNK

Answer C says: "Younger children from larger families tend to get injured because they engage in rough play with older siblings."

Now trace the logic:
Step 1: Passage tells us: Secondhand clothing kids → Come from LARGER FAMILIES
Step 2: C tells us: Larger families → Younger kids play roughly with OLDER SIBLINGS
Step 3: Rough play → MORE INJURIES

THE COMPLETE CHAIN:
Secondhand clothing → Larger families → Rough play with siblings → More injuries
This explains EXACTLY why secondhand clothing correlates with injuries!
It's not about the clothing itself - it's about what secondhand clothing indicates (larger families), and what happens in larger families (rough play with siblings).

Priyank1905
Can you please explain since the passage also doesn't talk about the rough play between older and younger siblings, So how can we say that C is the answer ?

Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts