GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

 It is currently 31 May 2020, 02:18

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# In January 1992, the Sylvanic Exterminator Service of Salem

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 23 Jan 2011
Posts: 94
In January 1992, the Sylvanic Exterminator Service of Salem  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 17 Sep 2017, 21:10
2
12
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

56% (02:00) correct 44% (02:03) wrong based on 714 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In January 1992, the Sylvanic Exterminator Service of Salem County began a new service concentrating on the removal of bats, rats, and mice. Revenue increased twofold by the end of the year. However, since 1991 more people in Salem County have been taking care of their extermination problems on their own, and the extermination industry’s revenues have been dropping because of it. Sylvanic Exterminator Service has reported no such loss in revenue.

Which one of the following statements, if true, would best explain the above paradox?

A. The Sylvanic Exterminator Service was audited in 1992 and has had to be extremely careful with its bookkeeping ever since.

B. In 1990, Sylvanic upgraded all of its poison sprayers, incurring a debt which will not be paid off until 1998.

C. People would rather take care of the pest problems themselves because it is less expensive.

D. The bat, rat, and mouse populations of Salem County have increased significantly since 1991.

E. The Sylvanic Exterminator Service’s new pest service has compensated for the losses it has been experiencing in the rest of its services.

Originally posted by Chetangupta on 13 Jul 2011, 05:14.
Last edited by Mahmud6 on 17 Sep 2017, 21:10, edited 1 time in total.
Formatted
Senior Manager
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 348
Re: In January 1992, the Sylvanic Exterminator Service of Salem  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2011, 17:45
1
Clear E. Only other choice worth considering is D. However E is a clear winner as it explains the paradox.

Crick
Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2011
Posts: 187
Concentration: General Management, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools: HBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V47
Re: In January 1992, the Sylvanic Exterminator Service of Salem  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2011, 20:07
1
The Sylvanic Exterminator Service was audited in 1992 and has had to be extremely careful with its bookkeeping ever since. which means that the revenue hadnt actually doubled? But that is in contradiction with an assertion in the stem. incorrect
In 1990, Sylvanic upgraded all of its poison sprayers, incurring a debt which will not be paid off until 1998. a debt will not really have any effect on revenues. and upgrading sprayers cannot explain how Sylvanic doubled its revenues, if people have started doing extermination themselves, then it will be a big leap to assume that just because Sylvanic has upgraded sprayers, people preferef it to other exterminators/ themselves

People would rather take care of the pest problems themselves because it is less expensive. that just gives a reason for an assertion in the stem. doesnt explains why Sylvanic's revenues are still high

The bat, rat, and mouse populations of Salem County have increased significantly since 1991. that might mean the need for more extermination, especially the kind which sylvanic started as a new service. howeevr do these two factors together say that this extermination was actually done by Sylvanic only? population has increased, sylvanic starts a service to control it - but that is no guarantee that people will hire sylvanic to do it- they can still continue to do it themselves

The Sylvanic Exterminator Service’s new pest service has compensated for the losses it has been experiencing in the rest of its services.this clearly mentions that this new service got Sylvanic extra revenues as compared to others, and compensated for the loss of revenue it faced (just like the industry) in other types of extermination because people started doing it themselves. this takes care of all the conditions of the argument and still explains the paradox
Intern
Joined: 27 Dec 2007
Posts: 37
Re: In January 1992, the Sylvanic Exterminator Service of Salem  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2011, 00:17
E is the only choice available which explains why there is no revenue loss for the company.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 412
GPA: 3.4
WE: General Management (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: In January 1992, the Sylvanic Exterminator Service of Salem  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Nov 2013, 02:54
2
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2012
Posts: 314
Re: In January 1992, the Sylvanic Exterminator Service of Salem  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2014, 06:35
The problem I see here with E is that if more people do their pest control on their own, and all other companies are experiencing losses, we still don't have an explanation as how the services are still making money....
Anyone help with that?
Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2014
Posts: 177
Re: In January 1992, the Sylvanic Exterminator Service of Salem  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jun 2015, 09:41
Chetangupta wrote:
In January 1992, the Sylvanic Exterminator Service of Salem County began a new service concentrating on the removal of bats, rats, and mice. Revenue increased twofold by the end of the year. However, since 1991 more people in Salem County have been taking care of their extermination problems on their own, and the extermination industry’s revenues have been dropping because of it. Sylvanic Exterminator Service has reported no such loss in revenue.

Which one of the following statements, if true, would best explain the above paradox?

A]The Sylvanic Exterminator Service was audited in 1992 and has had to be extremely careful with its bookkeeping ever since.

B]In 1990, Sylvanic upgraded all of its poison sprayers, incurring a debt which will not be paid off until 1998.

C]People would rather take care of the pest problems themselves because it is less expensive.

D]The bat, rat, and mouse populations of Salem County have increased significantly since 1991.

E] The Sylvanic Exterminator Service’s new pest service has compensated for the losses it has been experiencing in the rest of its services.

mikemcgarry,

Intern
Joined: 17 Feb 2015
Posts: 15
WE: Sales (Consulting)
Re: In January 1992, the Sylvanic Exterminator Service of Salem  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jun 2015, 13:53
E doesn't mention anything about losses in revenue, E only talk about compensating losses. Loss in revenue vs profit and loss can be two different things, right?

Still confused. IMO D
Intern
Joined: 05 Nov 2014
Posts: 38
Re: In January 1992, the Sylvanic Exterminator Service of Salem  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jul 2015, 03:00
PathFinder007 wrote:
Chetangupta wrote:
In January 1992, the Sylvanic Exterminator Service of Salem County began a new service concentrating on the removal of bats, rats, and mice. Revenue increased twofold by the end of the year. However, since 1991 more people in Salem County have been taking care of their extermination problems on their own, and the extermination industry’s revenues have been dropping because of it. Sylvanic Exterminator Service has reported no such loss in revenue.

Which one of the following statements, if true, would best explain the above paradox?

A]The Sylvanic Exterminator Service was audited in 1992 and has had to be extremely careful with its bookkeeping ever since.

B]In 1990, Sylvanic upgraded all of its poison sprayers, incurring a debt which will not be paid off until 1998.

C]People would rather take care of the pest problems themselves because it is less expensive.

D]The bat, rat, and mouse populations of Salem County have increased significantly since 1991.

E] The Sylvanic Exterminator Service’s new pest service has compensated for the losses it has been experiencing in the rest of its services.

mikemcgarry,

A. No. Careful bookkeeping doesn't necessarily explain why they're still making money.
B. No. However effective their machinery is, they might still be losing money to the do-it-yourself crowd.
C. No. This still doesn't explain why Sylvanic kept making the same amount of money.
D. No. Close, but the argument indicates that people could be getting rid of these pests without the help of professionals.
E. Yes. Sylvanic has compensated for the potential loss of revenue by offering a different service.

Hope this helps!
Intern
Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Posts: 47
Re: In January 1992, the Sylvanic Exterminator Service of Salem  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2015, 08:03
rohitt911 wrote:
E doesn't mention anything about losses in revenue, E only talk about compensating losses. Loss in revenue vs profit and loss can be two different things, right?

Still confused. IMO D

Hi Rohit,

If D is true then all exterminator services (including Sylvanic Exterminator Service) should make money but the passage clearly states that the exterminator services
as an industry isnt doing well.The exception here is Sylvanic Exterminator Service,which means it should be doing something different from the ordinary.A different reason and
not a common reason( as explained in D) is the cause behind Sylvanic Exterminator Service success

Hope this helps
Intern
Joined: 02 Feb 2014
Posts: 4
Re: In January 1992, the Sylvanic Exterminator Service of Salem  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Apr 2016, 22:55
IMO E.

Prethink - Something that helps Slyvanic to prevent its losses.could be something to do with it's new service.

A]The Sylvanic Exterminator Service was audited in 1992 and has had to be extremely careful with its bookkeeping ever since. -- bookkeeping nothing to do with maintaining the revenue . NO

B]In 1990, Sylvanic upgraded all of its poison sprayers, incurring a debt which will not be paid off until 1998. --- debt nothing to do with maintaining the revenue . NO

C]People would rather take care of the pest problems themselves because it is less expensive. --- this hurts the argument instead. NO

D]The bat, rat, and mouse populations of Salem County have increased significantly since 1991. --- ok . population increased but whether ppl contacted Sylvanic is not mentioned. NO

E] The Sylvanic Exterminator Service’s new pest service has compensated for the losses it has been experiencing in the rest of its services. --- ok . cool so this new service is preventing the loss for Sylvanic . YES
Intern
Joined: 03 Apr 2016
Posts: 7
Re: In January 1992, the Sylvanic Exterminator Service of Salem  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Apr 2016, 05:57
In January 1992, the Sylvanic Exterminator Service of Salem County began a new service concentrating on the removal of bats, rats, and mice. Revenue increased twofold by the end of the year. However, since 1991 more people in Salem County have been taking care of their extermination problems on their own, and the extermination industry’s revenues have been dropping because of it. Sylvanic Exterminator Service has reported no such loss in revenue.

Which one of the following statements, if true, would best explain the above paradox?

A]The Sylvanic Exterminator Service was audited in 1992 and has had to be extremely careful with its bookkeeping ever since.
Doesn't explain, actually makes it even more confusing since that means their financials are perfectly fine.

B]In 1990, Sylvanic upgraded all of its poison sprayers, incurring a debt which will not be paid off until 1998.
Incurring debt has nothing to do with revenue in this case

C]People would rather take care of the pest problems themselves because it is less expensive. \
Still doesn't explain why SES has reported no loss in revenue, but does explain why the extermination industry revenues have dropped

D]The bat, rat, and mouse populations of Salem County have increased significantly since 1991.
So this explains why SES has had not decrease in revenue despite people wanting to exterminate on their own, but does NOT explain why the industry has dropped

E] The Sylvanic Exterminator Service’s new pest service has compensated for the losses it has been experiencing in the rest of its services.
This explains why SES's revenue has not decreased. It implies that SES's other service is losing money, but is counteracted by a new business service
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 9041
Re: In January 1992, the Sylvanic Exterminator Service of Salem  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2018, 01:06
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: In January 1992, the Sylvanic Exterminator Service of Salem   [#permalink] 18 Jul 2018, 01:06