Last visit was: 14 Jul 2025, 01:15 It is currently 14 Jul 2025, 01:15
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Sub 505 Level|   Weaken|                     
User avatar
fluke
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Last visit: 24 Oct 2013
Posts: 1,104
Own Kudos:
5,006
 [46]
Given Kudos: 376
Posts: 1,104
Kudos: 5,006
 [46]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
35
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
raghavakumar85
Joined: 28 May 2010
Last visit: 08 Feb 2012
Posts: 71
Own Kudos:
176
 [1]
Given Kudos: 21
Status:Prepping for the last time....
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GPA: 3.2
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
Posts: 71
Kudos: 176
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
viks4gmat
Joined: 04 Jun 2011
Last visit: 20 Apr 2013
Posts: 99
Own Kudos:
173
 [1]
Given Kudos: 21
Posts: 99
Kudos: 173
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
yogesh1984
Joined: 12 Dec 2010
Last visit: 13 Nov 2021
Posts: 176
Own Kudos:
112
 [1]
Given Kudos: 23
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
WE:Consulting (Other)
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
fluke
In comparison to the standard typewriter keyboard, the EFCO keyboard, which places the most-used keys nearest the typist’s strongest fingers, allows faster typing and results in less fatigue. Therefore, replacement of standard keyboards with the EFCO keyboard will result in an immediate reduction of typing costs.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion drawn above?

(A) People who use both standard and EFCO keyboards report greater difficulty in the transition from the EFCO keyboard to the standard keyboard than in the transition from the standard keyboard to the EFCO keyboard.

- No good, premise is not based on transition of keyboards but rather on fater typing/ less fatigue. So this choice does no good to us!

(B) EFCO keyboards are no more expensive to manufacture than are standard keyboards and require less frequent repair than do standard keyboards.

- This supports (if at all) the conclusion!, no good for us...

(C) The number of businesses and government agencies that use EFCO keyboards is increasing each year.

- Irrelevant- how does it matter to us. No good!
(D) The more training and experience an employee has had with the standard keyboard, the more costly it is to train that employee to use the EFCO keyboard.

- Hang on, it talks some bad thing about transitioning to EFCO keyboards...

(E) Novice typists can learn to use the EFCO keyboard in about the same amount of time it takes them to learn to use the standard keyboard.

- Well it's kinda neutral, does no good to weaken the conclusion!

OG10: CR-Q158

Choice D, the best answer, undermines the conclusion by pointing to a serious short-term cost of replacing standard keyboards with EFCO keyboards. The employees who are probably the most productive currently, those with the most training and experience, will cause the greatest retraining costs, according to choice D. Choice A, by contrast, suggests that the transition to the EFCO keyboard is comparatively easy, at least for typists already experienced with both types of keyboards. Choices B and E both eliminate possible sources of increased expense associated with the EFCO keyboard, namely equipment expenses (choice B) and training of new typists (choice E). Choice C, which suggest that some offices have found the switch advantageous, is consistent with there being an immediate reduction of typing costs.

The same question is also discussed in OG12, CR-Q73, Page:598(Explanation)

So only option does the required job!
avatar
Bowtie
Joined: 08 Sep 2011
Last visit: 03 May 2012
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
25
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Posts: 28
Kudos: 25
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
agree D. only one that fits the question presented
User avatar
bagdbmba
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Last visit: 10 Dec 2021
Posts: 1,005
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 156
Posts: 1,005
Kudos: 4,166
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
fluke
In comparison to the standard typewriter keyboard, the EFCO keyboard, which places the most-used keys nearest the typist’s strongest fingers, allows faster typing and results in less fatigue. Therefore, replacement of standard keyboards with the EFCO keyboard will result in an immediate reduction of typing costs.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion drawn above?

(A) People who use both standard and EFCO keyboards report greater difficulty in the transition from the EFCO keyboard to the standard keyboard than in the transition from the standard keyboard to the EFCO keyboard.
(B) EFCO keyboards are no more expensive to manufacture than are standard keyboards and require less frequent repair than do standard keyboards.
(C) The number of businesses and government agencies that use EFCO keyboards is increasing each year.
(D) The more training and experience an employee has had with the standard keyboard, the more costly it is to train that employee to use the EFCO keyboard.
(E) Novice typists can learn to use the EFCO keyboard in about the same amount of time it takes them to learn to use the standard keyboard.

Hi Verbal Experts,
Can you please let me know what's wrong with option B?
B clearly says that EFCO is either as expensive as standard keyboards or less expensive than standard keyboards...hence, it follows that there will be NO immediate reduction of typing costs. Either typing cost will remain same or will go up.So, why B is discarded?

Whereas, option D clearly says that immediate typing cost will go up. So, do we really required any evidence that must say that cost should go up.

I think, even when cost remains the same the argument is weakened.

Please clarify.
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 14 July 2025
Posts: 4,601
Own Kudos:
32,351
 [3]
Given Kudos: 687
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,601
Kudos: 32,351
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bagdbmba
fluke
In comparison to the standard typewriter keyboard, the EFCO keyboard, which places the most-used keys nearest the typist’s strongest fingers, allows faster typing and results in less fatigue. Therefore, replacement of standard keyboards with the EFCO keyboard will result in an immediate reduction of typing costs.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion drawn above?

(A) People who use both standard and EFCO keyboards report greater difficulty in the transition from the EFCO keyboard to the standard keyboard than in the transition from the standard keyboard to the EFCO keyboard.
(B) EFCO keyboards are no more expensive to manufacture than are standard keyboards and require less frequent repair than do standard keyboards.
(C) The number of businesses and government agencies that use EFCO keyboards is increasing each year.
(D) The more training and experience an employee has had with the standard keyboard, the more costly it is to train that employee to use the EFCO keyboard.
(E) Novice typists can learn to use the EFCO keyboard in about the same amount of time it takes them to learn to use the standard keyboard.

Hi Verbal Experts,
Can you please let me know what's wrong with option B?
B clearly says that EFCO is either as expensive as standard keyboards or less expensive than standard keyboards...hence, it follows that there will be NO immediate reduction of typing costs. Either typing cost will remain same or will go up.So, why B is discarded?

Whereas, option D clearly says that immediate typing cost will go up. So, do we really required any evidence that must say that cost should go up.

I think, even when cost remains the same the argument is weakened.

Please clarify.

Hi bagdmba,

Thank you for your query. Please find below my comments on your analysis that:

B clearly says that EFCO is either as expensive as standard keyboards or less expensive than standard keyboards...hence, it follows that there will be NO immediate reduction of typing costs. Either typing cost will remain same or will go up. So, why B is discarded?


My comments: First of all, choice B, if anything, is in the opposite line of thought than our job in this question. The question stem asks us to WEAKEN the conclusion that the replacement of standard keyboards with EFCO keyboards will result in immediate cost reduction. However, choice B states that EFCO keyboards require less frequent repair than do standard keyboards. This suggests that there is going to be a reduction in the operating costs of keyboards if we follow the author’s suggestion. Moving on, choice B only talks about the manufacturing costs of the two types of keyboards. We can’t conclude much about the price of a product from its manufacturing cost. At best, this information could only vaguely indicate that there is not going to be much difference between the one-time acquisition cost of an EFCO keyboard and that of a standard key-board. This understanding, combined with the lower operating costs of EFCO keyboards, goes on to show the merits of the author’s suggestion. Clearly, option B does not weaken the author’s logic in any way.

Choice D on the other hand, addresses the immediate cost reduction bit in the conclusion. It states that there are additional costs involved in going through with the replacement and these costs will have to be incurred rather immediately. Hence, it is the correct weakening choice.

Hope the above analysis helps :).


Neeti.
User avatar
him1985
Joined: 20 Jan 2014
Last visit: 12 Jul 2018
Posts: 108
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 120
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Marketing
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(D) The more training and experience an employee has had with the standard keyboard, the more costly it is to train that employee to use the EFCO keyboard.

D is clear winner here
avatar
SQUINGEL
Joined: 13 May 2015
Last visit: 17 Jan 2017
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 330 Q17 V12
GPA: 3.39
GMAT 1: 330 Q17 V12
Posts: 14
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i really dont get why D is the answer. The sentence said nothing about employees
User avatar
shashanksagar
Joined: 03 Apr 2016
Last visit: 14 Oct 2019
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 36
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V37
WE:Analyst (Computer Software)
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V37
Posts: 62
Kudos: 39
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
fluke
In comparison to the standard typewriter keyboard, the EFCO keyboard, which places the most-used keys nearest the typist’s strongest fingers, allows faster typing and results in less fatigue. Therefore, replacement of standard keyboards with the EFCO keyboard will result in an immediate reduction of typing costs.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion drawn above?

(A) People who use both standard and EFCO keyboards report greater difficulty in the transition from the EFCO keyboard to the standard keyboard than in the transition from the standard keyboard to the EFCO keyboard.
(B) EFCO keyboards are no more expensive to manufacture than are standard keyboards and require less frequent repair than do standard keyboards.
(C) The number of businesses and government agencies that use EFCO keyboards is increasing each year.
(D) The more training and experience an employee has had with the standard keyboard, the more costly it is to train that employee to use the EFCO keyboard.
(E) Novice typists can learn to use the EFCO keyboard in about the same amount of time it takes them to learn to use the standard keyboard.

OG10: CR-Q158

Choice D, the best answer, undermines the conclusion by pointing to a serious short-term cost of replacing standard keyboards with EFCO keyboards. The employees who are probably the most productive currently, those with the most training and experience, will cause the greatest retraining costs, according to choice D. Choice A, by contrast, suggests that the transition to the EFCO keyboard is comparatively easy, at least for typists already experienced with both types of keyboards. Choices B and E both eliminate possible sources of increased expense associated with the EFCO keyboard, namely equipment expenses (choice B) and training of new typists (choice E). Choice C, which suggest that some offices have found the switch advantageous, is consistent with there being an immediate reduction of typing costs.

The same question is also discussed in OG12, CR-Q73, Page:598(Explanation)

D is the only choice which weakens the argument.
User avatar
Senthil1981
Joined: 23 Apr 2015
Last visit: 14 Oct 2021
Posts: 226
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 36
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, International Business
WE:Engineering (Consulting)
Posts: 226
Kudos: 574
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(D) The more training and experience an employee has had with the standard keyboard, the more costly it is to train that employee to use the EFCO keyboard.

The conclusion is : Therefore, replacement of standard keyboards with the EFCO keyboard will result in an immediate reduction of typing costs.
So what answer choice that links the EFCO and other keyboard with respect to typing cost and also at same time, if true, would weaken the conclusion.
User avatar
anairamitch1804
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Last visit: 20 Apr 2019
Posts: 506
Own Kudos:
3,526
 [1]
Given Kudos: 877
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE:Education (Education)
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
Posts: 506
Kudos: 3,526
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion :- replacement of standard keyboards with the EFCO keyboard will result in an immediate reduction of typing costs.
Weaken :- replacement of standard keyboards with the EFCO keyboard will not result in an immediate reduction of typing costs.

Option D fits the bill :-
The more training and experience an employee has had with the standard keyboard, the more costly it is to
train that employee to use the EFCO keyboard.
User avatar
EatMyDosa
Joined: 06 Jan 2017
Last visit: 01 Dec 2022
Posts: 85
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 283
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GPA: 3.33
Products:
Posts: 85
Kudos: 109
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
egmat
bagdbmba
fluke
In comparison to the standard typewriter keyboard, the EFCO keyboard, which places the most-used keys nearest the typist’s strongest fingers, allows faster typing and results in less fatigue. Therefore, replacement of standard keyboards with the EFCO keyboard will result in an immediate reduction of typing costs.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion drawn above?

(A) People who use both standard and EFCO keyboards report greater difficulty in the transition from the EFCO keyboard to the standard keyboard than in the transition from the standard keyboard to the EFCO keyboard.
(B) EFCO keyboards are no more expensive to manufacture than are standard keyboards and require less frequent repair than do standard keyboards.
(C) The number of businesses and government agencies that use EFCO keyboards is increasing each year.
(D) The more training and experience an employee has had with the standard keyboard, the more costly it is to train that employee to use the EFCO keyboard.
(E) Novice typists can learn to use the EFCO keyboard in about the same amount of time it takes them to learn to use the standard keyboard.

Hi Verbal Experts,
Can you please let me know what's wrong with option B?
B clearly says that EFCO is either as expensive as standard keyboards or less expensive than standard keyboards...hence, it follows that there will be NO immediate reduction of typing costs. Either typing cost will remain same or will go up.So, why B is discarded?

Whereas, option D clearly says that immediate typing cost will go up. So, do we really required any evidence that must say that cost should go up.

I think, even when cost remains the same the argument is weakened.

Please clarify.

Hi bagdmba,

Thank you for your query. Please find below my comments on your analysis that:

B clearly says that EFCO is either as expensive as standard keyboards or less expensive than standard keyboards...hence, it follows that there will be NO immediate reduction of typing costs. Either typing cost will remain same or will go up. So, why B is discarded?


My comments: First of all, choice B, if anything, is in the opposite line of thought than our job in this question. The question stem asks us to WEAKEN the conclusion that the replacement of standard keyboards with EFCO keyboards will result in immediate cost reduction. However, choice B states that EFCO keyboards require less frequent repair than do standard keyboards. This suggests that there is going to be a reduction in the operating costs of keyboards if we follow the author’s suggestion. Moving on, choice B only talks about the manufacturing costs of the two types of keyboards. We can’t conclude much about the price of a product from its manufacturing cost. At best, this information could only vaguely indicate that there is not going to be much difference between the one-time acquisition cost of an EFCO keyboard and that of a standard key-board. This understanding, combined with the lower operating costs of EFCO keyboards, goes on to show the merits of the author’s suggestion. Clearly, option B does not weaken the author’s logic in any way.

Choice D on the other hand, addresses the immediate cost reduction bit in the conclusion. It states that there are additional costs involved in going through with the replacement and these costs will have to be incurred rather immediately. Hence, it is the correct weakening choice.

Hope the above analysis helps :).


Neeti.

egmat: I am not sure if I am following your reasoning entirely. The conclusion is talking about "typing costs", which according to me in real life context means cost related to remuneration paid to typists. Could you please explain how are you relating operational cost (i.e. maintenance & rapair) and manufacturing cost to typing cost?
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,441
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,441
Kudos: 953
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7349 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts