It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 09:15

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In three centuriesfrom 1050 to 1350several million tons of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: mission completed!
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 1391

Kudos [?]: 951 [1], given: 621

GPA: 3.77
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
In three centuriesfrom 1050 to 1350several million tons of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Nov 2010, 02:07
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

76% (00:40) correct 24% (00:35) wrong based on 206 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In three centuries—from 1050 to 1350—several million tons of stone were quarried in France for the building of eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and some tens of thousands of parish churches.

(A) for the building of eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and some
(B) in order that they might build eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and some
(C) so as they might build eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and some
(D) so that there could be built eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and
(E) such that they could build eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Audaces fortuna juvat!

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 951 [1], given: 621

2 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4287

Kudos [?]: 7916 [2], given: 364

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: In three centuriesfrom 1050 to 1350several million tons of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Nov 2010, 11:24
2
This post received
KUDOS
A is the best for using of right idiom - for the building of - ; the best
in the given context. B,C and E suggest the tons of stones themselves build, an absurd possibility. -They - has no sensible referent.

D is wrong because of the awkward expression - there could be built. -
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Kudos [?]: 7916 [2], given: 364

3 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2010
Posts: 246

Kudos [?]: 246 [3], given: 65

GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Re: In three centuriesfrom 1050 to 1350several million tons of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Nov 2010, 12:11
3
This post received
KUDOS
A.

A. is wordy, but there's nothing wrong grammatically.

B. 'might' serves no purpose. they has no clear antecedent and can even refer to tons of stone.

C. 'so as ... might..' 'so as' is unidiomatic. 'might' serves no purpose and makes the passage wordy.
'They' has no clear antecedent.

D. 'There could be built'. Use of there and passive voice are awkward.

E. 'They' has no clear antecedent.

_________________

Consider KUDOS if my post was helpful. :-D

My Debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/750-q49v42-105591.html#p825487

Kudos [?]: 246 [3], given: 65

VP
VP
User avatar
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1377

Kudos [?]: 1679 [0], given: 62

Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: In three centuriesfrom 1050 to 1350several million tons of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jul 2011, 22:57
7
This post was
BOOKMARKED
29. In three centuries--from 1050 to 1350--several million tons of stone were quarried in France for the building
of eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and some
tens of thousands of parish churches.
(A) for the building of eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and some
(B) in order that they might build eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and some
(C) so as they might build eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and some
(D) so that there could be built eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and
(E) such that they could build eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and

Last edited by broall on 29 May 2017, 00:51, edited 1 time in total.
Merged post. Please search before posting

Kudos [?]: 1679 [0], given: 62

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Posts: 112

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 6

Re: In three centuriesfrom 1050 to 1350several million tons of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jul 2011, 23:13
siddharthasingh wrote:
29. In three centuries--from 1050 to 1350--several million tons of stone were quarried in France for the building
of eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and some
tens of thousands of parish churches.
(A) for the building of eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and some --- correct
(B) in order that they might build eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and some
(C) so as they might build eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and some
(D) so that there could be built eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and
(E) such that they could build eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and


they does not have any proper antecedent here... hence left with options A and D..
could be built is awkward in D..
A has no issues..

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 6

Director
Director
avatar
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 672

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 37

Re: In three centuriesfrom 1050 to 1350several million tons of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jul 2011, 06:27
+1 for A. Other choices are easy to eliminate.

Crick

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 37

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Oct 2010
Posts: 252

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 27

Location: India
GMAT 1: 560 Q36 V31
GPA: 3
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: In three centuriesfrom 1050 to 1350several million tons of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Aug 2011, 23:22
I got the question right. But it was more of a calculated guess. Can someone explain why D is wrong?

"there could be built sounds correct"
_________________

petrifiedbutstanding

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 27

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1634

Kudos [?]: 1105 [0], given: 109

Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Re: In three centuriesfrom 1050 to 1350several million tons of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Aug 2011, 08:20
+1 A

"they" doesn't have antecedent.
D changes the meaning. It seems that the churches were built in where the stones were.
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1105 [0], given: 109

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: Project Management Professional (PMP)
Joined: 30 Jun 2011
Posts: 198

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 12

Location: New Delhi, India
Re: In three centuriesfrom 1050 to 1350several million tons of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jun 2012, 02:56
This is on OG question.. a good one indeed
_________________

Best
Vaibhav

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, Thanks

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 12

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Oct 2013
Posts: 87

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 45

Location: Brazil
GMAT 1: 660 Q45 V35
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V38
Reviews Badge
Re: In three centuriesfrom 1050 to 1350several million tons of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Dec 2013, 09:12
Well, "could be built" is passive form and it is parallel to "were quarried". I don't understand why this is wrong. Can someone explain, please?


ctkrishnan wrote:
siddharthasingh wrote:
29. In three centuries--from 1050 to 1350--several million tons of stone were quarried in France for the building
of eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and some
tens of thousands of parish churches.
(A) for the building of eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and some --- correct
(B) in order that they might build eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and some
(C) so as they might build eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and some
(D) so that there could be built eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and
(E) such that they could build eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and


they does not have any proper antecedent here... hence left with options A and D..
could be built is awkward in D..
A has no issues..

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 45

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 Dec 2013
Posts: 8

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 2

Re: In three centuriesfrom 1050 to 1350several million tons of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Dec 2013, 15:05
nechets wrote:
Well, "could be built" is passive form and it is parallel to "were quarried". I don't understand why this is wrong. Can someone explain, please?


As mentioned, "could be built" is awkward because the nouns (eighty cathedrals, etc.) are AFTER the verb.

One could have written "... eighty cathedrals could be built..." but not "... could be built eighty cathedrals..."

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 2

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Apr 2013
Posts: 269

Kudos [?]: 30 [1], given: 27

Re: In three centuriesfrom 1050 to 1350several million tons of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jan 2014, 03:47
1
This post received
KUDOS
THERE COULD BE DONE SOMETHING is not idiomatic.
_________________

If anyone in this gmat forum is in England,Britain, pls, email to me, (thanghnvn@gmail.com) . I have some questions and need your advise. Thank a lot.

Kudos [?]: 30 [1], given: 27

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10108

Kudos [?]: 262 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: In three centuriesfrom 1050 to 1350several million tons of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2015, 08:42
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 262 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 30 Jun 2014
Posts: 46

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 76

GPA: 3.6
WE: Operations (Energy and Utilities)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: In three centuriesfrom 1050 to 1350several million tons of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2015, 04:55
options B,C,D,E are showing uncertain condition. but from the meaning of the question we can figure out that the stones were used to build all these buildings.

so,
A only.

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 76

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 24 Feb 2017
Posts: 39

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: In three centuriesfrom 1050 to 1350several million tons of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 May 2017, 23:18
what is the problem with option D ?
'there' is refer to place !?

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Expert Post
Manhattan Prep Instructor
User avatar
B
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1109

Kudos [?]: 1178 [0], given: 29

Re: In three centuriesfrom 1050 to 1350several million tons of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 May 2017, 14:21
mkumar26, D is one of those choices that seems completely logical but just doesn't follow the conventions of English. Generally, we put the subject before the verb unless there's an important reason not to. That would give us "so that eighty cathedrals, five hundred large churches, and some tens of thousands of parish churches could be built."

Also, "there" in this case wouldn't normally be read as referring to a place. It would read as an introductory subject for the clause, as in "There are too many exclamation marks in this sentence!!!!" That doesn't really change the grammar too much, but we'd still only use a subject-last construction like this if we were trying to look very old-fashioned, as in this famous quote from the King James Bible: "For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour . . . "
_________________


Dmitry Farber | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | New York


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Kudos [?]: 1178 [0], given: 29

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2016
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: In three centuriesfrom 1050 to 1350several million tons of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 May 2017, 16:25
D is wrong because there refers to France. Therefore, if you replace there with France the sentence becomes more awkward.
Hence A is the answer.
Correct me if my explanation is wrong.

Sent from my AO5510 using Tapatalk

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Expert Post
Manhattan Prep Instructor
User avatar
B
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1109

Kudos [?]: 1178 [0], given: 29

Re: In three centuriesfrom 1050 to 1350several million tons of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 May 2017, 20:56
Well, when we use "there" to refer to a place, we can't just swap in that place name to test it. When used in this way (as in, "I built the tower there."), the word "there" is not a pronoun but an adverb! The exact words to replace it would depend on context:

I bought a ticket to France because I've never been there.
Translation: I bought a ticket to France because I've never been to France.

I went to France because there are many beautiful cathedrals there.
Translation: I went to France because there are many beautiful cathedrals in France.

But as I said in my previous post, "there" should probably not be read as referring to France at all!
_________________


Dmitry Farber | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | New York


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Kudos [?]: 1178 [0], given: 29

Re: In three centuriesfrom 1050 to 1350several million tons of   [#permalink] 30 May 2017, 20:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In three centuriesfrom 1050 to 1350several million tons of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.