Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2018
Posts: 240
Location: United States (ID)
GPA: 3.33
WE: Accounting (Accounting)

In the 2000s, the annual rate of increase in the average salary of a s
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Feb 2018, 10:01
Question Stats:
44% (00:53) correct 56% (00:57) wrong based on 419 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
In the 2000s, the annual rate of increase in the average salary of a software engineer was nearly twice as fast as the 1990s. A twice as fast as B twice as fast as it was in C twice that of D two times faster than that of E two times greater than ready4gmat
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.



Intern
Joined: 26 Sep 2017
Posts: 28

Re: In the 2000s, the annual rate of increase in the average salary of a s
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Feb 2018, 10:30
Option E The 1990s So option E will be the correct one Sent from my Redmi Note 3 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app



Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Sep 2016
Posts: 298

Re: In the 2000s, the annual rate of increase in the average salary of a s
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Feb 2018, 23:33
C A. As fast as the 1990s is wrong B. I'm not sure " fast "can be used for " rate of increase" C. Removes the ambiguity. " Of " refers to the annual rate of increase in the average salary in the 1990s D. Worst E. Than reference is incorrect I'm confused between B and C. I prefer C to B Sent from my XT1562 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app



Intern
Joined: 20 Jul 2016
Posts: 4

In the 2000s, the annual rate of increase in the average salary of a s
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Feb 2018, 21:08
Consider the rate of increase . "rate" either gets bigger or larger but not faster. "increase" gets faster. (lexical matter) So here the use of "fast"/"faster" with the "rate of increase" is wrong. Hence eliminate option A, B and D. E wrongly compares the rate of increase with the year 1990s. Correct answer is C.



Manager
Joined: 11 Jun 2015
Posts: 77
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Leadership

Re: In the 2000s, the annual rate of increase in the average salary of a s
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Mar 2018, 05:20
In the 2000s, the annual rate of increase in the average salary of a software engineer was nearly twice as fast as the 1990s.
A twice as fast as B twice as fast as it was in C twice that of D two times faster than that of E two times greater than
Can anyone please confirm if my explanation is correct :
You are comparing rate of increase of avg salary of 2000 with 1990 . The rate of increase is a value .
Rate of increase of average salary for 2000 = avg salary of 2000  avg salary 0f 1990/ avg salary 0f 1990 x 100 = 20% (Assumption)
When you are comparing values 1 & values 2
Say Value 2 = value 1 x 2 (Which means Value 2 is twice the value of Value 1 )
The value 2 cannot be 2x fast as as / greater than . It has be some percent of Value 1



Intern
Joined: 06 Dec 2016
Posts: 13
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Sustainability
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)

In the 2000s, the annual rate of increase in the average salary of a s
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Jul 2018, 09:00
I picked B because: Parallelism is maintained in this answer choice. In 2000s, the annual rate of increase...............................it was in the 1990s. Correct me if I am wrong.
_________________
War with the clock!



Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4479
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)

Re: In the 2000s, the annual rate of increase in the average salary of a s
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Jul 2018, 10:48
In the 2000s, the annual rate of increase in the average salary of a software engineer was nearly twice as fast as the 1990s. A twice as fast as B twice as fast as it was in C twice that of D two times faster than that of E two times greater than 1. We are not comparing the decades. Hence, A and E are out. 2. Unless we can call the increases as one time, two times, the phrase 'two times' is not useful. You cannot describe a quantum in countable times. Therefore, D is out. 3. The rate of increase does not have speed. We can say Tom grows faster than Dick. However, we cannot say Tom's growth rate is faster than Dick's. Therefore, B is out. C is the answer avoiding the abovesaid pitfalls. ' Generally, 'two times' is used more in informal daily conversations than 'twice' used in formal writing.
_________________
you can know a lot about something and not really understand it." a quote No one knows this better than a GMAT student does. Narendran +9198845 44509



Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2017
Posts: 222
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GPA: 4

Re: In the 2000s, the annual rate of increase in the average salary of a s
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Aug 2018, 12:24
daagh wrote: In the 2000s, the annual rate of increase in the average salary of a software engineer was nearly twice as fast as the 1990s.
A twice as fast as B twice as fast as it was in C twice that of D two times faster than that of E two times greater than
1. We are not comparing the decades. Hence, A and E are out. 2. Unless we can call the increases as one time, two times, the phrase 'two times' is not useful. You cannot describe a quantum in countable times. Therefore, D is out. 3. The rate of increase does not have speed. We can say Tom grows faster than Dick. However, we cannot say Tom's growth rate is faster than Dick's. Therefore, B is out. C is the answer avoiding the abovesaid pitfalls. ' Generally, 'two times' is used more in informal daily conversations than 'twice' used in formal writing. daagh sir I have one doubt. Wouldn't option C lead to a wrong comparison? If we substitute option C into the original sentence then: In the 2000s, the annual rate of increase in the average salary of a software engineer was nearly twice that of the 1990s. Wouldn't it mean that we are comparing average salary of software engineer with 1990s?? in other words we are comparing average salary with a number



Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Oct 2017
Posts: 267

Re: In the 2000s, the annual rate of increase in the average salary of a s
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Aug 2018, 13:27
Prateek176 wrote: daagh wrote: In the 2000s, the annual rate of increase in the average salary of a software engineer was nearly twice as fast as the 1990s.
A twice as fast as B twice as fast as it was in C twice that of D two times faster than that of E two times greater than
1. We are not comparing the decades. Hence, A and E are out. 2. Unless we can call the increases as one time, two times, the phrase 'two times' is not useful. You cannot describe a quantum in countable times. Therefore, D is out. 3. The rate of increase does not have speed. We can say Tom grows faster than Dick. However, we cannot say Tom's growth rate is faster than Dick's. Therefore, B is out. C is the answer avoiding the abovesaid pitfalls. ' Generally, 'two times' is used more in informal daily conversations than 'twice' used in formal writing. daagh sir I have one doubt. Wouldn't option C lead to a wrong comparison? If we substitute option C into the original sentence then: In the 2000s, the annual rate of increase in the average salary of a software engineer was nearly twice that of the 1990s. Wouldn't it mean that we are comparing average salary of software engineer with 1990s?? in other words we are comparing average salary with a number Hi Prateek, Whenever you have that of and those of in comparison, look for possible singular and plural antecedent respectively. Here that refers to   > look for possible singular antecedent    >annual rate Secondly look for comparison> of.... Of In the 2000s, the annual rate of increase in the average salary of a software engineer was nearly twice that(annual rate) of the 1990s Thank you = Kudos
_________________
Thank you =Kudos The best thing in life lies on the other side of the pain.




Re: In the 2000s, the annual rate of increase in the average salary of a s &nbs
[#permalink]
29 Aug 2018, 13:27






